我目前正在使用以下代码在我的程序中右修剪所有std::字符串:

std::string s;
s.erase(s.find_last_not_of(" \n\r\t")+1);

它工作得很好,但我想知道是否有一些最终情况下它可能会失败?

当然,有优雅的选择和左修剪解决方案的答案是受欢迎的。


当前回答

这个……怎么样?

#include <iostream>
#include <string>
#include <regex>

std::string ltrim( std::string str ) {
    return std::regex_replace( str, std::regex("^\\s+"), std::string("") );
}

std::string rtrim( std::string str ) {
    return std::regex_replace( str, std::regex("\\s+$"), std::string("") );
}

std::string trim( std::string str ) {
    return ltrim( rtrim( str ) );
}

int main() {

    std::string str = "   \t  this is a test string  \n   ";
    std::cout << "-" << trim( str ) << "-\n";
    return 0;

}

注意:我对c++还是个新手,所以如果我在这里离题了,请原谅。

其他回答

下面是一个用正则表达式进行修整的解决方案

#include <string>
#include <regex>

string trim(string str){
    return regex_replace(str, regex("(^[ ]+)|([ ]+$)"),"");
}

C++11:

int i{};
string s = " h e ll \t\n  o";
string trim = " \n\t";

while ((i = s.find_first_of(trim)) != -1)
    s.erase(i,1);

cout << s;

输出:

hello

也适用于空字符串

我知道这是一个非常老的问题,但我已经为您的问题添加了几行代码,它从两端删除了空白。

void trim(std::string &line){

    auto val = line.find_last_not_of(" \n\r\t") + 1;

    if(val == line.size() || val == std::string::npos){
        val = line.find_first_not_of(" \n\r\t");
        line = line.substr(val);
    }
    else
        line.erase(val);
}

For what it's worth, here is a trim implementation with an eye towards performance. It's much quicker than many other trim routines I've seen around. Instead of using iterators and std::finds, it uses raw c strings and indices. It optimizes the following special cases: size 0 string (do nothing), string with no whitespace to trim (do nothing), string with only trailing whitespace to trim (just resize the string), string that's entirely whitespace (just clear the string). And finally, in the worst case (string with leading whitespace), it does its best to perform an efficient copy construction, performing only 1 copy and then moving that copy in place of the original string.

void TrimString(std::string & str)
{ 
    if(str.empty())
        return;

    const auto pStr = str.c_str();

    size_t front = 0;
    while(front < str.length() && std::isspace(int(pStr[front]))) {++front;}

    size_t back = str.length();
    while(back > front && std::isspace(int(pStr[back-1]))) {--back;}

    if(0 == front)
    {
        if(back < str.length())
        {
            str.resize(back - front);
        }
    }
    else if(back <= front)
    {
        str.clear();
    }
    else
    {
        str = std::move(std::string(str.begin()+front, str.begin()+back));
    }
}

因为我想用c++ 11的方法更新我的旧c++修剪函数,我已经测试了很多关于这个问题的答案。我的结论是,我保留了旧的c++解决方案!

它是总体上最快的一个,即使添加更多的字符来检查(例如\r\n我没有看到\f\v的用例)仍然比使用算法的解决方案更快。

std::string & trimMe (std::string & str)
{
   // right trim
   while (str.length () > 0 && (str [str.length ()-1] == ' ' || str [str.length ()-1] == '\t'))
      str.erase (str.length ()-1, 1);

   // left trim
   while (str.length () > 0 && (str [0] == ' ' || str [0] == '\t'))
      str.erase (0, 1);
   return str;
}