如何迭代由空格分隔的单词组成的字符串中的单词?

注意,我对C字符串函数或那种字符操作/访问不感兴趣。比起效率,我更喜欢优雅。我当前的解决方案:

#include <iostream>
#include <sstream>
#include <string>

using namespace std;

int main() {
    string s = "Somewhere down the road";
    istringstream iss(s);

    do {
        string subs;
        iss >> subs;
        cout << "Substring: " << subs << endl;
    } while (iss);
}

当前回答

这是我的版本获取了Kev的来源:

#include <string>
#include <vector>
void split(vector<string> &result, string str, char delim ) {
  string tmp;
  string::iterator i;
  result.clear();

  for(i = str.begin(); i <= str.end(); ++i) {
    if((const char)*i != delim  && i != str.end()) {
      tmp += *i;
    } else {
      result.push_back(tmp);
      tmp = "";
    }
  }
}

之后,调用函数并执行以下操作:

vector<string> hosts;
split(hosts, "192.168.1.2,192.168.1.3", ',');
for( size_t i = 0; i < hosts.size(); i++){
  cout <<  "Connecting host : " << hosts.at(i) << "..." << endl;
}

其他回答

我对string和u32string~的一般实现,使用boost::algorithm::split签名。

template<typename CharT, typename UnaryPredicate>
void split(std::vector<std::basic_string<CharT>>& split_result,
           const std::basic_string<CharT>& s,
           UnaryPredicate predicate)
{
    using ST = std::basic_string<CharT>;
    using std::swap;
    std::vector<ST> tmp_result;
    auto iter = s.cbegin(),
         end_iter = s.cend();
    while (true)
    {
        /**
         * edge case: empty str -> push an empty str and exit.
         */
        auto find_iter = find_if(iter, end_iter, predicate);
        tmp_result.emplace_back(iter, find_iter);
        if (find_iter == end_iter) { break; }
        iter = ++find_iter; 
    }
    swap(tmp_result, split_result);
}


template<typename CharT>
void split(std::vector<std::basic_string<CharT>>& split_result,
           const std::basic_string<CharT>& s,
           const std::basic_string<CharT>& char_candidate)
{
    std::unordered_set<CharT> candidate_set(char_candidate.cbegin(),
                                            char_candidate.cend());
    auto predicate = [&candidate_set](const CharT& c) {
        return candidate_set.count(c) > 0U;
    };
    return split(split_result, s, predicate);
}

template<typename CharT>
void split(std::vector<std::basic_string<CharT>>& split_result,
           const std::basic_string<CharT>& s,
           const CharT* literals)
{
    return split(split_result, s, std::basic_string<CharT>(literals));
}
// adapted from a "regular" csv parse
std::string stringIn = "my csv  is 10233478 NOTseparated by commas";
std::vector<std::string> commaSeparated(1);
int commaCounter = 0;
for (int i=0; i<stringIn.size(); i++) {
    if (stringIn[i] == " ") {
        commaSeparated.push_back("");
        commaCounter++;
    } else {
        commaSeparated.at(commaCounter) += stringIn[i];
    }
}

最后你会得到一个字符串向量,句子中的每个元素都用空格隔开。唯一的非标准资源是std::vector(但由于涉及std::string,我认为它是可以接受的)。

空字符串保存为单独的项。

LazyString拆分器:

#include <string>
#include <algorithm>
#include <unordered_set>

using namespace std;

class LazyStringSplitter
{
    string::const_iterator start, finish;
    unordered_set<char> chop;

public:

    // Empty Constructor
    explicit LazyStringSplitter()
    {}

    explicit LazyStringSplitter (const string cstr, const string delims)
        : start(cstr.begin())
        , finish(cstr.end())
        , chop(delims.begin(), delims.end())
    {}

    void operator () (const string cstr, const string delims)
    {
        chop.insert(delims.begin(), delims.end());
        start = cstr.begin();
        finish = cstr.end();
    }

    bool empty() const { return (start >= finish); }

    string next()
    {
        // return empty string
        // if ran out of characters
        if (empty())
            return string("");

        auto runner = find_if(start, finish, [&](char c) {
            return chop.count(c) == 1;
        });

        // construct next string
        string ret(start, runner);
        start = runner + 1;

        // Never return empty string
        // + tail recursion makes this method efficient
        return !ret.empty() ? ret : next();
    }
};

我将此方法称为LazyStringSplitter是因为一个原因——它不会一次性拆分字符串。本质上,它的行为类似于python生成器它公开了一个名为next的方法,该方法返回从原始字符串拆分的下一个字符串我使用了c++11STL中的无序集,因此查找分隔符的速度要快得多下面是它的工作原理

测试程序

#include <iostream>
using namespace std;

int main()
{
    LazyStringSplitter splitter;

    // split at the characters ' ', '!', '.', ','
    splitter("This, is a string. And here is another string! Let's test and see how well this does.", " !.,");

    while (!splitter.empty())
        cout << splitter.next() << endl;
    return 0;
}

输出,输出

This
is
a
string
And
here
is
another
string
Let's
test
and
see
how
well
this
does

改进这一点的下一个计划是实施开始和结束方法,以便可以执行以下操作:

vector<string> split_string(splitter.begin(), splitter.end());

谢谢@Jairo Abdiel Toribio Cisneros。它对我有效,但您的函数返回一些空元素。因此,对于没有空的返回,我编辑了以下内容:

std::vector<std::string> split(std::string str, const char* delim) {
    std::vector<std::string> v;
    std::string tmp;

    for(std::string::const_iterator i = str.begin(); i <= str.end(); ++i) {
        if(*i != *delim && i != str.end()) {
            tmp += *i;
        } else {
            if (tmp.length() > 0) {
                v.push_back(tmp);
            }
            tmp = "";
        }
    }

    return v;
}

使用:

std::string s = "one:two::three";
std::string delim = ":";
std::vector<std::string> vv = split(s, delim.c_str());

我刚刚写了一个很好的例子,说明如何按符号拆分一个字符,然后将每个字符数组(由符号分隔的单词)放入一个向量中。为了简单起见,我创建了std字符串的向量类型。

我希望这对你有帮助,并且对你可读。

#include <vector>
#include <string>
#include <iostream>

void push(std::vector<std::string> &WORDS, std::string &TMP){
    WORDS.push_back(TMP);
    TMP = "";
}
std::vector<std::string> mySplit(char STRING[]){
        std::vector<std::string> words;
        std::string s;
        for(unsigned short i = 0; i < strlen(STRING); i++){
            if(STRING[i] != ' '){
                s += STRING[i];
            }else{
                push(words, s);
            }
        }
        push(words, s);//Used to get last split
        return words;
}

int main(){
    char string[] = "My awesome string.";
    std::cout << mySplit(string)[2];
    std::cin.get();
    return 0;
}