我正在用c#写一个程序,需要反复访问1个图像文件。大多数时候它是有效的,但如果我的计算机运行得很快,它会在文件保存回文件系统之前尝试访问该文件,并抛出一个错误:
文件正在被另一个进程使用
我想找到一个解决这个问题的方法,但我在谷歌上的所有搜索都只能通过使用异常处理来创建检查。这违背了我的宗教信仰,所以我想知道有没有更好的方法?
我正在用c#写一个程序,需要反复访问1个图像文件。大多数时候它是有效的,但如果我的计算机运行得很快,它会在文件保存回文件系统之前尝试访问该文件,并抛出一个错误:
文件正在被另一个进程使用
我想找到一个解决这个问题的方法,但我在谷歌上的所有搜索都只能通过使用异常处理来创建检查。这违背了我的宗教信仰,所以我想知道有没有更好的方法?
当前回答
你可以使用我的库来访问多个应用程序中的文件。
您可以从nuget: install - package Xabe安装它。FileLock
如果你想了解更多信息,请检查 https://github.com/tomaszzmuda/Xabe.FileLock
ILock fileLock = new FileLock(file);
if(fileLock.Acquire(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(15), true))
{
using(fileLock)
{
// file operations here
}
}
fileLock。Acquire方法仅当可以锁定该对象的文件独占时才返回true。 但是上传文件的应用程序也必须在文件锁中进行上传。 如果对象不可访问,方法返回false。
其他回答
下面是一些代码,据我所知,它与接受的答案相同,但代码更少:
public static bool IsFileLocked(string file)
{
try
{
using (var stream = File.OpenRead(file))
return false;
}
catch (IOException)
{
return true;
}
}
然而,我认为用以下方式来做会更稳健:
public static void TryToDoWithFileStream(string file, Action<FileStream> action,
int count, int msecTimeOut)
{
FileStream stream = null;
for (var i = 0; i < count; ++i)
{
try
{
stream = File.OpenRead(file);
break;
}
catch (IOException)
{
Thread.Sleep(msecTimeOut);
}
}
action(stream);
}
使用此命令检查文件是否被锁定:
using System.IO;
using System.Runtime.InteropServices;
internal static class Helper
{
const int ERROR_SHARING_VIOLATION = 32;
const int ERROR_LOCK_VIOLATION = 33;
private static bool IsFileLocked(Exception exception)
{
int errorCode = Marshal.GetHRForException(exception) & ((1 << 16) - 1);
return errorCode == ERROR_SHARING_VIOLATION || errorCode == ERROR_LOCK_VIOLATION;
}
internal static bool CanReadFile(string filePath)
{
//Try-Catch so we dont crash the program and can check the exception
try {
//The "using" is important because FileStream implements IDisposable and
//"using" will avoid a heap exhaustion situation when too many handles
//are left undisposed.
using (FileStream fileStream = File.Open(filePath, FileMode.Open, FileAccess.ReadWrite, FileShare.None)) {
if (fileStream != null) fileStream.Close(); //This line is me being overly cautious, fileStream will never be null unless an exception occurs... and I know the "using" does it but its helpful to be explicit - especially when we encounter errors - at least for me anyway!
}
}
catch (IOException ex) {
//THE FUNKY MAGIC - TO SEE IF THIS FILE REALLY IS LOCKED!!!
if (IsFileLocked(ex)) {
// do something, eg File.Copy or present the user with a MsgBox - I do not recommend Killing the process that is locking the file
return false;
}
}
finally
{ }
return true;
}
}
出于性能考虑,我建议您在同一操作中读取文件内容。下面是一些例子:
public static byte[] ReadFileBytes(string filePath)
{
byte[] buffer = null;
try
{
using (FileStream fileStream = File.Open(filePath, FileMode.Open, FileAccess.ReadWrite, FileShare.None))
{
int length = (int)fileStream.Length; // get file length
buffer = new byte[length]; // create buffer
int count; // actual number of bytes read
int sum = 0; // total number of bytes read
// read until Read method returns 0 (end of the stream has been reached)
while ((count = fileStream.Read(buffer, sum, length - sum)) > 0)
sum += count; // sum is a buffer offset for next reading
fileStream.Close(); //This is not needed, just me being paranoid and explicitly releasing resources ASAP
}
}
catch (IOException ex)
{
//THE FUNKY MAGIC - TO SEE IF THIS FILE REALLY IS LOCKED!!!
if (IsFileLocked(ex))
{
// do something?
}
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
}
finally
{
}
return buffer;
}
public static string ReadFileTextWithEncoding(string filePath)
{
string fileContents = string.Empty;
byte[] buffer;
try
{
using (FileStream fileStream = File.Open(filePath, FileMode.Open, FileAccess.ReadWrite, FileShare.None))
{
int length = (int)fileStream.Length; // get file length
buffer = new byte[length]; // create buffer
int count; // actual number of bytes read
int sum = 0; // total number of bytes read
// read until Read method returns 0 (end of the stream has been reached)
while ((count = fileStream.Read(buffer, sum, length - sum)) > 0)
{
sum += count; // sum is a buffer offset for next reading
}
fileStream.Close(); //Again - this is not needed, just me being paranoid and explicitly releasing resources ASAP
//Depending on the encoding you wish to use - I'll leave that up to you
fileContents = System.Text.Encoding.Default.GetString(buffer);
}
}
catch (IOException ex)
{
//THE FUNKY MAGIC - TO SEE IF THIS FILE REALLY IS LOCKED!!!
if (IsFileLocked(ex))
{
// do something?
}
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
}
finally
{ }
return fileContents;
}
public static string ReadFileTextNoEncoding(string filePath)
{
string fileContents = string.Empty;
byte[] buffer;
try
{
using (FileStream fileStream = File.Open(filePath, FileMode.Open, FileAccess.ReadWrite, FileShare.None))
{
int length = (int)fileStream.Length; // get file length
buffer = new byte[length]; // create buffer
int count; // actual number of bytes read
int sum = 0; // total number of bytes read
// read until Read method returns 0 (end of the stream has been reached)
while ((count = fileStream.Read(buffer, sum, length - sum)) > 0)
{
sum += count; // sum is a buffer offset for next reading
}
fileStream.Close(); //Again - this is not needed, just me being paranoid and explicitly releasing resources ASAP
char[] chars = new char[buffer.Length / sizeof(char) + 1];
System.Buffer.BlockCopy(buffer, 0, chars, 0, buffer.Length);
fileContents = new string(chars);
}
}
catch (IOException ex)
{
//THE FUNKY MAGIC - TO SEE IF THIS FILE REALLY IS LOCKED!!!
if (IsFileLocked(ex))
{
// do something?
}
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
}
finally
{
}
return fileContents;
}
你自己试试吧:
byte[] output1 = Helper.ReadFileBytes(@"c:\temp\test.txt");
string output2 = Helper.ReadFileTextWithEncoding(@"c:\temp\test.txt");
string output3 = Helper.ReadFileTextNoEncoding(@"c:\temp\test.txt");
尝试将文件移动/复制到临时目录。如果可以的话,它没有锁,您可以安全地在临时目录中工作而不需要锁。否则就在x秒内再移动一次。
我所知道的唯一方法是使用Win32独占锁API,这不是太快,但例子存在。
对于大多数人来说,一个简单的解决方案就是尝试/捕捉/睡眠循环。
我最近遇到了这个问题,找到了这个:https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/standard/io/handling-io-errors。
在这里,微软描述了以下检查IOException是否由于锁定文件导致的方法:
catch (IOException e) when ((e.HResult & 0x0000FFFF) == 32 ) {
Console.WriteLine("There is a sharing violation.");
}