我遇到了绑定到密码盒的问题。这似乎是一个安全风险，但我正在使用MVVM模式，所以我希望绕过这个。我在这里发现了一些有趣的代码(有人使用过这个或类似的代码吗?)
http://www.wpftutorial.net/PasswordBox.html
从技术上讲，它看起来很棒，但我不确定如何检索密码。
我基本上有属性在我的LoginViewModel用户名和密码。用户名是好的，正在工作，因为它是一个文本框。
我使用上面的代码，并输入这个
<PasswordBox ff:PasswordHelper.Attach="True"
ff:PasswordHelper.Password="{Binding Path=Password}" Width="130"/>
当我有PasswordBox作为一个文本框和绑定路径=密码，然后在我的LoginViewModel属性更新。
我的代码非常简单，基本上我有一个命令为我的按钮。当我按下它CanLogin被调用，如果它返回真，它调用Login。
你可以看到，我检查了我的用户名属性，这很好。
在登录我发送到我的服务的用户名和密码，用户名包含数据从我的视图，但密码是空|空
private DelegateCommand loginCommand;
public string Username { get; set; }
public string Password { get; set; }
public ICommand LoginCommand
{
get
{
if (loginCommand == null)
{
loginCommand = new DelegateCommand(
Login, CanLogin );
}
return loginCommand;
}
}
private bool CanLogin()
{
return !string.IsNullOrEmpty(Username);
}
private void Login()
{
bool result = securityService.IsValidLogin(Username, Password);
if (result) { }
else { }
}
这就是我正在做的
<TextBox Text="{Binding Path=Username, UpdateSourceTrigger=PropertyChanged}"
MinWidth="180" />
<PasswordBox ff:PasswordHelper.Attach="True"
ff:PasswordHelper.Password="{Binding Path=Password}" Width="130"/>
我有我的文本框，这是没有问题的，但在我的ViewModel密码是空的。
是我做错了什么还是漏了一步?
我放了一个断点，果然代码进入静态助手类，但它从不更新我的ViewModel中的密码。
好吧，我的答案更简单，只是在MVVM模式
在类视图模型中
public string password;
PasswordChangedCommand = new DelegateCommand<RoutedEventArgs>(PasswordChanged);
Private void PasswordChanged(RoutedEventArgs obj)
{
var e = (WatermarkPasswordBox)obj.OriginalSource;
//or depending or what are you using
var e = (PasswordBox)obj.OriginalSource;
password =e.Password;
}
win提供的PasswordBox或XCeedtoolkit提供的WatermarkPasswordBox的password属性生成一个RoutedEventArgs，以便您可以绑定它。
现在在xmal视图中
<Xceed:WatermarkPasswordBox Watermark="Input your Password" Grid.Column="1" Grid.ColumnSpan="3" Grid.Row="7" PasswordChar="*" >
<i:Interaction.Triggers>
<i:EventTrigger EventName="PasswordChanged">
<prism:InvokeCommandAction Command="{Binding RelativeSource={RelativeSource AncestorType=UserControl}, Path= DataContext.PasswordChangedCommand}" CommandParameter="{Binding RelativeSource={RelativeSource Self}, Path= Password}"/>
</i:EventTrigger>
</i:Interaction.Triggers>
</Xceed:WatermarkPasswordBox>
or
<PasswordBox Grid.Column="1" Grid.ColumnSpan="3" Grid.Row="7" PasswordChar="*" >
<i:Interaction.Triggers>
<i:EventTrigger EventName="PasswordChanged">
<prism:InvokeCommandAction Command="{Binding RelativeSource={RelativeSource AncestorType=UserControl}, Path= DataContext.PasswordChangedCommand}" CommandParameter="{Binding RelativeSource={RelativeSource Self}, Path= Password}"/>
</i:EventTrigger>
</i:Interaction.Triggers>
</PasswordBox>
也许我遗漏了一些东西，但似乎大多数解决方案都把事情复杂化了，并且忽略了安全实践。
此方法不违反MVVM模式，并保持完全的安全性。是的，从技术上讲，它是后面的代码，但它只不过是一个“特殊情况”绑定。ViewModel仍然没有视图实现的知识，在我看来，如果你试图将PasswordBox传递到ViewModel，它就会知道。
Code Behind !=自动违反MVVM。这完全取决于你怎么处理它。在这种情况下，我们只是手动编码绑定，所以它都被认为是UI实现的一部分，因此是ok的。
在ViewModel中，只是一个简单的属性。我把它设置为“只写”，因为无论出于什么原因，都不需要从ViewModel外部检索它，但它并不一定要这样。注意，它是一个SecureString，而不仅仅是一个字符串。
public SecureString SecurePassword { private get; set; }
在xaml中，您设置了PasswordChanged事件处理程序。
<PasswordBox PasswordChanged="PasswordBox_PasswordChanged"/>
在后面的代码中:
private void PasswordBox_PasswordChanged(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
if (this.DataContext != null)
{ ((dynamic)this.DataContext).SecurePassword = ((PasswordBox)sender).SecurePassword; }
}
使用这种方法，您的密码始终保持在SecureString中，因此提供了最大的安全性。如果你真的不关心安全性，或者你需要为需要它的下游方法提供明文密码(注意:大多数需要密码的。net方法也支持SecureString选项，所以你可能真的不需要明文密码，即使你认为你需要)，你可以只使用password属性。是这样的:
(ViewModel财产)
public string Password { private get; set; }
(代码后面)
private void PasswordBox_PasswordChanged(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
if (this.DataContext != null)
{ ((dynamic)this.DataContext).Password = ((PasswordBox)sender).Password; }
}
如果你想保持事物的强类型，你可以用ViewModel的接口代替(动态的)强制转换。但实际上，“正常的”数据绑定也不是强类型的，所以这不是什么大问题。
private void PasswordBox_PasswordChanged(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
if (this.DataContext != null)
{ ((IMyViewModel)this.DataContext).Password = ((PasswordBox)sender).Password; }
}
所以最好的是-你的密码是安全的，你的ViewModel就像任何其他属性一样有一个属性，你的View是自包含的，不需要外部引用。
我花了大量时间研究各种解决方案。我不喜欢装饰器的想法，行为弄乱了验证UI，背后的代码……真的吗?
最好的方法是坚持自定义附加属性，并绑定到视图模型中的SecureString属性。尽量把它放在里面。当你需要快速访问纯密码时，使用下面的代码将其临时转换为不安全的字符串:
namespace Namespace.Extensions
{
using System;
using System.Runtime.InteropServices;
using System.Security;
/// <summary>
/// Provides unsafe temporary operations on secured strings.
/// </summary>
[SuppressUnmanagedCodeSecurity]
public static class SecureStringExtensions
{
/// <summary>
/// Converts a secured string to an unsecured string.
/// </summary>
public static string ToUnsecuredString(this SecureString secureString)
{
// copy&paste from the internal System.Net.UnsafeNclNativeMethods
IntPtr bstrPtr = IntPtr.Zero;
if (secureString != null)
{
if (secureString.Length != 0)
{
try
{
bstrPtr = Marshal.SecureStringToBSTR(secureString);
return Marshal.PtrToStringBSTR(bstrPtr);
}
finally
{
if (bstrPtr != IntPtr.Zero)
Marshal.ZeroFreeBSTR(bstrPtr);
}
}
}
return string.Empty;
}
/// <summary>
/// Copies the existing instance of a secure string into the destination, clearing the destination beforehand.
/// </summary>
public static void CopyInto(this SecureString source, SecureString destination)
{
destination.Clear();
foreach (var chr in source.ToUnsecuredString())
{
destination.AppendChar(chr);
}
}
/// <summary>
/// Converts an unsecured string to a secured string.
/// </summary>
public static SecureString ToSecuredString(this string plainString)
{
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(plainString))
{
return new SecureString();
}
SecureString secure = new SecureString();
foreach (char c in plainString)
{
secure.AppendChar(c);
}
return secure;
}
}
}
确保允许GC收集UI元素，因此不要为PasswordBox上的PasswordChanged事件使用静态事件处理程序。
我还发现了一个异常，当使用SecurePassword属性设置它时，控件没有更新UI，这就是为什么我将密码复制到password的原因。
namespace Namespace.Controls
{
using System.Security;
using System.Windows;
using System.Windows.Controls;
using Namespace.Extensions;
/// <summary>
/// Creates a bindable attached property for the <see cref="PasswordBox.SecurePassword"/> property.
/// </summary>
public static class PasswordBoxHelper
{
// an attached behavior won't work due to view model validation not picking up the right control to adorn
public static readonly DependencyProperty SecurePasswordBindingProperty = DependencyProperty.RegisterAttached(
"SecurePassword",
typeof(SecureString),
typeof(PasswordBoxHelper),
new FrameworkPropertyMetadata(new SecureString(),FrameworkPropertyMetadataOptions.BindsTwoWayByDefault, AttachedPropertyValueChanged)
);
private static readonly DependencyProperty _passwordBindingMarshallerProperty = DependencyProperty.RegisterAttached(
"PasswordBindingMarshaller",
typeof(PasswordBindingMarshaller),
typeof(PasswordBoxHelper),
new PropertyMetadata()
);
public static void SetSecurePassword(PasswordBox element, SecureString secureString)
{
element.SetValue(SecurePasswordBindingProperty, secureString);
}
public static SecureString GetSecurePassword(PasswordBox element)
{
return element.GetValue(SecurePasswordBindingProperty) as SecureString;
}
private static void AttachedPropertyValueChanged(DependencyObject d, DependencyPropertyChangedEventArgs e)
{
// we'll need to hook up to one of the element's events
// in order to allow the GC to collect the control, we'll wrap the event handler inside an object living in an attached property
// don't be tempted to use the Unloaded event as that will be fired even when the control is still alive and well (e.g. switching tabs in a tab control)
var passwordBox = (PasswordBox)d;
var bindingMarshaller = passwordBox.GetValue(_passwordBindingMarshallerProperty) as PasswordBindingMarshaller;
if (bindingMarshaller == null)
{
bindingMarshaller = new PasswordBindingMarshaller(passwordBox);
passwordBox.SetValue(_passwordBindingMarshallerProperty, bindingMarshaller);
}
bindingMarshaller.UpdatePasswordBox(e.NewValue as SecureString);
}
/// <summary>
/// Encapsulated event logic
/// </summary>
private class PasswordBindingMarshaller
{
private readonly PasswordBox _passwordBox;
private bool _isMarshalling;
public PasswordBindingMarshaller(PasswordBox passwordBox)
{
_passwordBox = passwordBox;
_passwordBox.PasswordChanged += this.PasswordBoxPasswordChanged;
}
public void UpdatePasswordBox(SecureString newPassword)
{
if (_isMarshalling)
{
return;
}
_isMarshalling = true;
try
{
// setting up the SecuredPassword won't trigger a visual update so we'll have to use the Password property
_passwordBox.Password = newPassword.ToUnsecuredString();
// you may try the statement below, however the benefits are minimal security wise (you still have to extract the unsecured password for copying)
//newPassword.CopyInto(_passwordBox.SecurePassword);
}
finally
{
_isMarshalling = false;
}
}
private void PasswordBoxPasswordChanged(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
// copy the password into the attached property
if (_isMarshalling)
{
return;
}
_isMarshalling = true;
try
{
SetSecurePassword(_passwordBox, _passwordBox.SecurePassword.Copy());
}
finally
{
_isMarshalling = false;
}
}
}
}
}
以及XAML用法:
<PasswordBox controls:PasswordBoxHelper.SecurePassword="{Binding LogonPassword, UpdateSourceTrigger=PropertyChanged, ValidatesOnDataErrors=True}">
我在视图模型中的属性是这样的:
[RequiredSecureString]
public SecureString LogonPassword
{
get
{
return _logonPassword;
}
set
{
_logonPassword = value;
NotifyPropertyChanged(nameof(LogonPassword));
}
}
RequiredSecureString只是一个简单的自定义验证器，它有以下逻辑:
[AttributeUsage(AttributeTargets.Property | AttributeTargets.Field, AllowMultiple = true)]
public class RequiredSecureStringAttribute:ValidationAttribute
{
public RequiredSecureStringAttribute()
:base("Field is required")
{
}
public override bool IsValid(object value)
{
return (value as SecureString)?.Length > 0;
}
}
给你。一个完整的和经过测试的纯MVVM解决方案。
