Lambda清理了c# 2.0的匿名委托语法…例如

Strings.Find(s => s == "hello");

在c# 2.0中是这样完成的:

Strings.Find(delegate(String s) { return s == "hello"; });

在功能上，它们做的是完全相同的事情，只是语法更简洁。

这只是使用lambda表达式的一种方式。你可以在任何可以使用委托的地方使用lambda表达式。这允许你做这样的事情:

List<string> strings = new List<string>();
strings.Add("Good");
strings.Add("Morning")
strings.Add("Starshine");
strings.Add("The");
strings.Add("Earth");
strings.Add("says");
strings.Add("hello");

strings.Find(s => s == "hello");

这段代码将在列表中搜索与单词“hello”匹配的条目。另一种方法是传递一个委托给Find方法，像这样:

List<string> strings = new List<string>();
strings.Add("Good");
strings.Add("Morning")
strings.Add("Starshine");
strings.Add("The");
strings.Add("Earth");
strings.Add("says");
strings.Add("hello");

private static bool FindHello(String s)
{
    return s == "hello";
}

strings.Find(FindHello);

编辑:

在c# 2.0中，这可以使用匿名委托语法完成:

  strings.Find(delegate(String s) { return s == "hello"; });

Lambda明显地清理了语法。

Microsoft has given us a cleaner, more convenient way of creating anonymous delegates called Lambda expressions. However, there is not a lot of attention being paid to the expressions portion of this statement. Microsoft released a entire namespace, System.Linq.Expressions, which contains classes to create expression trees based on lambda expressions. Expression trees are made up of objects that represent logic. For example, x = y + z is an expression that might be part of an expression tree in .Net. Consider the following (simple) example:

using System;
using System.Linq;
using System.Linq.Expressions;


namespace ExpressionTreeThingy
{
    class Program
    {
        static void Main(string[] args)
        {
            Expression<Func<int, int>> expr = (x) => x + 1; //this is not a delegate, but an object
            var del = expr.Compile(); //compiles the object to a CLR delegate, at runtime
            Console.WriteLine(del(5)); //we are just invoking a delegate at this point
            Console.ReadKey();
        }
    }
}

This example is trivial. And I am sure you are thinking, "This is useless as I could have directly created the delegate instead of creating an expression and compiling it at runtime". And you would be right. But this provides the foundation for expression trees. There are a number of expressions available in the Expressions namespaces, and you can build your own. I think you can see that this might be useful when you don't know exactly what the algorithm should be at design or compile time. I saw an example somewhere for using this to write a scientific calculator. You could also use it for Bayesian systems, or for genetic programming (AI). A few times in my career I have had to write Excel-like functionality that allowed users to enter simple expressions (addition, subtrations, etc) to operate on available data. In pre-.Net 3.5 I have had to resort to some scripting language external to C#, or had to use the code-emitting functionality in reflection to create .Net code on the fly. Now I would use expression trees.

您还可以在编写作用于方法的泛型代码时使用lambda表达式。

例如:计算方法调用所花费的时间的泛型函数。(即这里的动作)

public static long Measure(Action action)
{
    Stopwatch sw = new Stopwatch();
    sw.Start();
    action();
    sw.Stop();
    return sw.ElapsedMilliseconds;
}

你可以使用lambda表达式调用上述方法，如下所示，

var timeTaken = Measure(() => yourMethod(param));

表达式允许您从方法和out参数中获取返回值

var timeTaken = Measure(() => returnValue = yourMethod(param, out outParam));

例如，Lambda表达式使任务简单得多

var numbers = new List<int> { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 };

var oddNumbers = numbers.Where(x => x % 2 != 0);
var sumOfEven = numbers.Where(x => x % 2 == 0).Sum();

在上面的代码中，因为我们使用了lambda，所以我们在一行代码中得到奇数和偶数的和。

如果没有lambda，我们将不得不使用if/else或for循环。

因此，使用lambda来简化c#中的代码是很好的。

一些关于它的文章:

https://qawithexperts.com/article/c-sharp/lambda-expression-in-c-with-examples/470

https://exceptionnotfound.net/csharp-in-simple-terms-18-expressions-lambdas-and-delegates

http://dontcodetired.com/blog/post/Whats-New-in-C-10-Easier-Lambda-Expressions

很多时候，您只在一个地方使用功能，所以创建方法只会使类变得混乱。