我有一个React组件,在组件的渲染方法中,我有这样的东西:

render() {
    return (
        <div>
            <div>
                // removed for brevity
            </div>

           { switch(...) {} }

            <div>
                // removed for brevity
            </div>
        </div>
    );
}

Now the point is that I have two div elements, one at the top and one at the bottom, that are fixed. In the middle I want to have a switch statement, and according to a value in my state I want to render a different component. So basically, I want the two div elements to be fixed always, and just in the middle to render a different component each time. I'm using this to implement a multi-step payment procedure). Though, as is the code currently it doesn't work, as it gives me an error saying that switch is unexpected. Any ideas how to achieve what I want?


当前回答

我真的很喜欢https://stackoverflow.com/a/60313570/770134中的建议,所以我把它改成了Typescript

import React, { FunctionComponent } from 'react'
import { Optional } from "typescript-optional";
const { ofNullable } = Optional

interface SwitchProps {
  test: string
  defaultComponent: JSX.Element
}

export const Switch: FunctionComponent<SwitchProps> = (props) => {
  return ofNullable(props.children)
    .map((children) => {
      return ofNullable((children as JSX.Element[]).find((child) => child.props['value'] === props.test))
        .orElse(props.defaultComponent)
    })
    .orElseThrow(() => new Error('Children are required for a switch component'))
}

const Foo = ({ value = "foo" }) => <div>foo</div>;
const Bar = ({ value = "bar" }) => <div>bar</div>;
const value = "foo";
const SwitchExample = <Switch test={value} defaultComponent={<div />}>
  <Foo />
  <Bar />
</Switch>;

其他回答

这是因为switch语句是一个语句,但这里javascript需要一个表达式。

虽然,不建议在呈现方法中使用switch语句,但你可以使用自调用函数来实现这一点:

render() {
    // Don't forget to return a value in a switch statement
    return (
        <div>
            {(() => {
                switch(...) {}
            })()}
        </div>
    );
}

我真的很喜欢https://stackoverflow.com/a/60313570/770134中的建议,所以我把它改成了Typescript

import React, { FunctionComponent } from 'react'
import { Optional } from "typescript-optional";
const { ofNullable } = Optional

interface SwitchProps {
  test: string
  defaultComponent: JSX.Element
}

export const Switch: FunctionComponent<SwitchProps> = (props) => {
  return ofNullable(props.children)
    .map((children) => {
      return ofNullable((children as JSX.Element[]).find((child) => child.props['value'] === props.test))
        .orElse(props.defaultComponent)
    })
    .orElseThrow(() => new Error('Children are required for a switch component'))
}

const Foo = ({ value = "foo" }) => <div>foo</div>;
const Bar = ({ value = "bar" }) => <div>bar</div>;
const value = "foo";
const SwitchExample = <Switch test={value} defaultComponent={<div />}>
  <Foo />
  <Bar />
</Switch>;

React组件中的Switch-Case语句可以如下使用:

<div  id="time-list">
{   
    (() => {
        switch (groupByFilterId) {
            case 0:/*Case 0 */
                return (
                    <div>Case 0</div>
                )
               break;
           case 1: /*Case 1 */
           return ( 
            <div>Case 1</div>
            )
            break;
           case 2:/*Case 2 */
           return ( 
            <div>Case 2</div>
            )
            break;
        }
     })()}

      
       
    
    </div>

这个答案专门用来解决@tonyfat提出的“重复”问题,关于如何使用条件表达式来处理相同的任务。


Avoiding statements here seems like more trouble than it's worth, but this script does the job as the snippet demonstrates:

// Runs tests let id = 0, flag = 0; renderByFlag(id, flag); // jobId out of range id = 1; // jobId in range while(++flag < 5){ // active flag ranges from 1 to 4 renderByFlag(id, flag); } // Defines a function that chooses what to render based on two provided values function renderByFlag(jobId, activeFlag){ jobId === 1 ? ( activeFlag === 1 ? render("A (flag = 1)") : activeFlag === 2 ? render("B (flag = 2)") : activeFlag === 3 ? render("C (flag = 3)") : pass(`flag ${activeFlag} out of range`) ) : pass(`jobId ${jobId} out of range`) } // Defines logging functions for demo purposes function render(val){ console.log(`Rendering ${val}`); } function pass(reason){ console.log(`Doing nothing (${reason})`) }

改进了一点 马特·韦的回答。

export const Switch = ({ test, children }) => { const defaultResult = children.find((child) => child.props.default) || null; const result = children.find((child) => child.props.value === test); return result || defaultResult; }; export const Case = ({ children }) => children; const color = getColorFromTheMostComplexFnEver(); <Switch test={color}> <Case value="Green">Forest</Case> <Case value="Red">Blood</Case> <Case default>Predator</Case> </Switch> <script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/16.6.3/umd/react.production.min.js"></script> <script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react-dom/16.6.3/umd/react-dom.production.min.js"></script>