我有一些单元测试,期望“当前时间”与DateTime不同。显然,我不想改变电脑的时间。
实现这一目标的最佳策略是什么?
我有一些单元测试,期望“当前时间”与DateTime不同。显然,我不想改变电脑的时间。
实现这一目标的最佳策略是什么?
当前回答
也许不太专业,但更简单的解决方案可以在消费者方法中创建一个DateTime参数。例如,不使用像SampleMethod这样的make方法,而是使用带参数的make SampleMethod1。SampleMethod1的测试更简单
public void SampleMethod()
{
DateTime anotherDateTime = DateTime.Today.AddDays(-10);
if ((DateTime.Now-anotherDateTime).TotalDays>10)
{
}
}
public void SampleMethod1(DateTime dateTimeNow)
{
DateTime anotherDateTime = DateTime.Today.AddDays(-10);
if ((dateTimeNow - anotherDateTime).TotalDays > 10)
{
}
}
其他回答
我也有同样的问题,但我在想我们不应该在同一类上使用设置日期时间的东西。因为有一天可能会导致滥用。我使用了提供商
public class DateTimeProvider
{
protected static DateTime? DateTimeNow;
protected static DateTime? DateTimeUtcNow;
public DateTime Now
{
get
{
return DateTimeNow ?? System.DateTime.Now;
}
}
public DateTime UtcNow
{
get
{
return DateTimeUtcNow ?? System.DateTime.UtcNow;
}
}
public static DateTimeProvider DateTime
{
get
{
return new DateTimeProvider();
}
}
protected DateTimeProvider()
{
}
}
对于测试,在测试项目中创建了一个助手来处理设置的事情,
public class MockDateTimeProvider : DateTimeProvider
{
public static void SetNow(DateTime now)
{
DateTimeNow = now;
}
public static void SetUtcNow(DateTime utc)
{
DateTimeUtcNow = utc;
}
public static void RestoreAsDefault()
{
DateTimeNow = null;
DateTimeUtcNow = null;
}
}
在代码
var dateTimeNow = DateTimeProvider.DateTime.Now //not DateTime.Now
var dateTimeUtcNow = DateTimeProvider.DateTime.UtcNow //not DateTime.UtcNow
在测试中
[Test]
public void Mocked_Now()
{
DateTime now = DateTime.Now;
MockDateTimeProvider.SetNow(now); //set to mock
Assert.AreEqual(now, DateTimeProvider.DateTime.Now);
Assert.AreNotEqual(now, DateTimeProvider.DateTime.UtcNow);
}
[Test]
public void Mocked_UtcNow()
{
DateTime utcNow = DateTime.UtcNow;
MockDateTimeProvider.SetUtcNow(utcNow); //set to mock
Assert.AreEqual(utcNow, DateTimeProvider.DateTime.UtcNow);
Assert.AreNotEqual(utcNow, DateTimeProvider.DateTime.Now);
}
但需要记住一件事,有时真正的DateTime和提供程序的DateTime并不相同
[Test]
public void Now()
{
Assert.AreEqual(DateTime.Now.Kind, DateTimeProvider.DateTime.Now.Kind);
Assert.LessOrEqual(DateTime.Now, DateTimeProvider.DateTime.Now);
Assert.LessOrEqual(DateTimeProvider.DateTime.Now - DateTime.Now, TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(1));
}
我假设差异是maximum TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(0.00002)。但大多数时候甚至更少
在MockSamples中找到样本
下面的代码为我工作:
bizDeedMock.Verify(p => p.SetDeed(It.Is<DsPostList>(x => x.PostLists[0].registerDate.Year == DateTime.Now.Year)));
bizDeedMock.Verify(p => p.SetDeed(It.Is<DsPostList>(x => x.PostLists[0].registerDate.Month == DateTime.Now.Month)));
bizDeedMock.Verify(p => p.SetDeed(It.Is<DsPostList>(x => x.PostLists[0].registerDate.Day == DateTime.Now.Day)));
最好的策略是将当前时间封装在一个抽象中,并将该抽象注入到使用者中。
或者,你也可以将时间抽象定义为环境上下文:
public abstract class TimeProvider
{
private static TimeProvider current =
DefaultTimeProvider.Instance;
public static TimeProvider Current
{
get { return TimeProvider.current; }
set
{
if (value == null)
{
throw new ArgumentNullException("value");
}
TimeProvider.current = value;
}
}
public abstract DateTime UtcNow { get; }
public static void ResetToDefault()
{
TimeProvider.current = DefaultTimeProvider.Instance;
}
}
这将使你能够像这样消费它:
var now = TimeProvider.Current.UtcNow;
在单元测试中,您可以替换TimeProvider。当前带有Test Double/Mock对象。使用Moq的例子:
var timeMock = new Mock<TimeProvider>();
timeMock.SetupGet(tp => tp.UtcNow).Returns(new DateTime(2010, 3, 11));
TimeProvider.Current = timeMock.Object;
但是,当使用静态状态进行单元测试时,始终记得通过调用TimeProvider.ResetToDefault()来删除fixture。
一个老问题,但仍然有效。
我的方法是创建一个新的接口和类来包装System.DateTime.Now调用
public interface INow
{
DateTime Execute();
}
public sealed class Now : INow
{
public DateTime Execute()
{
return DateTime.Now
}
}
该接口可以注入到任何需要获取当前日期和时间的类中。在这个例子中,我有一个类,它将一个时间跨度添加到当前日期和时间(一个可测试的单元System.DateTime.Now.Add(timespan))
public interface IAddTimeSpanToCurrentDateAndTime
{
DateTime Execute(TimeSpan input);
}
public class AddTimeSpanToCurrentDateAndTime : IAddTimeSpanToCurrentDateAndTime
{
private readonly INow _now;
public AddTimeSpanToCurrentDateAndTime(INow now)
{
this._now = now;
}
public DateTime Execute(TimeSpan input)
{
var currentDateAndTime = this._now.Execute();
return currentDateAndTime.Add(input);
}
}
并且可以编写测试以确保其正确运行。我使用NUnit和Moq,但任何测试框架都可以
public class Execute
{
private Moq.Mock<INow> _nowMock;
private AddTimeSpanToCurrentDateAndTime _systemUnderTest;
[SetUp]
public void Initialize()
{
this._nowMock = new Moq.Mock<INow>(Moq.MockBehavior.Strict);
this._systemUnderTest = AddTimeSpanToCurrentDateAndTime(
this._nowMock.Object);
}
[Test]
public void AddTimeSpanToCurrentDateAndTimeExecute0001()
{
// arrange
var input = new TimeSpan(911252);
// arrange : mocks
this._nowMock
.Setup(a => a.Execute())
.Returns(new DateTime(348756););
// arrange : expected
var expected = new DateTime(911252 + 348756);
// act
var actual = this._systemUnderTest.Execute(input).Result;
// assert
Assert.Equals(actual, expected);
}
}
此模式适用于依赖于外部因素的任何函数,如System.Random.Next(), System.DateTime.Now。UtcNow, system . guide . newguid()等。
参见https://loadlimited.visualstudio.com/Stamina/_git/Stamina.Core获取更多示例或获取https://www.nuget.org/packages/Stamina.Core nuget包。
好的做法是,当DateTimeProvider实现IDisposable时。
public class DateTimeProvider : IDisposable
{
[ThreadStatic]
private static DateTime? _injectedDateTime;
private DateTimeProvider()
{
}
/// <summary>
/// Gets DateTime now.
/// </summary>
/// <value>
/// The DateTime now.
/// </value>
public static DateTime Now
{
get
{
return _injectedDateTime ?? DateTime.Now;
}
}
/// <summary>
/// Injects the actual date time.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="actualDateTime">The actual date time.</param>
public static IDisposable InjectActualDateTime(DateTime actualDateTime)
{
_injectedDateTime = actualDateTime;
return new DateTimeProvider();
}
public void Dispose()
{
_injectedDateTime = null;
}
}
接下来,您可以为单元测试注入假DateTime
using (var date = DateTimeProvider.InjectActualDateTime(expectedDateTime))
{
var bankAccount = new BankAccount();
bankAccount.DepositMoney(600);
var lastTransaction = bankAccount.Transactions.Last();
Assert.IsTrue(expectedDateTime.Equals(bankAccount.Transactions[0].TransactionDate));
}
参见示例DateTimeProvider示例