Linux

虽然已经有人建议使用execinfo.h中的backtrace()函数来打印堆栈跟踪并在出现分段错误时优雅地退出，但我没有看到提到确保所产生的回溯指向错误的实际位置所必需的复杂性(至少对于某些架构- x86和ARM)。

进入信号处理程序时，堆栈帧链中的前两个条目在信号处理程序中包含一个返回地址，在libc中的sigaction()中包含一个返回地址。在信号(即故障位置)之前调用的最后一个函数的堆栈帧丢失。

Code

#ifndef _GNU_SOURCE
#define _GNU_SOURCE
#endif
#ifndef __USE_GNU
#define __USE_GNU
#endif

#include <execinfo.h>
#include <signal.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <ucontext.h>
#include <unistd.h>

/* This structure mirrors the one found in /usr/include/asm/ucontext.h */
typedef struct _sig_ucontext {
 unsigned long     uc_flags;
 ucontext_t        *uc_link;
 stack_t           uc_stack;
 sigcontext_t      uc_mcontext;
 sigset_t          uc_sigmask;
} sig_ucontext_t;

void crit_err_hdlr(int sig_num, siginfo_t * info, void * ucontext)
{
 void *             array[50];
 void *             caller_address;
 char **            messages;
 int                size, i;
 sig_ucontext_t *   uc;

 uc = (sig_ucontext_t *)ucontext;

 /* Get the address at the time the signal was raised */
#if defined(__i386__) // gcc specific
 caller_address = (void *) uc->uc_mcontext.eip; // EIP: x86 specific
#elif defined(__x86_64__) // gcc specific
 caller_address = (void *) uc->uc_mcontext.rip; // RIP: x86_64 specific
#else
#error Unsupported architecture. // TODO: Add support for other arch.
#endif

 fprintf(stderr, "signal %d (%s), address is %p from %p\n", 
  sig_num, strsignal(sig_num), info->si_addr, 
  (void *)caller_address);

 size = backtrace(array, 50);

 /* overwrite sigaction with caller's address */
 array[1] = caller_address;

 messages = backtrace_symbols(array, size);

 /* skip first stack frame (points here) */
 for (i = 1; i < size && messages != NULL; ++i)
 {
  fprintf(stderr, "[bt]: (%d) %s\n", i, messages[i]);
 }

 free(messages);

 exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}

int crash()
{
 char * p = NULL;
 *p = 0;
 return 0;
}

int foo4()
{
 crash();
 return 0;
}

int foo3()
{
 foo4();
 return 0;
}

int foo2()
{
 foo3();
 return 0;
}

int foo1()
{
 foo2();
 return 0;
}

int main(int argc, char ** argv)
{
 struct sigaction sigact;

 sigact.sa_sigaction = crit_err_hdlr;
 sigact.sa_flags = SA_RESTART | SA_SIGINFO;

 if (sigaction(SIGSEGV, &sigact, (struct sigaction *)NULL) != 0)
 {
  fprintf(stderr, "error setting signal handler for %d (%s)\n",
    SIGSEGV, strsignal(SIGSEGV));

  exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
 }

 foo1();

 exit(EXIT_SUCCESS);
}

输出

signal 11 (Segmentation fault), address is (nil) from 0x8c50
[bt]: (1) ./test(crash+0x24) [0x8c50]
[bt]: (2) ./test(foo4+0x10) [0x8c70]
[bt]: (3) ./test(foo3+0x10) [0x8c8c]
[bt]: (4) ./test(foo2+0x10) [0x8ca8]
[bt]: (5) ./test(foo1+0x10) [0x8cc4]
[bt]: (6) ./test(main+0x74) [0x8d44]
[bt]: (7) /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xa8) [0x40032e44]

在信号处理程序中调用backtrace()函数的所有危险仍然存在，不应忽视，但我发现这里描述的功能对调试崩溃非常有帮助。

需要注意的是，我提供的示例是在x86的Linux上开发/测试的。我也成功地实现了这在ARM上使用uc_mcontext。Arm_pc代替uc_mcontext.eip。

下面是我了解这个实现细节的文章的链接: http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/6391

您没有指定您的操作系统，因此这个问题很难回答。如果你使用的是基于gnu libc的系统，你可以使用libc函数backtrace()。

GCC还有两个内置组件可以帮助你，但它们可能也可能不能在你的架构上完全实现，它们是__builtin_frame_address和__builtin_return_address。两者都需要一个即时整数级别(这里的即时是指它不能是一个变量)。如果给定级别的__builtin_frame_address非零，那么获取同一级别的返回地址应该是安全的。

在Linux/unix/MacOSX上使用核心文件(您可以通过ulimit或兼容的系统调用启用它们)。在Windows上使用Microsoft错误报告(您可以成为合作伙伴并访问您的应用程序崩溃数据)。

You are probably not going to like this - all I can say in its favour is that it works for me, and I have similar but not identical requirements: I am writing a compiler/transpiler for a 1970's Algol-like language which uses C as it's output and then compiles the C so that as far as the user is concerned, they're generally not aware of C being involved, so although you might call it a transpiler, it's effectively a compiler that uses C as it's intermediate code. The language being compiled has a history of providing good diagnostics and a full backtrace in the original native compilers. I've been able to find gcc compiler flags and libraries etc that allow me to trap most of the runtime errors that the original compilers did (although with one glaring exception - unassigned variable trapping). When a runtime error occurs (eg arithmetic overflow, divide by zero, array index out of bounds, etc) the original compilers output a backtrace to the console listing all variables in the stack frames of every active procedure call. I struggled to get this effect in C, but eventually did so with what can only be described as a hack... When the program is invoked, the wrapper that supplies the C "main" looks at its argv, and if a special option is not present, it restarts itself under gdb with an altered argv containing both gdb options and the 'magic' option string for the program itself. This restarted version then hides those strings from the user's code by restoring the original arguments before calling the main block of the code written in our language. When an error occurs (as long as it is not one explicitly trapped within the program by user code), it exits to gdb which prints the required backtrace.

启动序列中的关键代码行包括:

  if ((argc >= 1) && (strcmp(origargv[argc-1], "--restarting-under-gdb")) != 0) {
    // initial invocation
    // the "--restarting-under-gdb" option is how the copy running under gdb knows
    // not to start another gdb process.

and

  char *gdb [] = {
    "/usr/bin/gdb", "-q", "-batch", "-nx", "-nh", "-return-child-result",
    "-ex", "run",
    "-ex", "bt full",
    "--args"
  };

The original arguments are appended to the gdb options above. That should be enough of a hint for you to do something similar for your own system. I did look at other library-supported backtrace options (eg libbacktrace, https://codingrelic.geekhold.com/2010/09/gcc-function-instrumentation.html, etc) but they only output the procedure call stack, not the local variables. However if anyone knows of any cleaner mechanism to get a similar effect, do please let us know. The main downside to this is that the variables are printed in C syntax, not the syntax of the language the user writes in. And (until I add suitable #line directives on every generated line of C :-() the backtrace lists the C source file and line numbers.

G PS我使用的gcc编译选项是:

 GCCOPTS=" -Wall -Wno-return-type -Wno-comment -g -fsanitize=undefined
 -fsanitize-undefined-trap-on-error -fno-sanitize-recover=all -frecord-gcc-switches
 -fsanitize=float-divide-by-zero -fsanitize=float-cast-overflow -ftrapv
 -grecord-gcc-switches -O0 -ggdb3 "

对于Linux和Mac OS X，如果使用gcc或任何使用glibc的编译器，可以使用execinfo.h中的backtrace()函数打印堆栈跟踪，并在出现分段错误时优雅地退出。文档可以在libc手册中找到。

下面是一个示例程序，它安装了一个SIGSEGV处理程序，并在发生段错误时将堆栈跟踪输出到stderr。这里的baz()函数会导致触发处理程序的段错误:

#include <stdio.h>
#include <execinfo.h>
#include <signal.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>


void handler(int sig) {
  void *array[10];
  size_t size;

  // get void*'s for all entries on the stack
  size = backtrace(array, 10);

  // print out all the frames to stderr
  fprintf(stderr, "Error: signal %d:\n", sig);
  backtrace_symbols_fd(array, size, STDERR_FILENO);
  exit(1);
}

void baz() {
 int *foo = (int*)-1; // make a bad pointer
  printf("%d\n", *foo);       // causes segfault
}

void bar() { baz(); }
void foo() { bar(); }


int main(int argc, char **argv) {
  signal(SIGSEGV, handler);   // install our handler
  foo(); // this will call foo, bar, and baz.  baz segfaults.
}

使用-g -rdynamic编译可以在输出中获得符号信息，glibc可以使用它来创建一个漂亮的stacktrace:

$ gcc -g -rdynamic ./test.c -o test

执行此命令将得到以下输出:

$ ./test
Error: signal 11:
./test(handler+0x19)[0x400911]
/lib64/tls/libc.so.6[0x3a9b92e380]
./test(baz+0x14)[0x400962]
./test(bar+0xe)[0x400983]
./test(foo+0xe)[0x400993]
./test(main+0x28)[0x4009bd]
/lib64/tls/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xdb)[0x3a9b91c4bb]
./test[0x40086a]

这显示了堆栈中每个帧的加载模块、偏移量和函数。在这里，您可以看到信号处理程序位于堆栈顶部，除了main、foo、bar和baz之外，还在main之前有libc函数。

作为一种仅适用于Windows的解决方案，您可以使用Windows错误报告(Error Reporting)获得相当于堆栈跟踪的信息(包含多得多的信息)。只需几个注册表项，就可以设置为收集用户模式转储:

从Windows Server 2008和Windows Vista with Service Pack 1 (SP1)开始，可以配置Windows错误报告(WER)，以便在用户模式应用程序崩溃后收集完整的用户模式转储并存储在本地。[…] 默认情况下不启用此特性。启用该特性需要管理员权限。要启用和配置该功能，请在HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\Windows Error Reporting\LocalDumps键下使用以下注册表值。

您可以从具有所需权限的安装程序中设置注册表项。

创建用户模式转储比在客户端生成堆栈跟踪有以下优点:

It's already implemented in the system. You can either use WER as outlined above, or call MiniDumpWriteDump yourself, if you need more fine-grained control over the amount of information to dump. (Make sure to call it from a different process.) Way more complete than a stack trace. Among others it can contain local variables, function arguments, stacks for other threads, loaded modules, and so on. The amount of data (and consequently size) is highly customizable. No need to ship debug symbols. This both drastically decreases the size of your deployment, as well as makes it harder to reverse-engineer your application. Largely independent of the compiler you use. Using WER does not even require any code. Either way, having a way to get a symbol database (PDB) is very useful for offline analysis. I believe GCC can either generate PDB's, or there are tools to convert the symbol database to the PDB format.

请注意，WER只能由应用程序崩溃触发(即系统由于未处理的异常而终止进程)。MiniDumpWriteDump可以在任何时候调用。如果您需要转储当前状态以诊断崩溃以外的问题，这可能会很有帮助。

如果你想评估mini dump的适用性，必读:

有效minidumps 有效的小排量(第二部分)