我希望使用shell脚本调用长形式和短形式的命令行选项。
我知道可以使用getopts,但是像在Perl中一样,我不能用shell做同样的事情。
关于如何做到这一点的任何想法,这样我就可以使用如下选项:
./shell.sh --copyfile abc.pl /tmp/
./shell.sh -c abc.pl /tmp/
在上面,这两个命令对我的shell意味着同样的事情,但使用getopts,我还不能实现这些?
我希望使用shell脚本调用长形式和短形式的命令行选项。
我知道可以使用getopts,但是像在Perl中一样,我不能用shell做同样的事情。
关于如何做到这一点的任何想法,这样我就可以使用如下选项:
./shell.sh --copyfile abc.pl /tmp/
./shell.sh -c abc.pl /tmp/
在上面,这两个命令对我的shell意味着同样的事情,但使用getopts,我还不能实现这些?
当前回答
下面是一个实际使用长选项的getopt的示例:
aflag=no
bflag=no
cargument=none
# options may be followed by one colon to indicate they have a required argument
if ! options=$(getopt -o abc: -l along,blong,clong: -- "$@")
then
# something went wrong, getopt will put out an error message for us
exit 1
fi
set -- $options
while [ $# -gt 0 ]
do
case $1 in
-a|--along) aflag="yes" ;;
-b|--blong) bflag="yes" ;;
# for options with required arguments, an additional shift is required
-c|--clong) cargument="$2" ; shift;;
(--) shift; break;;
(-*) echo "$0: error - unrecognized option $1" 1>&2; exit 1;;
(*) break;;
esac
shift
done
其他回答
下面你可以找到bash中复杂选项解析的几种不同方法: http://mywiki.wooledge.org/ComplexOptionParsing
我确实创建了下面的一个,而且我认为它很好,因为它的代码最少 多头和空头选择都有效。使用这种方法,长选项也可以有多个参数。
#!/bin/bash
# Uses bash extensions. Not portable as written.
declare -A longoptspec
longoptspec=( [loglevel]=1 ) #use associative array to declare how many arguments a long option expects, in this case we declare that loglevel expects/has one argument, long options that aren't listed i n this way will have zero arguments by default
optspec=":h-:"
while getopts "$optspec" opt; do
while true; do
case "${opt}" in
-) #OPTARG is name-of-long-option or name-of-long-option=value
if [[ "${OPTARG}" =~ .*=.* ]] #with this --key=value format only one argument is possible
then
opt=${OPTARG/=*/}
OPTARG=${OPTARG#*=}
((OPTIND--))
else #with this --key value1 value2 format multiple arguments are possible
opt="$OPTARG"
OPTARG=(${@:OPTIND:$((longoptspec[$opt]))})
fi
((OPTIND+=longoptspec[$opt]))
continue #now that opt/OPTARG are set we can process them as if getopts would've given us long options
;;
loglevel)
loglevel=$OPTARG
;;
h|help)
echo "usage: $0 [--loglevel[=]<value>]" >&2
exit 2
;;
esac
break; done
done
# End of file
一个简单的DIY,只获得长名称的参数:
Use:
$ ./test-args.sh --a1 a1 --a2 "a 2" --a3 --a4= --a5=a5 --a6="a 6"
a1 = "a1"
a2 = "a 2"
a3 = "TRUE"
a4 = ""
a5 = "a5"
a6 = "a 6"
a7 = ""
脚本:
#!/bin/bash
function main() {
ARGS=`getArgs "$@"`
a1=`echo "$ARGS" | getNamedArg a1`
a2=`echo "$ARGS" | getNamedArg a2`
a3=`echo "$ARGS" | getNamedArg a3`
a4=`echo "$ARGS" | getNamedArg a4`
a5=`echo "$ARGS" | getNamedArg a5`
a6=`echo "$ARGS" | getNamedArg a6`
a7=`echo "$ARGS" | getNamedArg a7`
echo "a1 = \"$a1\""
echo "a2 = \"$a2\""
echo "a3 = \"$a3\""
echo "a4 = \"$a4\""
echo "a5 = \"$a5\""
echo "a6 = \"$a6\""
echo "a7 = \"$a7\""
exit 0
}
function getArgs() {
for arg in "$@"; do
echo "$arg"
done
}
function getNamedArg() {
ARG_NAME=$1
sed --regexp-extended --quiet --expression="
s/^--$ARG_NAME=(.*)\$/\1/p # Get arguments in format '--arg=value': [s]ubstitute '--arg=value' by 'value', and [p]rint
/^--$ARG_NAME\$/ { # Get arguments in format '--arg value' ou '--arg'
n # - [n]ext, because in this format, if value exists, it will be the next argument
/^--/! p # - If next doesn't starts with '--', it is the value of the actual argument
/^--/ { # - If next do starts with '--', it is the next argument and the actual argument is a boolean one
# Then just repla[c]ed by TRUE
c TRUE
}
}
"
}
main "$@"
另一种方式…
# translate long options to short
for arg
do
delim=""
case "$arg" in
--help) args="${args}-h ";;
--verbose) args="${args}-v ";;
--config) args="${args}-c ";;
# pass through anything else
*) [[ "${arg:0:1}" == "-" ]] || delim="\""
args="${args}${delim}${arg}${delim} ";;
esac
done
# reset the translated args
eval set -- $args
# now we can process with getopt
while getopts ":hvc:" opt; do
case $opt in
h) usage ;;
v) VERBOSE=true ;;
c) source $OPTARG ;;
\?) usage ;;
:)
echo "option -$OPTARG requires an argument"
usage
;;
esac
done
公认的答案很好地指出了bash内置getopts的所有缺点。答案以:
因此,虽然可以编写更多的代码来解决长选项支持不足的问题,但工作量要大得多,并且在一定程度上违背了使用getopt解析器来简化代码的目的。
尽管我原则上同意这种说法,但我觉得我们在各种脚本中实现这个特性的次数证明,我们应该花一些精力来创建一个“标准化”的、经过良好测试的解决方案。
因此,我通过在纯bash中实现getopts_long“升级”了内置在getopts中的bash,没有外部依赖。该函数的使用与内置的getopts 100%兼容。
通过在脚本中包含getopts_long(在GitHub上托管),可以简单地实现原始问题的答案:
source "${PATH_TO}/getopts_long.bash"
while getopts_long ':c: copyfile:' OPTKEY; do
case ${OPTKEY} in
'c'|'copyfile')
echo 'file supplied -- ${OPTARG}'
;;
'?')
echo "INVALID OPTION -- ${OPTARG}" >&2
exit 1
;;
':')
echo "MISSING ARGUMENT for option -- ${OPTARG}" >&2
exit 1
;;
*)
echo "Misconfigured OPTSPEC or uncaught option -- ${OPTKEY}" >&2
exit 1
;;
esac
done
shift $(( OPTIND - 1 ))
[[ "${1}" == "--" ]] && shift
#!/bin/bash
while getopts "abc:d:" flag
do
case $flag in
a) echo "[getopts:$OPTIND]==> -$flag";;
b) echo "[getopts:$OPTIND]==> -$flag";;
c) echo "[getopts:$OPTIND]==> -$flag $OPTARG";;
d) echo "[getopts:$OPTIND]==> -$flag $OPTARG";;
esac
done
shift $((OPTIND-1))
echo "[otheropts]==> $@"
exit
.
#!/bin/bash
until [ -z "$1" ]; do
case $1 in
"--dlong")
shift
if [ "${1:1:0}" != "-" ]
then
echo "==> dlong $1"
shift
fi;;
*) echo "==> other $1"; shift;;
esac
done
exit