我正在试验这种代码优先的方法,但我现在发现类型System的属性。Decimal被映射到Decimal(18,0)类型的sql列。
如何设置数据库列的精度?
我正在试验这种代码优先的方法,但我现在发现类型System的属性。Decimal被映射到Decimal(18,0)类型的sql列。
如何设置数据库列的精度?
当前回答
编辑,从。net 6开始,这可以用precision属性代替
(精密(精度、规模))
EF Core之前的版本:
[列(TypeName = "十进制(精度,比例)")]
定义:
精度=使用的字符总数
刻度=点后的总数。(容易混淆)
例子:
using System.ComponentModel.DataAnnotations; //.Net Core
using Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore; //.NET 6+
public class Blog
{
public int BlogId { get; set; }
[Column(TypeName = "varchar(200)")]
public string Url { get; set; }
[Column(TypeName = "decimal(5, 2)")]
public decimal Rating { get; set; }
[Precision(28, 8)]
public decimal RatingV6 { get; set; }
}
更多详情请访问:https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/ef/core/modeling/relational/data-types
其他回答
Dave Van den Eynde给出的答案现在已经过时了。有2个重要的变化,从EF 4.1开始,ModelBuilder类现在是DbModelBuilder,现在有一个DecimalPropertyConfiguration。HasPrecision方法,其签名为:
public DecimalPropertyConfiguration HasPrecision(
byte precision,
byte scale )
其中精度是db将存储的数字总数,而不管小数点落在哪里,scale是它将存储的小数位数。
因此,不需要像所示那样遍历属性,只需要从属性调用即可
public class EFDbContext : DbContext
{
protected override void OnModelCreating(System.Data.Entity.DbModelBuilder modelBuilder)
{
modelBuilder.Entity<Class>().Property(object => object.property).HasPrecision(12, 10);
base.OnModelCreating(modelBuilder);
}
}
使用KinSlayerUY的DecimalPrecisonAttribute,在EF6中,你可以创建一个惯例,它将处理具有该属性的单个属性(而不是像这个答案中那样设置DecimalPropertyConvention,这会影响所有的十进制属性)。
[AttributeUsage(AttributeTargets.Property, Inherited = false, AllowMultiple = false)]
public sealed class DecimalPrecisionAttribute : Attribute
{
public DecimalPrecisionAttribute(byte precision, byte scale)
{
Precision = precision;
Scale = scale;
}
public byte Precision { get; set; }
public byte Scale { get; set; }
}
public class DecimalPrecisionAttributeConvention
: PrimitivePropertyAttributeConfigurationConvention<DecimalPrecisionAttribute>
{
public override void Apply(ConventionPrimitivePropertyConfiguration configuration, DecimalPrecisionAttribute attribute)
{
if (attribute.Precision < 1 || attribute.Precision > 38)
{
throw new InvalidOperationException("Precision must be between 1 and 38.");
}
if (attribute.Scale > attribute.Precision)
{
throw new InvalidOperationException("Scale must be between 0 and the Precision value.");
}
configuration.HasPrecision(attribute.Precision, attribute.Scale);
}
}
然后在DbContext中:
protected override void OnModelCreating(DbModelBuilder modelBuilder)
{
modelBuilder.Conventions.Add(new DecimalPrecisionAttributeConvention());
}
你总是可以告诉EF在OnModelCreating函数中的Context类中使用约定来做到这一点,如下所示:
protected override void OnModelCreating(DbModelBuilder modelBuilder)
{
// <... other configurations ...>
// modelBuilder.Conventions.Remove<PluralizingTableNameConvention>();
// modelBuilder.Conventions.Remove<ManyToManyCascadeDeleteConvention>();
// modelBuilder.Conventions.Remove<OneToManyCascadeDeleteConvention>();
// Configure Decimal to always have a precision of 18 and a scale of 4
modelBuilder.Conventions.Remove<DecimalPropertyConvention>();
modelBuilder.Conventions.Add(new DecimalPropertyConvention(18, 4));
base.OnModelCreating(modelBuilder);
}
这只适用于Code First EF fyi,并适用于映射到db的所有十进制类型。
KinSlayerUY的自定义属性为我工作得很好,但我有复杂类型的问题。它们在属性代码中被映射为实体,因此不能被映射为ComplexType。
因此,我扩展了代码以允许这样做:
public static void OnModelCreating(DbModelBuilder modelBuilder)
{
foreach (Type classType in from t in Assembly.GetAssembly(typeof(DecimalPrecisionAttribute)).GetTypes()
where t.IsClass && t.Namespace == "FA.f1rstval.Data"
select t)
{
foreach (var propAttr in classType.GetProperties(BindingFlags.Public | BindingFlags.Instance).Where(p => p.GetCustomAttribute<DecimalPrecisionAttribute>() != null).Select(
p => new { prop = p, attr = p.GetCustomAttribute<DecimalPrecisionAttribute>(true) }))
{
ParameterExpression param = ParameterExpression.Parameter(classType, "c");
Expression property = Expression.Property(param, propAttr.prop.Name);
LambdaExpression lambdaExpression = Expression.Lambda(property, true,
new ParameterExpression[] { param });
DecimalPropertyConfiguration decimalConfig;
int MethodNum;
if (propAttr.prop.PropertyType.IsGenericType && propAttr.prop.PropertyType.GetGenericTypeDefinition() == typeof(Nullable<>))
{
MethodNum = 7;
}
else
{
MethodNum = 6;
}
//check if complextype
if (classType.GetCustomAttribute<ComplexTypeAttribute>() != null)
{
var complexConfig = modelBuilder.GetType().GetMethod("ComplexType").MakeGenericMethod(classType).Invoke(modelBuilder, null);
MethodInfo methodInfo = complexConfig.GetType().GetMethods().Where(p => p.Name == "Property").ToList()[MethodNum];
decimalConfig = methodInfo.Invoke(complexConfig, new[] { lambdaExpression }) as DecimalPropertyConfiguration;
}
else
{
var entityConfig = modelBuilder.GetType().GetMethod("Entity").MakeGenericMethod(classType).Invoke(modelBuilder, null);
MethodInfo methodInfo = entityConfig.GetType().GetMethods().Where(p => p.Name == "Property").ToList()[MethodNum];
decimalConfig = methodInfo.Invoke(entityConfig, new[] { lambdaExpression }) as DecimalPropertyConfiguration;
}
decimalConfig.HasPrecision(propAttr.attr.Precision, propAttr.attr.Scale);
}
}
}
@Mark007,我已经改变了DbContext的DbSet<>属性的类型选择标准。我认为这是更安全的,因为有时在给定的名称空间中有类不应该是模型定义的一部分,或者它们是但不是实体。或者您的实体可以驻留在单独的名称空间或单独的程序集中,并被拉到一个Context中。
另外,尽管不太可能,但我认为依赖于方法定义的顺序是不安全的,因此最好使用by Parameter列表将它们拉出来。(. gettypemethods()是我构建的一个扩展方法,用于使用新的TypeInfo范式,可以在查找方法时平铺类层次结构)。
请注意OnModelCreating委托给这个方法:
private void OnModelCreatingSetDecimalPrecisionFromAttribute(DbModelBuilder modelBuilder)
{
foreach (var iSetProp in this.GetType().GetTypeProperties(true))
{
if (iSetProp.PropertyType.IsGenericType
&& (iSetProp.PropertyType.GetGenericTypeDefinition() == typeof(IDbSet<>) || iSetProp.PropertyType.GetGenericTypeDefinition() == typeof(DbSet<>)))
{
var entityType = iSetProp.PropertyType.GetGenericArguments()[0];
foreach (var propAttr in entityType
.GetProperties(BindingFlags.Public | BindingFlags.Instance)
.Select(p => new { prop = p, attr = p.GetCustomAttribute<DecimalPrecisionAttribute>(true) })
.Where(propAttr => propAttr.attr != null))
{
var entityTypeConfigMethod = modelBuilder.GetType().GetTypeInfo().DeclaredMethods.First(m => m.Name == "Entity");
var entityTypeConfig = entityTypeConfigMethod.MakeGenericMethod(entityType).Invoke(modelBuilder, null);
var param = ParameterExpression.Parameter(entityType, "c");
var lambdaExpression = Expression.Lambda(Expression.Property(param, propAttr.prop.Name), true, new ParameterExpression[] { param });
var propertyConfigMethod =
entityTypeConfig.GetType()
.GetTypeMethods(true, false)
.First(m =>
{
if (m.Name != "Property")
return false;
var methodParams = m.GetParameters();
return methodParams.Length == 1 && methodParams[0].ParameterType == lambdaExpression.GetType();
}
);
var decimalConfig = propertyConfigMethod.Invoke(entityTypeConfig, new[] { lambdaExpression }) as DecimalPropertyConfiguration;
decimalConfig.HasPrecision(propAttr.attr.Precision, propAttr.attr.Scale);
}
}
}
}
public static IEnumerable<MethodInfo> GetTypeMethods(this Type typeToQuery, bool flattenHierarchy, bool? staticMembers)
{
var typeInfo = typeToQuery.GetTypeInfo();
foreach (var iField in typeInfo.DeclaredMethods.Where(fi => staticMembers == null || fi.IsStatic == staticMembers))
yield return iField;
//this bit is just for StaticFields so we pass flag to flattenHierarchy and for the purpose of recursion, restrictStatic = false
if (flattenHierarchy == true)
{
var baseType = typeInfo.BaseType;
if ((baseType != null) && (baseType != typeof(object)))
{
foreach (var iField in baseType.GetTypeMethods(true, staticMembers))
yield return iField;
}
}
}