不，但是它们可以通过代理和反射来伪装:

  public static class TestClass {
      public String knockKnock() {
          return "who's there?";
      }
  }

  private final TestClass testInstance = new TestClass();

  @Test public void
  can_delegate_a_single_method_interface_to_an_instance() throws Exception {
      Delegator<TestClass, Callable<String>> knockKnockDelegator = Delegator.ofMethod("knockKnock")
                                                                   .of(TestClass.class)
                                                                   .to(Callable.class);
      Callable<String> callable = knockKnockDelegator.delegateTo(testInstance);
      assertThat(callable.call(), is("who's there?"));
  }

这种习惯用法的好处在于，您可以在创建委托器时验证委托方法是否存在，并具有所需的签名(不幸的是，在编译时不存在，尽管FindBugs插件在这里可能会有所帮助)，然后安全地使用它来委托给各种实例。

有关更多测试和实现，请参阅github上的karg代码。

根据您的意思，您可以使用策略模式达到类似的效果(传递一个方法)。

而不是像这样的一行声明一个命名方法签名:

// C#
public delegate void SomeFunction();

声明一个接口:

// Java
public interface ISomeBehaviour {
   void SomeFunction();
}

对于方法的具体实现，定义一个实现行为的类:

// Java
public class TypeABehaviour implements ISomeBehaviour {
   public void SomeFunction() {
      // TypeA behaviour
   }
}

public class TypeBBehaviour implements ISomeBehaviour {
   public void SomeFunction() {
      // TypeB behaviour
   }
}

然后在c#中使用SomeFunction委托的地方，使用ISomeBehaviour引用:

// C#
SomeFunction doSomething = SomeMethod;
doSomething();
doSomething = SomeOtherMethod;
doSomething();

// Java
ISomeBehaviour someBehaviour = new TypeABehaviour();
someBehaviour.SomeFunction();
someBehaviour = new TypeBBehaviour();
someBehaviour.SomeFunction();

使用匿名内部类，您甚至可以避免声明单独的命名类，几乎可以将它们视为真正的委托函数。

// Java
public void SomeMethod(ISomeBehaviour pSomeBehaviour) {
   ...
}

...

SomeMethod(new ISomeBehaviour() { 
   @Override
   public void SomeFunction() {
      // your implementation
   }
});

这可能只应该在实现非常特定于当前上下文并且不会从重用中受益时使用。

当然，在Java 8中，这些基本变成了lambda表达式:

// Java 8
SomeMethod(() -> { /* your implementation */ });

你读过这篇文章吗?

Delegates are a useful construct in event-based systems. Essentially Delegates are objects that encode a method dispatch on a specified object. This document shows how java inner classes provide a more generic solution to such problems. What is a Delegate? Really it is very similar to a pointer to member function as used in C++. But a delegate contains the target object alongwith the method to be invoked. Ideally it would be nice to be able to say: obj.registerHandler(ano.methodOne); ..and that the method methodOne would be called on ano when some specific event was received. This is what the Delegate structure achieves. Java Inner Classes It has been argued that Java provides this functionality via anonymous inner classes and thus does not need the additional Delegate construct.

obj.registerHandler(new Handler() {
        public void handleIt(Event ev) {
            methodOne(ev);
        }
      } );

At first glance this seems correct but at the same time a nuisance. Because for many event processing examples the simplicity of the Delegates syntax is very attractive. General Handler However, if event-based programming is used in a more pervasive manner, say, for example, as a part of a general asynchronous programming environment, there is more at stake. In such a general situation, it is not sufficient to include only the target method and target object instance. In general there may be other parameters required, that are determined within the context when the event handler is registered. In this more general situation, the java approach can provide a very elegant solution, particularly when combined with use of final variables:

void processState(final T1 p1, final T2 dispatch) { 
  final int a1 = someCalculation();

  m_obj.registerHandler(new Handler() {
    public void handleIt(Event ev) {
     dispatch.methodOne(a1, ev, p1);
    }
  } );
}

final * final * final Got your attention? Note that the final variables are accessible from within the anonymous class method definitions. Be sure to study this code carefully to understand the ramifications. This is potentially a very powerful technique. For example, it can be used to good effect when registering handlers in MiniDOM and in more general situations. By contrast, the Delegate construct does not provide a solution for this more general requirement, and as such should be rejected as an idiom on which designs can be based.

所描述的代码提供了c#委托的许多优点。方法，无论是静态的还是动态的，都可以以统一的方式处理。通过反射调用方法的复杂性降低了，而且代码是可重用的，因为在用户代码中不需要额外的类。请注意，我们调用的是invoke的另一个方便版本，其中只带一个参数的方法可以在不创建对象数组的情况下被调用。

  class Class1 {
        public void show(String s) { System.out.println(s); }
    }

    class Class2 {
        public void display(String s) { System.out.println(s); }
    }

    // allows static method as well
    class Class3 {
        public static void staticDisplay(String s) { System.out.println(s); }
    }

    public class TestDelegate  {
        public static final Class[] OUTPUT_ARGS = { String.class };
        public final Delegator DO_SHOW = new Delegator(OUTPUT_ARGS,Void.TYPE);

        public void main(String[] args)  {
            Delegate[] items = new Delegate[3];

            items[0] = DO_SHOW .build(new Class1(),"show,);
            items[1] = DO_SHOW.build (new Class2(),"display");
            items[2] = DO_SHOW.build(Class3.class, "staticDisplay");

            for(int i = 0; i < items.length; i++) {
                items[i].invoke("Hello World");
            }
        }
    }

没有，没有。

你可以通过使用反射来获得你可以调用的Method对象来达到同样的效果，另一种方法是创建一个带有单个“invoke”或“execute”方法的接口，然后实例化它们来调用你感兴趣的方法(即使用匿名内部类)。

你可能还会发现这篇文章很有趣/有用:一个Java程序员看c#委托(@blueskyprojects.com)

简短的故事:没有。

Introduction The newest version of the Microsoft Visual J++ development environment supports a language construct called delegates or bound method references. This construct, and the new keywords delegate and multicast introduced to support it, are not a part of the JavaTM programming language, which is specified by the Java Language Specification and amended by the Inner Classes Specification included in the documentation for the JDKTM 1.1 software. It is unlikely that the Java programming language will ever include this construct. Sun already carefully considered adopting it in 1996, to the extent of building and discarding working prototypes. Our conclusion was that bound method references are unnecessary and detrimental to the language. This decision was made in consultation with Borland International, who had previous experience with bound method references in Delphi Object Pascal. We believe bound method references are unnecessary because another design alternative, inner classes, provides equal or superior functionality. In particular, inner classes fully support the requirements of user-interface event handling, and have been used to implement a user-interface API at least as comprehensive as the Windows Foundation Classes. We believe bound method references are harmful because they detract from the simplicity of the Java programming language and the pervasively object-oriented character of the APIs. Bound method references also introduce irregularity into the language syntax and scoping rules. Finally, they dilute the investment in VM technologies because VMs are required to handle additional and disparate types of references and method linkage efficiently.