我试图在Java中反转一个int数组。
此方法不反转数组。
for(int i = 0; i < validData.length; i++)
{
int temp = validData[i];
validData[i] = validData[validData.length - i - 1];
validData[validData.length - i - 1] = temp;
}
有什么问题吗?
我试图在Java中反转一个int数组。
此方法不反转数组。
for(int i = 0; i < validData.length; i++)
{
int temp = validData[i];
validData[i] = validData[validData.length - i - 1];
validData[validData.length - i - 1] = temp;
}
有什么问题吗?
当前回答
这是我个人的解决方法。创建参数化方法的原因是允许对任何数组进行排序…不仅仅是整数。
我希望你能从中有所收获。
@Test
public void reverseTest(){
Integer[] ints = { 1, 2, 3, 4 };
Integer[] reversedInts = reverse(ints);
assert ints[0].equals(reversedInts[3]);
assert ints[1].equals(reversedInts[2]);
assert ints[2].equals(reversedInts[1]);
assert ints[3].equals(reversedInts[0]);
reverseInPlace(reversedInts);
assert ints[0].equals(reversedInts[0]);
}
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
private static <T> T[] reverse(T[] array) {
if (array == null) {
return (T[]) new ArrayList<T>().toArray();
}
List<T> copyOfArray = Arrays.asList(Arrays.copyOf(array, array.length));
Collections.reverse(copyOfArray);
return copyOfArray.toArray(array);
}
private static <T> T[] reverseInPlace(T[] array) {
if(array == null) {
// didn't want two unchecked suppressions
return reverse(array);
}
Collections.reverse(Arrays.asList(array));
return array;
}
其他回答
一种无需额外库、导入或静态引用即可进行反向操作的简便方法。
int[] a = {1,2,3,4,5,6,7,23,9}, b; //compound declaration
var j = a.length;
b = new int[j];
for (var i : a)
b[--j] = i; //--j so you don't have to subtract 1 from j. Otherwise you would get ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException;
System.out.println(Arrays.toString(b));
当然,如果你需要a是反向数组就用
a = b; //after the loop
您的程序只适用于length = 0,1。 你可以试试:
int i = 0, j = validData.length-1 ;
while(i < j)
{
swap(validData, i++, j--); // code for swap not shown, but easy enough
}
我认为如果你声明显式变量来跟踪你在每次循环迭代中交换的下标,那么遵循算法的逻辑会更容易一些。
public static void reverse(int[] data) {
for (int left = 0, right = data.length - 1; left < right; left++, right--) {
// swap the values at the left and right indices
int temp = data[left];
data[left] = data[right];
data[right] = temp;
}
}
我还认为在while循环中执行这个操作更具可读性。
public static void reverse(int[] data) {
int left = 0;
int right = data.length - 1;
while( left < right ) {
// swap the values at the left and right indices
int temp = data[left];
data[left] = data[right];
data[right] = temp;
// move the left and right index pointers in toward the center
left++;
right--;
}
}
试试这个程序在JAVA:-
import java.util.Scanner;
public class Rev_one_D {
static int row;
static int[] trans_arr = new int[row];
public static void main(String[] args) {
Scanner sc = new Scanner(System.in);
int n = sc.nextInt();
row = n;
int[] arr = new int[row];
for (int i = 0; i < row; i++) {
arr[i] = sc.nextInt();
System.out.print(arr[i] + " ");
System.out.println();
}
for (int i = 0; i < arr.length / 2; i++) {
int temp = arr[i];
arr[i] = arr[arr.length - i - 1];
arr[arr.length - i - 1] = temp;
}
for (int i = 0; i < row; i++) {
System.out.print(arr[i] + " ");
System.out.println();
}
}
}
这是我个人的解决方法。创建参数化方法的原因是允许对任何数组进行排序…不仅仅是整数。
我希望你能从中有所收获。
@Test
public void reverseTest(){
Integer[] ints = { 1, 2, 3, 4 };
Integer[] reversedInts = reverse(ints);
assert ints[0].equals(reversedInts[3]);
assert ints[1].equals(reversedInts[2]);
assert ints[2].equals(reversedInts[1]);
assert ints[3].equals(reversedInts[0]);
reverseInPlace(reversedInts);
assert ints[0].equals(reversedInts[0]);
}
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
private static <T> T[] reverse(T[] array) {
if (array == null) {
return (T[]) new ArrayList<T>().toArray();
}
List<T> copyOfArray = Arrays.asList(Arrays.copyOf(array, array.length));
Collections.reverse(copyOfArray);
return copyOfArray.toArray(array);
}
private static <T> T[] reverseInPlace(T[] array) {
if(array == null) {
// didn't want two unchecked suppressions
return reverse(array);
}
Collections.reverse(Arrays.asList(array));
return array;
}