对于S&G, linq化的方式:

var original = "(*^%foo)(@)&^@#><>?:\":';=-+_";
var valid = new char[] { 
    'a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e', 'f', 'g', 'h', 'i', 'j', 'k', 'l', 'm', 'n', 'o', 
    'p', 'q', 'r', 's', 't', 'u', 'v', 'w', 'x', 'y', 'z', 'A', 'B', 'C', 'D', 
    'E', 'F', 'G', 'H', 'I', 'J', 'K', 'L', 'M', 'N', 'O', 'P', 'Q', 'R', 'S', 
    'T', 'U', 'V', 'W', 'X', 'Y', 'Z', '1', '2', '3', '4', '5', '6', '7', '8', 
    '9', '0', '.', '_' };
var result = string.Join("",
    (from x in original.ToCharArray() 
     where valid.Contains(x) select x.ToString())
        .ToArray());

然而，我不认为这是最有效的方法。

我不确定这是最有效的方法，但对我来说很有效

 Public Function RemoverTildes(stIn As String) As String
    Dim stFormD As String = stIn.Normalize(NormalizationForm.FormD)
    Dim sb As New StringBuilder()

    For ich As Integer = 0 To stFormD.Length - 1
        Dim uc As UnicodeCategory = CharUnicodeInfo.GetUnicodeCategory(stFormD(ich))
        If uc <> UnicodeCategory.NonSpacingMark Then
            sb.Append(stFormD(ich))
        End If
    Next
    Return (sb.ToString().Normalize(NormalizationForm.FormC))
End Function

我觉得你的算法很有效。它是O(n)，并且只查看每个字符一次。除非你在检查它们之前神奇地知道它们的值，否则你不会比这更好。

但是，我将把StringBuilder的容量初始化为字符串的初始大小。我猜您认为的性能问题来自内存重新分配。

旁注:检查A-z并不安全。你要包括[，\，]，^，_和'…

旁注2:为了获得额外的效率，将比较按顺序排列，以减少比较的数量。(在最坏的情况下，你说的是8个比较，所以不要想太多。)这随你的预期输入而变化，但一个例子可以是:

if (str[i] >= '0' && str[i] <= 'z' && 
    (str[i] >= 'a' || str[i] <= '9' ||  (str[i] >= 'A' && str[i] <= 'Z') || 
    str[i] == '_') || str[i] == '.')

旁注3:如果出于某种原因，你真的需要它更快，那么switch语句可能更快。编译器应该为你创建一个跳转表，结果只有一个比较:

switch (str[i])
{
    case '0':
    case '1':
    .
    .
    .
    case '.':
        sb.Append(str[i]);
        break;
}

正则表达式如下所示:

public string RemoveSpecialChars(string input)
{
    return Regex.Replace(input, @"[^0-9a-zA-Z\._]", string.Empty);
}

但如果性能非常重要，我建议你在选择“正则表达式路径”之前做一些基准测试……

I had to do something similar for work, but in my case I had to filter all that is not a letter, number or whitespace (but you could easily modify it to your needs). The filtering is done client-side in JavaScript, but for security reasons I am also doing the filtering server-side. Since I can expect most of the strings to be clean, I would like to avoid copying the string unless I really need to. This let my to the implementation below, which should perform better for both clean and dirty strings.

public static string EnsureOnlyLetterDigitOrWhiteSpace(string input)
{
    StringBuilder cleanedInput = null;
    for (var i = 0; i < input.Length; ++i)
    {
        var currentChar = input[i];
        var charIsValid = char.IsLetterOrDigit(currentChar) || char.IsWhiteSpace(currentChar);

        if (charIsValid)
        {
            if(cleanedInput != null)
                cleanedInput.Append(currentChar);
        }
        else
        {
            if (cleanedInput != null) continue;
            cleanedInput = new StringBuilder();
            if (i > 0)
                cleanedInput.Append(input.Substring(0, i));
        }
    }

    return cleanedInput == null ? input : cleanedInput.ToString();
}

除非您真的需要从函数中挤出性能，否则就使用最容易维护和理解的方法。正则表达式是这样的:

为了获得额外的性能，您可以预先编译它，或者只是告诉它在第一次调用时编译(后续调用将更快)。

public static string RemoveSpecialCharacters(string str)
{
    return Regex.Replace(str, "[^a-zA-Z0-9_.]+", "", RegexOptions.Compiled);
}