根据MDN文档，元素的offsetParent属性将在它或它的任何父元素通过display style属性被隐藏时返回null。只要确保元素不是固定的。一个脚本来检查这个，如果你没有位置:fixed;页面上的元素可能是这样的:

// Where el is the DOM element you'd like to test for visibility
function isHidden(el) {
    return (el.offsetParent === null)
}

另一方面，如果您确实有位置固定的元素可能会在此搜索中被捕获，那么您将不得不遗憾地(并且缓慢地)使用window.getComputedStyle()。这种情况下的函数可能是:

// Where el is the DOM element you'd like to test for visibility
function isHidden(el) {
    var style = window.getComputedStyle(el);
    return (style.display === 'none')
}

选项2可能更简单一点，因为它考虑了更多的边缘情况，但我打赌它也会慢很多，所以如果你不得不多次重复这个操作，最好避免它。

Chrome 105(以及Edge和Opera)和Firefox 106引入了element . checkvisibility()，如果元素是可见的，则返回true，否则返回false。

该函数检查了使元素不可见的各种因素，包括display:none、可见性、内容可见性和不透明度:

let element = document.getElementById("myIcon");
let isVisible = element.checkVisibility({
    checkOpacity: true,      // Check CSS opacity property too
    checkVisibilityCSS: true // Check CSS visibility property too
});

旁注:checkVisibility()以前被称为isVisible()。看这个GitHub问题。 参见这里的checkVisibility()规范草案。

2021的解决方案

根据MDN文档，交互观察器异步观察目标元素与祖先元素或顶级文档视口的交集中的变化。这意味着每当元素与视口相交时，交互观察器就会触发。

截至2021年，除IE外，目前所有浏览器都支持交集观测器。

实现

const el = document.getElementById("your-target-element");
const observer = new IntersectionObserver((entries) => {
    if(entries[0].isIntersecting){
         // el is visible
    } else {
         // el is not visible
    }
});

observer.observe(el); // Asynchronous call

The handler will fire when initially created. And then it will fire every time that it becomes slightly visible or becomes completely not visible. An element is deemed to be not-visible when it's not actually visible within the viewport. So if you scroll down and element goes off the screen, then the observer will trigger and the // el is not visible code will be triggered - even though the element is still "displayed" (i.e. doesn't have display:none or visibility:hidden). What matters is whether there are any pixels of the element that are actually visible within the viewport.

公认的答案对我不起作用。

2020年分解。

The (elem.offsetParent !== null) method works fine in Firefox but not in Chrome. In Chrome position: fixed will also make offsetParent return null even the element if visible in the page. User Phrogz conducted a large test (2,304 divs) on elements with varying properties to demonstrate the issue. https://stackoverflow.com/a/11639664/4481831 . Run it with multiple browsers to see the differences. Demo: //different results in Chrome and Firefox console.log(document.querySelector('#hidden1').offsetParent); //null Chrome & Firefox console.log(document.querySelector('#fixed1').offsetParent); //null in Chrome, not null in Firefox <div id="hidden1" style="display:none;"></div> <div id="fixed1" style="position:fixed;"></div> The (getComputedStyle(elem).display !== 'none') does not work because the element can be invisible because one of the parents display property is set to none, getComputedStyle will not catch that. Demo: var child1 = document.querySelector('#child1'); console.log(getComputedStyle(child1).display); //child will show "block" instead of "none" <div id="parent1" style="display:none;"> <div id="child1" style="display:block"></div> </div> The (elem.clientHeight !== 0). This method is not influenced by position: fixed and it also check if element parents are not-visible. But it has problems with simple elements that do not have a css layout and inline elements, see more here Demo: console.log(document.querySelector('#inline1').clientHeight); //zero console.log(document.querySelector('#div1').clientHeight); //not zero console.log(document.querySelector('#span1').clientHeight); //zero <div id="inline1" style="display:inline">test1 inline</div> <div id="div1">test2 div</div> <span id="span1">test3 span</span> The (elem.getClientRects().length !== 0) may seem to solve the problems of the previous 3 methods. However it has problems with elements that use CSS tricks (other then display: none) to hide in the page. Demo console.log(document.querySelector('#notvisible1').getClientRects().length); console.log(document.querySelector('#notvisible1').clientHeight); console.log(document.querySelector('#notvisible2').getClientRects().length); console.log(document.querySelector('#notvisible2').clientHeight); console.log(document.querySelector('#notvisible3').getClientRects().length); console.log(document.querySelector('#notvisible3').clientHeight); <div id="notvisible1" style="height:0; overflow:hidden; background-color:red;">not visible 1</div> <div id="notvisible2" style="visibility:hidden; background-color:yellow;">not visible 2</div> <div id="notvisible3" style="opacity:0; background-color:blue;">not visible 3</div>

结论。

所以我向你们展示的是没有什么方法是完美的。要进行适当的可见性检查，必须结合使用后3种方法。

根据MDN文档，元素的offsetParent属性将在它或它的任何父元素通过display style属性被隐藏时返回null。只要确保元素不是固定的。一个脚本来检查这个，如果你没有位置:fixed;页面上的元素可能是这样的:

// Where el is the DOM element you'd like to test for visibility
function isHidden(el) {
    return (el.offsetParent === null)
}

另一方面，如果您确实有位置固定的元素可能会在此搜索中被捕获，那么您将不得不遗憾地(并且缓慢地)使用window.getComputedStyle()。这种情况下的函数可能是:

// Where el is the DOM element you'd like to test for visibility
function isHidden(el) {
    var style = window.getComputedStyle(el);
    return (style.display === 'none')
}

选项2可能更简单一点，因为它考虑了更多的边缘情况，但我打赌它也会慢很多，所以如果你不得不多次重复这个操作，最好避免它。

来自http://code.jquery.com/jquery-1.11.1.js的jQuery代码有一个isHidden参数

var isHidden = function( elem, el ) {
    // isHidden might be called from jQuery#filter function;
    // in that case, element will be second argument
    elem = el || elem;
    return jQuery.css( elem, "display" ) === "none" || !jQuery.contains( elem.ownerDocument, elem );
};

因此，看起来有一个与所有者文档相关的额外检查

我想知道这是否真的适用于以下情况:

基于zIndex隐藏在其他元素后面的元素 完全透明的元素使它们不可见 位于屏幕外的元素(即左:-1000px) 具有可见性的元素:隐藏 有显示的元素:无 没有可见文本或子元素的元素 高度或宽度设置为0的元素