我有一个解决方案，类似于ironhacker的，除了我使用日志。在我的一些代码中，我发现我需要在将异常传递回队列之前格式化它，因为回溯是不能pickle的:

class QueueHandler(logging.Handler):
    def __init__(self, queue):
        logging.Handler.__init__(self)
        self.queue = queue
    def emit(self, record):
        if record.exc_info:
            # can't pass exc_info across processes so just format now
            record.exc_text = self.formatException(record.exc_info)
            record.exc_info = None
        self.queue.put(record)
    def formatException(self, ei):
        sio = cStringIO.StringIO()
        traceback.print_exception(ei[0], ei[1], ei[2], None, sio)
        s = sio.getvalue()
        sio.close()
        if s[-1] == "\n":
            s = s[:-1]
        return s

下面是我简单的破解/变通方法…不是最全面的，但很容易修改，比我在写这篇文章之前找到的任何其他答案都更容易阅读和理解:

import logging
import multiprocessing

class FakeLogger(object):
    def __init__(self, q):
        self.q = q
    def info(self, item):
        self.q.put('INFO - {}'.format(item))
    def debug(self, item):
        self.q.put('DEBUG - {}'.format(item))
    def critical(self, item):
        self.q.put('CRITICAL - {}'.format(item))
    def warning(self, item):
        self.q.put('WARNING - {}'.format(item))

def some_other_func_that_gets_logger_and_logs(num):
    # notice the name get's discarded
    # of course you can easily add this to your FakeLogger class
    local_logger = logging.getLogger('local')
    local_logger.info('Hey I am logging this: {} and working on it to make this {}!'.format(num, num*2))
    local_logger.debug('hmm, something may need debugging here')
    return num*2

def func_to_parallelize(data_chunk):
    # unpack our args
    the_num, logger_q = data_chunk
    # since we're now in a new process, let's monkeypatch the logging module
    logging.getLogger = lambda name=None: FakeLogger(logger_q)
    # now do the actual work that happens to log stuff too
    new_num = some_other_func_that_gets_logger_and_logs(the_num)
    return (the_num, new_num)

if __name__ == '__main__':
    multiprocessing.freeze_support()
    m = multiprocessing.Manager()
    logger_q = m.Queue()
    # we have to pass our data to be parallel-processed
    # we also need to pass the Queue object so we can retrieve the logs
    parallelable_data = [(1, logger_q), (2, logger_q)]
    # set up a pool of processes so we can take advantage of multiple CPU cores
    pool_size = multiprocessing.cpu_count() * 2
    pool = multiprocessing.Pool(processes=pool_size, maxtasksperchild=4)
    worker_output = pool.map(func_to_parallelize, parallelable_data)
    pool.close() # no more tasks
    pool.join()  # wrap up current tasks
    # get the contents of our FakeLogger object
    while not logger_q.empty():
        print logger_q.get()
    print 'worker output contained: {}'.format(worker_output)

我喜欢zzzeek的回答。我只会用管道代替队列，因为如果多个线程/进程使用相同的管道端来生成日志消息，它们将被混淆。

只需将日志记录器的实例发布到某个地方。这样，其他模块和客户端就可以使用您的API来获取记录器，而不必导入multiprocessing。

有一个很棒的套餐

包: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/multiprocessing-logging/

代码: https://github.com/jruere/multiprocessing-logging

安装:

pip install multiprocessing-logging

然后添加:

import multiprocessing_logging

# This enables logs inside process
multiprocessing_logging.install_mp_handler()

最简单的想法是:

获取当前进程的文件名和进程id。 设置一个[WatchedFileHandler][1]。这里将详细讨论此处理程序的原因，但简而言之，其他日志处理程序存在某些更糟糕的竞争条件。这个有最短的竞态条件窗口。 选择日志保存路径，例如“/var/log/…”