关于使用fs.readdir进行异步目录搜索有什么想法吗?我意识到我们可以引入递归,并调用read目录函数来读取下一个目录,但我有点担心它不是异步的…
什么好主意吗?我已经看了node-walk,它很棒,但它不能像readdir那样只给我数组中的文件。虽然
寻找这样的输出…
['file1.txt', 'file2.txt', 'dir/file3.txt']
关于使用fs.readdir进行异步目录搜索有什么想法吗?我意识到我们可以引入递归,并调用read目录函数来读取下一个目录,但我有点担心它不是异步的…
什么好主意吗?我已经看了node-walk,它很棒,但它不能像readdir那样只给我数组中的文件。虽然
寻找这样的输出…
['file1.txt', 'file2.txt', 'dir/file3.txt']
当前回答
只是简单的散步
let pending = [baseFolderPath]
function walk () {
pending.shift();
// do stuffs width pending[0] and change pending items
if (pending[0]) walk(pending[0])
}
walk(pending[0])
其他回答
在这种情况下,Klaw和Klaw -sync值得考虑。这些是node-fs-extra的一部分。
这是我如何使用nodejs的fs。递归搜索目录的Readdir函数。
const fs = require('fs');
const mime = require('mime-types');
const readdirRecursivePromise = path => {
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
fs.readdir(path, (err, directoriesPaths) => {
if (err) {
reject(err);
} else {
if (directoriesPaths.indexOf('.DS_Store') != -1) {
directoriesPaths.splice(directoriesPaths.indexOf('.DS_Store'), 1);
}
directoriesPaths.forEach((e, i) => {
directoriesPaths[i] = statPromise(`${path}/${e}`);
});
Promise.all(directoriesPaths).then(out => {
resolve(out);
}).catch(err => {
reject(err);
});
}
});
});
};
const statPromise = path => {
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
fs.stat(path, (err, stats) => {
if (err) {
reject(err);
} else {
if (stats.isDirectory()) {
readdirRecursivePromise(path).then(out => {
resolve(out);
}).catch(err => {
reject(err);
});
} else if (stats.isFile()) {
resolve({
'path': path,
'type': mime.lookup(path)
});
} else {
reject(`Error parsing path: ${path}`);
}
}
});
});
};
const flatten = (arr, result = []) => {
for (let i = 0, length = arr.length; i < length; i++) {
const value = arr[i];
if (Array.isArray(value)) {
flatten(value, result);
} else {
result.push(value);
}
}
return result;
};
假设在节点项目根目录中有一个名为“/database”的路径。一旦这个承诺被解决,它应该吐出'/database'下的每个文件的数组。
readdirRecursivePromise('database').then(out => {
console.log(flatten(out));
}).catch(err => {
console.log(err);
});
因为每个人都应该写自己的,所以我写了一个。
步行(dir, cb, endCb) cb(文件) 零endCb (err |)
脏
module.exports = walk;
function walk(dir, cb, endCb) {
var fs = require('fs');
var path = require('path');
fs.readdir(dir, function(err, files) {
if (err) {
return endCb(err);
}
var pending = files.length;
if (pending === 0) {
endCb(null);
}
files.forEach(function(file) {
fs.stat(path.join(dir, file), function(err, stats) {
if (err) {
return endCb(err)
}
if (stats.isDirectory()) {
walk(path.join(dir, file), cb, function() {
pending--;
if (pending === 0) {
endCb(null);
}
});
} else {
cb(path.join(dir, file));
pending--;
if (pending === 0) {
endCb(null);
}
}
})
});
});
}
我修改了老特雷弗的承诺为蓝鸟工作的基础上的答案
var fs = require('fs'),
path = require('path'),
Promise = require('bluebird');
var readdirAsync = Promise.promisify(fs.readdir);
var statAsync = Promise.promisify(fs.stat);
function walkFiles (directory) {
var results = [];
return readdirAsync(directory).map(function(file) {
file = path.join(directory, file);
return statAsync(file).then(function(stat) {
if (stat.isFile()) {
return results.push(file);
}
return walkFiles(file).then(function(filesInDir) {
results = results.concat(filesInDir);
});
});
}).then(function() {
return results;
});
}
//use
walkDir(__dirname).then(function(files) {
console.log(files);
}).catch(function(e) {
console.error(e); {
});
There are basically two ways of accomplishing this. In an async environment you'll notice that there are two kinds of loops: serial and parallel. A serial loop waits for one iteration to complete before it moves onto the next iteration - this guarantees that every iteration of the loop completes in order. In a parallel loop, all the iterations are started at the same time, and one may complete before another, however, it is much faster than a serial loop. So in this case, it's probably better to use a parallel loop because it doesn't matter what order the walk completes in, just as long as it completes and returns the results (unless you want them in order).
一个平行循环看起来是这样的:
var fs = require('fs');
var path = require('path');
var walk = function(dir, done) {
var results = [];
fs.readdir(dir, function(err, list) {
if (err) return done(err);
var pending = list.length;
if (!pending) return done(null, results);
list.forEach(function(file) {
file = path.resolve(dir, file);
fs.stat(file, function(err, stat) {
if (stat && stat.isDirectory()) {
walk(file, function(err, res) {
results = results.concat(res);
if (!--pending) done(null, results);
});
} else {
results.push(file);
if (!--pending) done(null, results);
}
});
});
});
};
一个串行循环看起来像这样:
var fs = require('fs');
var path = require('path');
var walk = function(dir, done) {
var results = [];
fs.readdir(dir, function(err, list) {
if (err) return done(err);
var i = 0;
(function next() {
var file = list[i++];
if (!file) return done(null, results);
file = path.resolve(dir, file);
fs.stat(file, function(err, stat) {
if (stat && stat.isDirectory()) {
walk(file, function(err, res) {
results = results.concat(res);
next();
});
} else {
results.push(file);
next();
}
});
})();
});
};
并且在你的主目录中测试它(警告:如果你的主目录中有很多东西,结果列表将会非常大):
walk(process.env.HOME, function(err, results) {
if (err) throw err;
console.log(results);
});
编辑:改进的示例。