我如何使用Assert(或其他测试类)来验证在使用MSTest/Microsoft.VisualStudio.TestTools.UnitTesting时抛出了异常?
当前回答
如果你使用NUNIT,你可以这样做:
Assert.Throws<ExpectedException>(() => methodToTest());
也可以存储抛出的异常以便进一步验证:
ExpectedException ex = Assert.Throws<ExpectedException>(() => methodToTest());
Assert.AreEqual( "Expected message text.", ex.Message );
Assert.AreEqual( 5, ex.SomeNumber);
参见:http://nunit.org/docs/2.5/exceptionAsserts.html
其他回答
这取决于您使用的测试框架?
例如,在MbUnit中,您可以用一个属性指定预期的异常,以确保您得到的是真正预期的异常。
[ExpectedException(typeof(ArgumentException))]
Even though this is an old question, I would like to add a new thought to the discussion. I have extended the Arrange, Act, Assert pattern to be Expected, Arrange, Act, Assert. You can make an expected exception pointer, then assert it was assigned to. This feels cleaner than doing your Asserts in a catch block, leaving your Act section mostly just for the one line of code to call the method under test. You also don't have to Assert.Fail(); or return from multiple points in the code. Any other exception thrown will cause the test to fail, because it won't be caught, and if an exception of your expected type is thrown, but the it wasn't the one you were expecting, Asserting against the message or other properties of the exception help make sure your test won't pass inadvertently.
[TestMethod]
public void Bar_InvalidDependency_ThrowsInvalidOperationException()
{
// Expectations
InvalidOperationException expectedException = null;
string expectedExceptionMessage = "Bar did something invalid.";
// Arrange
IDependency dependency = DependencyMocks.Create();
Foo foo = new Foo(dependency);
// Act
try
{
foo.Bar();
}
catch (InvalidOperationException ex)
{
expectedException = ex;
}
// Assert
Assert.IsNotNull(expectedException);
Assert.AreEqual(expectedExceptionMessage, expectedException.Message);
}
您可以通过简单的一行代码来实现这一点。
如果你的foo.bar()操作是异步的:
await Assert.ThrowsExceptionAsync<Exception>(() => foo.bar());
如果foo.bar()不是异步的
Assert.ThrowsException<Exception>(() => foo.bar());
对于“Visual Studio Team Test”,似乎您将ExpectedException属性应用到测试的方法。
文档中的示例:使用Visual Studio团队测试的单元测试演练
[TestMethod]
[ExpectedException(typeof(ArgumentException),
"A userId of null was inappropriately allowed.")]
public void NullUserIdInConstructor()
{
LogonInfo logonInfo = new LogonInfo(null, "P@ss0word");
}
这是测试方法的一个属性…你不使用Assert。看起来是这样的:
[ExpectedException(typeof(ExceptionType))]
public void YourMethod_should_throw_exception()
推荐文章
- 实体框架核心:在上一个操作完成之前,在此上下文中开始的第二个操作
- 如何为构造函数定制Visual Studio的私有字段生成快捷方式?
- 为什么Visual Studio 2015/2017/2019测试运行器没有发现我的xUnit v2测试
- 如何使用JSON确保字符串是有效的JSON。网
- AppSettings从.config文件中获取值
- 通过HttpClient向REST API发布一个空体
- 如何检查IEnumerable是否为空或空?
- 自动化invokerrequired代码模式
- 在c#代码中设置WPF文本框的背景颜色
- 在c#中,什么是单子?
- 单元测试反模式目录
- c#和Java中的泛型有什么不同?和模板在c++ ?
- c#线程安全快速(est)计数器
- 如何将此foreach代码转换为Parallel.ForEach?
- 如何分裂()一个分隔字符串到一个列表<字符串>