在我的例子中，在app。module中。ts，我得到这个错误，因为我在imports和entryComponents中声明了组件。

Example:

import { MyComponent } from '....';

@NgModule({
  declarations: [
    MyComponent 
  ],
  imports: [
    MyComponent  -- > remove this from here!!!!
  ],
  providers: [],
  bootstrap: [AppComponent],
  entryComponents: [MyComponent]
})
export class AppModule { }

对于我这个TypeScript初学者来说，这是_var1的getter和setter的问题。

class Point2{
    
    constructor(private _var1?: number, private y?: number){}

    set var1(num: number){
        this._var1 = num  // problem was here, it was this.var1 = num
    }
    get var1(){
        return this._var1 // this was return this.var1
    }
}

发送输入元素而不是它们的值很可能会像FK提到的那样解决它

在你的代码中有一个递归循环(例如，一个函数最终会一次又一次地调用自己，直到堆栈满为止)。

其他浏览器要么有更大的堆栈(所以您会得到一个超时)，要么因为某种原因(可能是放置错误的try-catch)而忽略错误。

发生错误时，使用调试器检查调用堆栈。

在我的例子中，我发送的是输入元素而不是它们的值:

$.post( '',{ registerName: $('#registerName') } )

而不是:

$.post( '',{ registerName: $('#registerName').val() } )

这冻结了我的Chrome标签到一个点，它甚至没有显示我的“等待/杀死”对话框，当页面变得无响应…

这也会导致最大调用堆栈大小超过错误:

var items = [];
[].push.apply(items, new Array(1000000)); //Bad

我也一样:

items.push(...new Array(1000000)); //Bad

来自Mozilla文档:

But beware: in using apply this way, you run the risk of exceeding the JavaScript engine's argument length limit. The consequences of applying a function with too many arguments (think more than tens of thousands of arguments) vary across engines (JavaScriptCore has hard-coded argument limit of 65536), because the limit (indeed even the nature of any excessively-large-stack behavior) is unspecified. Some engines will throw an exception. More perniciously, others will arbitrarily limit the number of arguments actually passed to the applied function. To illustrate this latter case: if such an engine had a limit of four arguments (actual limits are of course significantly higher), it would be as if the arguments 5, 6, 2, 3 had been passed to apply in the examples above, rather than the full array.

所以尝试:

var items = [];
var newItems = new Array(1000000);
for(var i = 0; i < newItems.length; i++){
  items.push(newItems[i]);
}