在_utf8_decode的两个实现中都有一些错误。C1和c2由于var语句的错误使用被赋值为全局变量，c3根本没有初始化或声明。

它可以工作，但这些变量将覆盖该函数之外的任何具有相同名称的现有变量。

这里有一个版本不会这样做:

// private method for UTF-8 decoding
_utf8_decode : function (utftext) {
    var string = "";
    var i = 0;
    var c = 0, c1 = 0, c2 = 0;

    while ( i < utftext.length ) {

        c = utftext.charCodeAt(i);

        if (c < 128) {
            string += String.fromCharCode(c);
            i++;
        }
        else if((c > 191) && (c < 224)) {
            c1 = utftext.charCodeAt(i+1);
            string += String.fromCharCode(((c & 31) << 6) | (c1 & 63));
            i += 2;
        }
        else {
            c1 = utftext.charCodeAt(i+1);
            c2 = utftext.charCodeAt(i+2);
            string += String.fromCharCode(((c & 15) << 12) | ((c1 & 63) << 6) | (c2 & 63));
            i += 3;
        }
    }
    return string;
}

基本上，我只是稍微清理了一下原始代码，这样JSLint就不会抱怨太多了，而且我把注释中标记为私有的方法实际上变成了私有的。我还添加了我在自己的项目中需要的两个方法，即decodeToHex和encodeFromHex。

代码:

var Base64 = (function() {
    "use strict";

    var _keyStr = "ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz0123456789+/=";

    var _utf8_encode = function (string) {

        var utftext = "", c, n;

        string = string.replace(/\r\n/g,"\n");

        for (n = 0; n < string.length; n++) {

            c = string.charCodeAt(n);

            if (c < 128) {

                utftext += String.fromCharCode(c);

            } else if((c > 127) && (c < 2048)) {

                utftext += String.fromCharCode((c >> 6) | 192);
                utftext += String.fromCharCode((c & 63) | 128);
            } else {

                utftext += String.fromCharCode((c >> 12) | 224);
                utftext += String.fromCharCode(((c >> 6) & 63) | 128);
                utftext += String.fromCharCode((c & 63) | 128);
            }
        }
        return utftext;
    };

    var _utf8_decode = function (utftext) {
        var string = "", i = 0, c = 0, c1 = 0, c2 = 0;

        while ( i < utftext.length ) {

            c = utftext.charCodeAt(i);

            if (c < 128) {

                string += String.fromCharCode(c);
                i++;

            } else if((c > 191) && (c < 224)) {

                c1 = utftext.charCodeAt(i+1);
                string += String.fromCharCode(((c & 31) << 6) | (c1 & 63));
                i += 2;

            } else {

                c1 = utftext.charCodeAt(i+1);
                c2 = utftext.charCodeAt(i+2);
                string += String.fromCharCode(((c & 15) << 12) | ((c1 & 63) << 6) | (c2 & 63));
                i += 3;
            }
        }
        return string;
    };

    var _hexEncode = function(input) {
        var output = '', i;

        for(i = 0; i < input.length; i++) {
            output += input.charCodeAt(i).toString(16);
        }

        return output;
    };

    var _hexDecode = function(input) {
        var output = '', i;

        if(input.length % 2 > 0) {
            input = '0' + input;
        }

        for(i = 0; i < input.length; i = i + 2) {
            output += String.fromCharCode(parseInt(input.charAt(i) + input.charAt(i + 1), 16));
        }
        return output;
    };

    var encode = function (input) {
        var output = "", chr1, chr2, chr3, enc1, enc2, enc3, enc4, i = 0;

        input = _utf8_encode(input);

        while (i < input.length) {

            chr1 = input.charCodeAt(i++);
            chr2 = input.charCodeAt(i++);
            chr3 = input.charCodeAt(i++);

            enc1 = chr1 >> 2;
            enc2 = ((chr1 & 3) << 4) | (chr2 >> 4);
            enc3 = ((chr2 & 15) << 2) | (chr3 >> 6);
            enc4 = chr3 & 63;

            if (isNaN(chr2)) {
                enc3 = enc4 = 64;
            } else if (isNaN(chr3)) {
                enc4 = 64;
            }

            output += _keyStr.charAt(enc1);
            output += _keyStr.charAt(enc2);
            output += _keyStr.charAt(enc3);
            output += _keyStr.charAt(enc4);
        }
        return output;
    };

    var decode = function (input) {
        var output = "", chr1, chr2, chr3, enc1, enc2, enc3, enc4, i = 0;

        input = input.replace(/[^A-Za-z0-9\+\/\=]/g, "");

        while (i < input.length) {

            enc1 = _keyStr.indexOf(input.charAt(i++));
            enc2 = _keyStr.indexOf(input.charAt(i++));
            enc3 = _keyStr.indexOf(input.charAt(i++));
            enc4 = _keyStr.indexOf(input.charAt(i++));

            chr1 = (enc1 << 2) | (enc2 >> 4);
            chr2 = ((enc2 & 15) << 4) | (enc3 >> 2);
            chr3 = ((enc3 & 3) << 6) | enc4;

            output += String.fromCharCode(chr1);

            if (enc3 !== 64) {
                output += String.fromCharCode(chr2);
            }
            if (enc4 !== 64) {
                output += String.fromCharCode(chr3);
            }

        }

        return _utf8_decode(output);
    };

    var decodeToHex = function(input) {
        return _hexEncode(decode(input));
    };

    var encodeFromHex = function(input) {
        return encode(_hexDecode(input));
    };

    return {
        'encode': encode,
        'decode': decode,
        'decodeToHex': decodeToHex,
        'encodeFromHex': encodeFromHex
    };
}());

2022年弃用警告更新

我在我的vscode上看到了弃用警告

This function is only provided for compatibility with legacy web platform APIs and should never be used in new code, 
because they use strings to represent binary data and predate the introduction of typed arrays in JavaScript. 
For code running using Node.js APIs, 
converting between base64-encoded strings and binary data should be performed using Buffer.from(str, 'base64') andbuf.toString('base64').

在搜索了一些之后，我发现这个问题说它没有被弃用

https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/issues/45566

所以解决web JS弃用警告的方法是使用window.btoa 警告就会消失。

如果你想简单快速地编码base 64，而不考虑可能的兼容性问题，你可以使用turbocommons库。只需下载压缩后的js文件并编写以下代码:

<script src="../yourpathtothelibrary/turbocommons-es5.js"></script>

<script>
    var ConversionUtils = org_turbocommons.ConversionUtils;

    ConversionUtils.stringToBase64('hello');
</script>

你可以在这里查看库是如何完成的代码:

https://github.com/edertone/TurboCommons/blob/master/TurboCommons-TS/src/main/ts/utils/ConversionUtils.ts

更多信息:

https://turboframework.org/en/blog/2022-10-26/encode-decode-base64-strings-javascript-typescript-php

你可以在这里在线测试:

https://turboframework.org/en/app/stringutils/base64-encode

这是一个atob()和btoa() JavaScript内置函数的现场演示:

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
  <head>
    <style>
      textarea{
        width:30%;
        height:100px;
      }
    </style>
    <script>
      // encode string to base64
      function encode()
      {
        var txt = document.getElementById("txt1").value;
        var result = btoa(txt);
        document.getElementById("txt2").value = result;
      }
      // decode base64 back to original string
      function decode()
      {
        var txt = document.getElementById("txt3").value;
        var result = atob(txt);
        document.getElementById("txt4").value = result;
      }
    </script>
  </head>
  <body>
    <div>
      <textarea id="txt1">Some text to decode
      </textarea>
    </div>
    <div>
      <input type="button" id="btnencode" value="Encode" onClick="encode()"/>
    </div>
    <div>
      <textarea id="txt2">
      </textarea>
    </div>
    <br/>
    <div>
      <textarea id="txt3">U29tZSB0ZXh0IHRvIGRlY29kZQ==
      </textarea>
    </div>
    <div>
      <input type="button" id="btndecode" value="Decode" onClick="decode()"/>
    </div>
    <div>
      <textarea id="txt4">
      </textarea>
    </div>
  </body>
</html>

我宁愿使用CryptoJS中的Base64编码/解码方法，这是使用最佳实践和模式在JavaScript中实现的最流行的标准和安全加密算法库。