我用这个

@"^([\w\.\-]+)@([\w\-]+)((\.(\w){2,3})+)$"

Regexp来验证电子邮件

([\w\.\-]+) -用于第一级域名(许多字母和数字,也有点和连字符) ([\w\-]+) -用于二级域 ((\.(\w){2,3})+) -这是用于其他级别域(从3到无穷),其中包括一个点和2或3个字面量

这个正则表达式有什么问题?

编辑:它与“something@someth.ing”电子邮件不匹配


当前回答

这并不满足rfc 5321和5322的所有要求,但它适用于以下定义。

@"^([0-9a-zA-Z]([\+\-_\.][0-9a-zA-Z]+)*)+"@(([0-9a-zA-Z][-\w]*[0-9a-zA-Z]*\.)+[a-zA-Z0-9]{2,17})$";

下面是代码

const String pattern =
   @"^([0-9a-zA-Z]" + //Start with a digit or alphabetical
   @"([\+\-_\.][0-9a-zA-Z]+)*" + // No continuous or ending +-_. chars in email
   @")+" +
   @"@(([0-9a-zA-Z][-\w]*[0-9a-zA-Z]*\.)+[a-zA-Z0-9]{2,17})$";

var validEmails = new[] {
        "ma@hostname.com",
        "ma@hostname.comcom",
        "MA@hostname.coMCom",
        "m.a@hostname.co",
        "m_a1a@hostname.com",
        "ma-a@hostname.com",
        "ma-a@hostname.com.edu",
        "ma-a.aa@hostname.com.edu",
        "ma.h.saraf.onemore@hostname.com.edu",
        "ma12@hostname.com",
        "12@hostname.com",
};
var invalidEmails = new[] {
        "Abc.example.com",     // No `@`
        "A@b@c@example.com",   // multiple `@`
        "ma...ma@jjf.co",      // continuous multiple dots in name
        "ma@jjf.c",            // only 1 char in extension
        "ma@jjf..com",         // continuous multiple dots in domain
        "ma@@jjf.com",         // continuous multiple `@`
        "@majjf.com",          // nothing before `@`
        "ma.@jjf.com",         // nothing after `.`
        "ma_@jjf.com",         // nothing after `_`
        "ma_@jjf",             // no domain extension 
        "ma_@jjf.",            // nothing after `_` and .
        "ma@jjf.",             // nothing after `.`
    };

foreach (var str in validEmails)
{
    Console.WriteLine("{0} - {1} ", str, Regex.IsMatch(str, pattern));
}
foreach (var str in invalidEmails)
{
    Console.WriteLine("{0} - {1} ", str, Regex.IsMatch(str, pattern));
}

其他回答

我创建了一个FormValidationUtils类来验证电子邮件:

public static class FormValidationUtils
{
    const string ValidEmailAddressPattern = "^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\\.[A-Z]{2,6}$";

    public static bool IsEmailValid(string email)
    {
        var regex = new Regex(ValidEmailAddressPattern, RegexOptions.IgnoreCase);
        return regex.IsMatch(email);
    }
}

Visual studio已经有很多年了。

\w+([-+.']\w+)*@\w+([-.]\w+)*\.\w+([-.]\w+)*

希望这能有所帮助!

1

^[\w!#$%&'*+\-/=?\^_`{|}~]+(\.[\w!#$%&'*+\-/=?\^_`{|}~]+)*@((([\-\w]+\.)+[a-zA-Z]{2,4})|(([0-9]{1,3}\.){3}[0-9]{1,3}))$

2

^(([^<>()[\]\\.,;:\s@\""]+(\.[^<>()[\]\\.,;:\s@\""]+)*)|(\"".+\""))@((\[[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\])|(([a-zA-Z\-0-9]+\.)+[a-zA-Z]{2,}))$

以下是我从这里收集信息和微软文档后的解决方案:

/// <summary>
/// * TLD support from 2 to 5 chars (modify the values as you want)
/// * Supports: abc@gmail.com.us
/// * Non-sensitive case 
/// * Stops operation if takes longer than 250ms and throw a detailed exception
/// </summary>
/// <param name="email"></param>
/// <returns>valid: true | invalid: false </returns>
/// <exception cref="ArgumentException"></exception>

private bool validateEmailPattern(string email) {
    try {
        return Regex.IsMatch(email,
            @"^([\w\.\-]+)@([\w\-]+)((\.(\w){2,5})+)$",
            RegexOptions.None, TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(250));
    } catch (RegexMatchTimeoutException) {
        // throw an exception explaining the task was failed 
        _ = email ?? throw new ArgumentException("email, Timeout/failed regexr processing.", nameof(email));
    }
}

为什么不使用基于EF6属性的电子邮件验证?

正如您在上面所看到的,电子邮件的Regex验证总是有一些漏洞。如果您使用的是EF6数据注释,则可以通过EmailAddress数据注释属性轻松实现可靠且更强的电子邮件验证。当我在电子邮件输入字段上获得移动设备特定的正则表达式失败时,我不得不删除以前用于电子邮件的正则表达式验证。当数据注释属性用于电子邮件验证时,移动设备上的问题就解决了。

public class LoginViewModel
{
    [EmailAddress(ErrorMessage = "The email format is not valid")]
    public string Email{ get; set; }