“filter”和“indexOf”在IE中的Array上不支持。这个怎么样:

var array1 = [1, 2, 3];
var array2 = [2, 3, 4, 5];

var intersection = [];
for (i in array1) {
    for (j in array2) {
        if (array1[i] == array2[j]) intersection.push(array1[i]);
    }
}

这是我使用的一个非常简单的实现。它是无损的，也确保不复制整个。

Array.prototype.contains = function(elem) {
    return(this.indexOf(elem) > -1);
};

Array.prototype.intersect = function( array ) {
    // this is naive--could use some optimization
    var result = [];
    for ( var i = 0; i < this.length; i++ ) {
        if ( array.contains(this[i]) && !result.contains(this[i]) )
            result.push( this[i] );
    }
    return result;
}

简单性:

// Usage
const intersection = allLists
  .reduce(intersect, allValues)
  .reduce(removeDuplicates, []);


// Implementation
const intersect = (intersection, list) =>
  intersection.filter(item =>
    list.some(x => x === item));

const removeDuplicates = (uniques, item) =>
  uniques.includes(item) ? uniques : uniques.concat(item);


// Example Data
const somePeople = [bob, doug, jill];
const otherPeople = [sarah, bob, jill];
const morePeople = [jack, jill];

const allPeople = [...somePeople, ...otherPeople, ...morePeople];
const allGroups = [somePeople, otherPeople, morePeople];

// Example Usage
const intersection = allGroups
  .reduce(intersect, allPeople)
  .reduce(removeDuplicates, []);

intersection; // [jill]

好处:

泥土简单 以数据为中心的 适用于任意数量的列表 适用于任意长度的列表 适用于任意类型的值 适用于任意排序顺序 保留形状(在任何数组中首次出现的顺序) 尽可能早退出 内存安全，不影响函数/数组原型

缺点:

内存占用率较高 更高的CPU使用率 需要理解reduce 需要理解数据流

你不希望将其用于3D引擎或内核工作，但如果你在基于事件的应用程序中运行时遇到问题，那么你的设计就有更大的问题。

如果你需要让它处理交叉多个数组:

Const intersect = (a1, a2，…rest) => { Const a12 = a1。过滤器(value => a2.includes(value)) 如果休息。长度=== 0){返回a12;｝ 回归相交(a12，…rest); }; console.log(相交([1、2、3、4、5],[1,2],[1、2、3、4、5],[2 10 1]))

下面是一个使用可选的比较函数处理多个数组的简单实现:

函数交叉(数组，compareFn = (val1, val2) => (val1 == val2)) { 如果数组。长度< 2)返回数组[0]?［］ Const array1 = arrays[0] const array2 =交集(arrays.slice(1)， compareFn) array1返回。过滤器(val1 =>数组2。if (val2 => compareFn(val1, val2))) ｝ console.log(十字路口([[1,2,3],[2、3、4、5]])) console.log(十字路口([[{id: 1}, {id: 2}], [{id: 1}, {id: 3}]], (val1, val2) => val1。Id === val2.id)

//在线性时间内返回数组a中也在b中的元素: 函数相交(a, b) { 返回a.filter (Set.prototype。new Set(b)); ｝ / /例如: console.log(相交([1,2,3],[2、3、4、5]));

我推荐上述简洁的解决方案，它在大输入上优于其他实现。如果在小输入上的性能很重要，请检查下面的替代方案。

备选方案和性能比较:

有关替代实现，请参阅下面的代码片段，并检查https://jsperf.com/array-intersection-comparison以进行性能比较。

function intersect_for(a, b) { const result = []; const alen = a.length; const blen = b.length; for (let i = 0; i < alen; ++i) { const ai = a[i]; for (let j = 0; j < blen; ++j) { if (ai === b[j]) { result.push(ai); break; } } } return result; } function intersect_filter_indexOf(a, b) { return a.filter(el => b.indexOf(el) !== -1); } function intersect_filter_in(a, b) { const map = b.reduce((map, el) => {map[el] = true; return map}, {}); return a.filter(el => el in map); } function intersect_for_in(a, b) { const result = []; const map = {}; for (let i = 0, length = b.length; i < length; ++i) { map[b[i]] = true; } for (let i = 0, length = a.length; i < length; ++i) { if (a[i] in map) result.push(a[i]); } return result; } function intersect_filter_includes(a, b) { return a.filter(el => b.includes(el)); } function intersect_filter_has_this(a, b) { return a.filter(Set.prototype.has, new Set(b)); } function intersect_filter_has_arrow(a, b) { const set = new Set(b); return a.filter(el => set.has(el)); } function intersect_for_has(a, b) { const result = []; const set = new Set(b); for (let i = 0, length = a.length; i < length; ++i) { if (set.has(a[i])) result.push(a[i]); } return result; }

Firefox 53的结果:

Ops/sec on large arrays (10,000 elements): filter + has (this) 523 (this answer) for + has 482 for-loop + in 279 filter + in 242 for-loops 24 filter + includes 14 filter + indexOf 10 Ops/sec on small arrays (100 elements): for-loop + in 384,426 filter + in 192,066 for-loops 159,137 filter + includes 104,068 filter + indexOf 71,598 filter + has (this) 43,531 (this answer) filter + has (arrow function) 35,588