例如，按偶数和奇数拆分列表

arr = range(20)
even, odd = reduce(lambda res, next: res[next % 2].append(next) or res, arr, ([], []))

或者概括地说:

def split(predicate, iterable):
    return reduce(lambda res, e: res[predicate(e)].append(e) or res, iterable, ([], []))

优点:

最短路径 Predicate对每个元素只应用一次

缺点

需要函数式编程范例的知识

受到@gnibbler伟大(但简洁!)回答的启发，我们可以应用该方法映射到多个分区:

from collections import defaultdict

def splitter(l, mapper):
    """Split an iterable into multiple partitions generated by a callable mapper."""

    results = defaultdict(list)

    for x in l:
        results[mapper(x)] += [x]

    return results

然后可以使用splitter，如下所示:

>>> l = [1, 2, 3, 4, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 4, 3, 2, 3]
>>> split = splitter(l, lambda x: x % 2 == 0)  # partition l into odds and evens
>>> split.items()
>>> [(False, [1, 3, 3, 5, 3, 3]), (True, [2, 4, 2, 4, 6, 4, 2])]

这适用于有更复杂映射的两个以上分区(也适用于迭代器):

>>> import math
>>> l = xrange(1, 23)
>>> split = splitter(l, lambda x: int(math.log10(x) * 5))
>>> split.items()
[(0, [1]),
 (1, [2]),
 (2, [3]),
 (3, [4, 5, 6]),
 (4, [7, 8, 9]),
 (5, [10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15]),
 (6, [16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22])]

或者用字典来映射:

>>> map = {'A': 1, 'X': 2, 'B': 3, 'Y': 1, 'C': 2, 'Z': 3}
>>> l = ['A', 'B', 'C', 'C', 'X', 'Y', 'Z', 'A', 'Z']
>>> split = splitter(l, map.get)
>>> split.items()
(1, ['A', 'Y', 'A']), (2, ['C', 'C', 'X']), (3, ['B', 'Z', 'Z'])]

为了提高性能，请尝试itertools。

itertools模块标准化了一组快速、内存高效的核心工具，这些工具单独使用或组合使用都很有用。它们一起构成了一个“迭代器代数”，使得用纯Python简洁有效地构造专门的工具成为可能。

出现看到itertools。过滤器或imap。

itertools。iterable ifilter(谓词) 创建一个迭代器，从iterable中过滤元素，只返回谓词为True的元素

这个问题已经有很多答案了，但似乎都不如我最喜欢的解决这个问题的方法，这种方法只遍历和测试每个项目一次，并使用列表理解的速度来构建两个输出列表之一，因此它只需要使用相对较慢的附加来构建一个输出列表:

bad = []
good = [x for x in mylist if x in goodvals or bad.append(x)]

In my answer to a similar question, I explain how this approach works (a combination of Python's greedy evaluation of or refraining from executing the append for "good" items, and append returning a false-like value which leaves the if condition false for "bad" items), and I show timeit results indicating that this approach outcompetes alternatives like those suggested here, especially in cases where the majority of items will go into the list built by list-comprehension (in this case, the good list).

一个基于生成器的版本，如果你能忍受一个或两个原始列表的反转。

设置…

random.seed(1234)
a = list(range(10))
random.shuffle(a)
a
[2, 8, 3, 5, 6, 4, 9, 0, 1, 7]

至于分裂……

(list((a.pop(j) for j, y in [(len(a)-i-1, x) for i,x in enumerate(a[::-1])] if y%2 == 0))[::-1], a)
([2, 8, 6, 4, 0], [3, 5, 9, 1, 7])

Another list of tuples of locations and each element is built in reverse order. In a generator wrapped round that each element is tested against the predicate (here test for even) and if True then the element is poped using previously computed locations. We are working backwards along the list so poping elements out does not change positions closer to the beginning of the list. A wrapping list() evaluates the generator and a final revers [::-1] puts the elements back in the right order. The original list "a" now only contains elements that for which the predicate is False.

有时候你并不需要清单上的另一半。 例如:

import sys
from itertools import ifilter

trustedPeople = sys.argv[1].split(',')
newName = sys.argv[2]

myFriends = ifilter(lambda x: x.startswith('Shi'), trustedPeople)

print '%s is %smy friend.' % (newName, newName not in myFriends 'not ' or '')