虽然Java语言中没有包含无符号字节看起来很烦人(来自C)，但这真的不是什么大问题，因为一个简单的“b & 0xFF”操作在(很少)实际需要的情况下为(有符号)字节b产生无符号值。比特实际上并没有改变——只是解释(这只在例如对值进行一些数学运算时很重要)。

如果你有一个函数必须传递一个有符号字节，如果你传递一个无符号字节，你期望它做什么?

为什么不能使用其他数据类型?

通常情况下，您可以使用一个字节作为一个无符号字节简单或不翻译。这完全取决于如何使用。你需要澄清你打算用它做什么。

在Java中，原语是有符号的，这与它们在内存/传输中的表示方式无关——一个字节只有8位，是否将其解释为有符号范围取决于您。没有神奇的旗帜说“这是有符号的”或“这是没有符号的”。

由于原语是有符号的，Java编译器将阻止您为字节分配大于+127的值(或小于-128的值)。然而，没有什么可以阻止你向下转换一个int型(或short型)来实现这一点:

int i = 200; // 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 1100 1000 (200)
byte b = (byte) 200; // 1100 1000 (-56 by Java specification, 200 by convention)

/*
 * Will print a negative int -56 because upcasting byte to int does
 * so called "sign extension" which yields those bits:
 * 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1100 1000 (-56)
 *
 * But you could still choose to interpret this as +200.
 */
System.out.println(b); // "-56"

/*
 * Will print a positive int 200 because bitwise AND with 0xFF will
 * zero all the 24 most significant bits that:
 * a) were added during upcasting to int which took place silently
 *    just before evaluating the bitwise AND operator.
 *    So the `b & 0xFF` is equivalent with `((int) b) & 0xFF`.
 * b) were set to 1s because of "sign extension" during the upcasting
 *
 * 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1100 1000 (the int)
 * &
 * 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 1111 1111 (the 0xFF)
 * =======================================
 * 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 1100 1000 (200)
 */
System.out.println(b & 0xFF); // "200"

/*
 * You would typically do this *within* the method that expected an 
 * unsigned byte and the advantage is you apply `0xFF` only once
 * and than you use the `unsignedByte` variable in all your bitwise
 * operations.
 *
 * You could use any integer type longer than `byte` for the `unsignedByte` variable,
 * i.e. `short`, `int`, `long` and even `char`, but during bitwise operations
 * it would get casted to `int` anyway.
 */
void printUnsignedByte(byte b) {
    int unsignedByte = b & 0xFF;
    System.out.println(unsignedByte); // "200"
}

我试图使用此数据作为参数的Java函数，只接受一个字节作为参数

这与函数接受一个大于2^32-1的整数并没有本质上的区别。

这听起来似乎取决于函数是如何定义和记录的;我认为有三种可能:

It may explicitly document that the function treats the byte as an unsigned value, in which case the function probably should do what you expect but would seem to be implemented wrong. For the integer case, the function would probably declare the parameter as an unsigned integer, but that is not possible for the byte case. It may document that the value for this argument must be greater than (or perhaps equal to) zero, in which case you are misusing the function (passing an out-of-range parameter), expecting it to do more than it was designed to do. With some level of debugging support you might expect the function to throw an exception or fail an assertion. The documentation may say nothing, in which case a negative parameter is, well, a negative parameter and whether that has any meaning depends on what the function does. If this is meaningless then perhaps the function should really be defined/documented as (2). If this is meaningful in an nonobvious manner (e.g. non-negative values are used to index into an array, and negative values are used to index back from the end of the array so -1 means the last element) the documentation should say what it means and I would expect that it isn't what you want it to do anyway.

Adamski提供了最好的答案，但它并不完整，所以阅读他的回复，因为它解释了我没有的细节。

如果你有一个系统函数需要传递一个无符号字节给它，你可以传递一个有符号字节，因为它会自动把它当作一个无符号字节。

因此，如果一个系统函数需要四个字节，例如，192 168 0 1作为无符号字节，您可以传递-64 -88 0 1，并且函数仍然可以工作，因为将它们传递给函数的行为将取消它们的符号。

然而，您不太可能遇到这个问题，因为系统函数隐藏在类后面以实现跨平台兼容性，尽管一些java。IO read方法返回一个int类型的未叹号字节。

如果您希望看到这种工作，请尝试将有符号字节写入文件，并将它们作为无符号字节读取回来。

由于Java中的限制，无符号字节在当前的数据类型格式中几乎是不可能的。你可以为你要实现的东西使用其他语言的其他库，然后你可以使用JNI调用它们。