我试着根据我对以下类比的理解来回答:

A database is like the house In the house there are several types of rooms. Assuming that you're living in a really big house. You really don't want your living rooms, bedrooms, bathrooms, mezzanines, treehouses, etc. to look the same. They each need a blueprint to tell how to build/use them. In other words, they each need a schema to tell how to build/use a bathroom, for example. Of course, you may have several bedrooms, each looks slightly different. You and your wife/husband's bedroom is slightly different from your kids' bedroom. Each bedroom is analogous to a table in your database. A DBMS is like a butler in the house. He manages literally everything.

模式是数据库对象的集合，其中也包括逻辑结构。 它具有拥有它的用户的名称。 一个数据库可以有任意数量的Schema。 数据库中的一个表可以出现在两个同名的不同模式中。 用户可以查看已为其分配选择特权的任何模式。

关系模式是表的逻辑定义——它定义了表的名称，以及每一列的名称和类型。就像一个计划或蓝图。数据库模式是整个数据库的关系模式的集合。

表是由一组行(又名“元组”)组成的结构，每一行都有由模式定义的属性。表上还可能有索引，以帮助查找某些列上的值。

从形式上讲，数据库是任何数据的集合。在这个上下文中，数据库将是表的集合。DBMS(数据库管理系统)是管理和运行数据库的软件(如MySQL, SQL Server, Oracle等)。

我试着根据我对以下类比的理解来回答:

A database is like the house In the house there are several types of rooms. Assuming that you're living in a really big house. You really don't want your living rooms, bedrooms, bathrooms, mezzanines, treehouses, etc. to look the same. They each need a blueprint to tell how to build/use them. In other words, they each need a schema to tell how to build/use a bathroom, for example. Of course, you may have several bedrooms, each looks slightly different. You and your wife/husband's bedroom is slightly different from your kids' bedroom. Each bedroom is analogous to a table in your database. A DBMS is like a butler in the house. He manages literally everything.

来自PostgreSQL文档:

A database contains one or more named schemas, which in turn contain tables. Schemas also contain other kinds of named objects, including data types, functions, and operators. The same object name can be used in different schemas without conflict; for example, both schema1 and myschema can contain tables named mytable. Unlike databases, schemas are not rigidly separated: a user can access objects in any of the schemas in the database he is connected to, if he has privileges to do so. There are several reasons why one might want to use schemas: To allow many users to use one database without interfering with each other. To organize database objects into logical groups to make them more manageable. Third-party applications can be put into separate schemas so they do not collide with the names of other objects. Schemas are analogous to directories at the operating system level, except that schemas cannot be nested.

与上面的一些答案相反，以下是我对他们每个人的经验的理解:

MySQL: database/schema:: table SQL Server: database::(schema/namespace::)表 Oracle: database/schema/user::(表空间::)

请纠正我关于表空间是否是可选的Oracle，这是很长一段时间以来，我记得使用他们。