杰森·邦廷的最后一个指数不成立。我的方法不是最优的，但有效。

//Jason Bunting's
String.prototype.regexIndexOf = function(regex, startpos) {
var indexOf = this.substring(startpos || 0).search(regex);
return (indexOf >= 0) ? (indexOf + (startpos || 0)) : indexOf;
}

String.prototype.regexLastIndexOf = function(regex, startpos) {
var lastIndex = -1;
var index = this.regexIndexOf( regex );
startpos = startpos === undefined ? this.length : startpos;

while ( index >= 0 && index < startpos )
{
    lastIndex = index;
    index = this.regexIndexOf( regex, index + 1 );
}
return lastIndex;
}

你可以使用String.prototype.matchAll()和方便的Array.prototype.at():

const str = "foo a foo B"; const matches =[…str.matchAll(/[abc]/gi)]; If (matches.length) { const indexOfFirstMatch = matches.at(0).index; const indexOfLastMatch = matches.at(-1).index; console.log (indexOfFirstMatch indexOfLastMatch) ｝

如果您正在使用RegExp寻找一个非常简单的lastIndex查找，并且不关心它是否完全模仿了lastIndexOf，那么这可能会引起您的注意。

我只是将字符串反向，并从length - 1中减去第一个出现索引。它碰巧通过了我的测试，但我认为长字符串可能会出现性能问题。

interface String {
  reverse(): string;
  lastIndex(regex: RegExp): number;
}

String.prototype.reverse = function(this: string) {
  return this.split("")
    .reverse()
    .join("");
};

String.prototype.lastIndex = function(this: string, regex: RegExp) {
  const exec = regex.exec(this.reverse());
  return exec === null ? -1 : this.length - 1 - exec.index;
};

我使用string .prototype.match(regex)，它返回一个字符串数组，所有找到的匹配给定的正则表达式在字符串(更多信息见这里):

function getLastIndex(text, regex, limit = text.length) { const matches = text.match(regex); // no matches found if (!matches) { return -1; } // matches found but first index greater than limit if (text.indexOf(matches[0] + matches[0].length) > limit) { return -1; } // reduce index until smaller than limit let i = matches.length - 1; let index = text.lastIndexOf(matches[i]); while (index > limit && i >= 0) { i--; index = text.lastIndexOf(matches[i]); } return index > limit ? -1 : index; } // expect -1 as first index === 14 console.log(getLastIndex('First Sentence. Last Sentence. Unfinished', /\. /g, 10)); // expect 29 console.log(getLastIndex('First Sentence. Last Sentence. Unfinished', /\. /g));

对于具有稀疏匹配的数据，使用字符串。跨浏览器搜索速度最快。它每次迭代都会重新切片字符串:

function lastIndexOfSearch(string, regex, index) {
  if(index === 0 || index)
     string = string.slice(0, Math.max(0,index));
  var idx;
  var offset = -1;
  while ((idx = string.search(regex)) !== -1) {
    offset += idx + 1;
    string = string.slice(idx + 1);
  }
  return offset;
}

对于密集的数据，我做了这个。与执行方法相比，它比较复杂，但对于密集数据，它比我尝试过的其他方法快2-10倍，比公认的解决方案快100倍左右。要点如下:

It calls exec on the regex passed in once to verify there is a match or quit early. I do this using (?= in a similar method, but on IE checking with exec is dramatically faster. It constructs and caches a modified regex in the format '(r).(?!.?r)' The new regex is executed and the results from either that exec, or the first exec, are returned; function lastIndexOfGroupSimple(string, regex, index) { if (index === 0 || index) string = string.slice(0, Math.max(0, index + 1)); regex.lastIndex = 0; var lastRegex, index flags = 'g' + (regex.multiline ? 'm' : '') + (regex.ignoreCase ? 'i' : ''), key = regex.source + '$' + flags, match = regex.exec(string); if (!match) return -1; if (lastIndexOfGroupSimple.cache === undefined) lastIndexOfGroupSimple.cache = {}; lastRegex = lastIndexOfGroupSimple.cache[key]; if (!lastRegex) lastIndexOfGroupSimple.cache[key] = lastRegex = new RegExp('.*(' + regex.source + ')(?!.*?' + regex.source + ')', flags); index = match.index; lastRegex.lastIndex = match.index; return (match = lastRegex.exec(string)) ? lastRegex.lastIndex - match[1].length : index; };

方法的jsPerf

我不明白上面这些测试的目的。需要正则表达式的情况是不可能与调用indexOf进行比较的，我认为这是首先创建该方法的目的。为了让测试通过，使用'xxx+(?!x)'比调整regex迭代的方式更有意义。

根据BaileyP的回答。主要的区别是，如果模式不能匹配，这些方法将返回-1。

编辑:感谢Jason Bunting的回答，我有了一个想法。为什么不修改正则表达式的.lastIndex属性?尽管这只适用于带有全局标志(/g)的模式。

编辑:更新以通过测试用例。

String.prototype.regexIndexOf = function(re, startPos) {
    startPos = startPos || 0;

    if (!re.global) {
        var flags = "g" + (re.multiline?"m":"") + (re.ignoreCase?"i":"");
        re = new RegExp(re.source, flags);
    }

    re.lastIndex = startPos;
    var match = re.exec(this);

    if (match) return match.index;
    else return -1;
}

String.prototype.regexLastIndexOf = function(re, startPos) {
    startPos = startPos === undefined ? this.length : startPos;

    if (!re.global) {
        var flags = "g" + (re.multiline?"m":"") + (re.ignoreCase?"i":"");
        re = new RegExp(re.source, flags);
    }

    var lastSuccess = -1;
    for (var pos = 0; pos <= startPos; pos++) {
        re.lastIndex = pos;

        var match = re.exec(this);
        if (!match) break;

        pos = match.index;
        if (pos <= startPos) lastSuccess = pos;
    }

    return lastSuccess;
}