在这个帖子中有几个答案告诉你如何去做 通过Array对象的原型扩展Array对象。这很糟糕 IDEA，因为它破坏了语句中的for (i)。

如果你不使用for (i in a) 代码中的任何地方?除非你自己的代码是 只有您正在运行的代码，这是不太可能的 在浏览器内部。我担心如果人们开始扩张 他们的数组对象像这样，堆栈溢出将启动 充斥着一堆神秘的JavaScript错误。

点击这里查看有用的细节。

在我的脑海中…

功能

参数。Callee指的是承载“arguments”变量的函数，所以它可以用来递归匿名函数:

var recurse = function() {
  if (condition) arguments.callee(); //calls recurse() again
}

如果你想做这样的事情，这很有用:

//do something to all array items within an array recursively
myArray.forEach(function(item) {
  if (item instanceof Array) item.forEach(arguments.callee)
  else {/*...*/}
})

对象

关于对象成员有一个有趣的事情:他们可以有任何字符串作为他们的名字:

//these are normal object members
var obj = {
  a : function() {},
  b : function() {}
}
//but we can do this too
var rules = {
  ".layout .widget" : function(element) {},
  "a[href]" : function(element) {}
}
/* 
this snippet searches the page for elements that
match the CSS selectors and applies the respective function to them:
*/
for (var item in rules) {
  var elements = document.querySelectorAll(rules[item]);
  for (var e, i = 0; e = elements[i++];) rules[item](e);
}

字符串

字符串。Split可以将正则表达式作为参数:

"hello world   with  spaces".split(/\s+/g);
//returns an array: ["hello", "world", "with", "spaces"]

字符串。Replace可以将正则表达式作为搜索参数，将函数作为替换参数:

var i = 1;
"foo bar baz ".replace(/\s+/g, function() {return i++});
//returns "foo1bar2baz3"

令人惊讶的是，很多人都没有意识到它也是面向对象的。

JavaScript没有块作用域(但它有闭包，所以让我们称它为偶数?)

var x = 1;
{
   var x = 2;
}
alert(x); // outputs 2

下面是一些有趣的事情:

Comparing NaN with anything (even NaN) is always false, that includes ==, < and >. NaN Stands for Not a Number but if you ask for the type it actually returns a number. Array.sort can take a comparator function and is called by a quicksort-like driver (depends on implementation). Regular expression "constants" can maintain state, like the last thing they matched. Some versions of JavaScript allow you to access $0, $1, $2 members on a regex. null is unlike anything else. It is neither an object, a boolean, a number, a string, nor undefined. It's a bit like an "alternate" undefined. (Note: typeof null == "object") In the outermost context, this yields the otherwise unnameable [Global] object. Declaring a variable with var, instead of just relying on automatic declaration of the variable gives the runtime a real chance of optimizing access to that variable The with construct will destroy such optimzations Variable names can contain Unicode characters. JavaScript regular expressions are not actually regular. They are based on Perl's regexs, and it is possible to construct expressions with lookaheads that take a very, very long time to evaluate. Blocks can be labeled and used as the targets of break. Loops can be labeled and used as the target of continue. Arrays are not sparse. Setting the 1000th element of an otherwise empty array should fill it with undefined. (depends on implementation) if (new Boolean(false)) {...} will execute the {...} block Javascript's regular expression engine's are implementation specific: e.g. it is possible to write "non-portable" regular expressions.

[更新了一点，以回应良好的评论;请参阅评论]

这里有一个简单的思考“this”的方法。函数中的'This'将引用该函数的未来对象实例，通常使用operator new创建。所以很明显，内部函数的“this”永远不会指向外部函数的实例。

以上建议可以让你远离麻烦。但是你可以用“this”做更复杂的事情。

示例1:

     function DriveIn()
     {
          this.car = 'Honda';
          alert(this.food);  //'food' is the attribute of a future object 
                             //and DriveIn does not define it.
     }

     var A = {food:'chili', q:DriveIn};  //create object A whose q attribute 
                                         //is the function DriveIn;

     alert(A.car); //displays 'undefined' 
     A.q();        //displays 'chili' but also defines this.car.
     alert(A.car); //displays 'Honda' 

规则如下:

当一个函数作为一个对象的属性被调用时，在函数内部(但在任何内部函数之外)出现的任何'this'都指向该对象。

我们需要明确，即使使用operator new，“The Rule of This”也适用。在幕后，new通过对象的构造函数属性将“this”附加到对象上。

示例2:

      function Insect ()
      {
           this.bug = "bee";
           this.bugFood = function()
           {
               alert("nectar");
           }
       }

      var B = new Insect();
      alert(B.constructor); //displays "Insect"; By "The Rule of This" any
                            //ocurrence of 'this' inside Insect now refers 
                            //to B.    

为了更清楚地说明这一点，我们可以不使用operator new创建一个Insect实例。

示例3:

   
    var C = {constructor:Insect};  //Assign the constructor attribute of C, 
                                   //the value Insect.
    C.constructor();               //Call Insect through the attribute. 
                                   //C is now an Insect instance as though it 
                                   //were created with operator new. [*]
    alert(C.bug);                  //Displays "bee." 
    C.bugFood();                   //Displays "nectar." 

[*]我能辨别的唯一实际区别是，在示例3中，'constructor'是一个可枚举属性。当使用operator new时，'constructor'变成一个属性，但不是可枚举的。如果for-in操作"for(var name in object)"返回该属性的名称，则该属性是可枚举的。