使用systemd，您只需要稍微修改您的服务以接受预激活的套接字。

稍后可以使用systemd套接字激活。

不需要任何功能、iptables或其他技巧。

这是这个简单的python http服务器示例中的相关systemd文件的内容

文件httpd-true.service

[Unit]
Description=Httpd true 

[Service]
ExecStart=/usr/local/bin/httpd-true
User=subsonic

PrivateTmp=yes

文件httpd-true.socket

[Unit]
Description=HTTPD true

[Socket]
ListenStream=80

[Install]
WantedBy=default.target

标准方法是将它们设置为“setuid”，以便它们以根用户身份启动，然后在它们绑定到端口但开始接受到该端口的连接之前丢弃根用户特权。您可以在Apache和INN的源代码中看到这样的好例子。我听说莱特特警局是另一个很好的例子。

另一个例子是Postfix，它使用多个通过管道通信的守护进程，其中只有一两个守护进程(除了接受或发出字节外几乎不做任何事情)以根身份运行，其余的守护进程以较低的权限运行。

我知道这是一个老问题，但是现在有了最新的(>= 4.3)内核，这个问题终于有了一个很好的答案——环境能力。

快速的答案是从git中获取libcap的最新(尚未发布的)版本的副本并编译它。将生成的progs/capsh二进制文件复制到某个地方(/usr/local/bin是一个不错的选择)。然后，作为根用户，使用

/usr/local/bin/capsh --keep=1 --user='your-service-user-name' \
    --inh='cap_net_bind_service' --addamb='cap_net_bind_service' \ 
    -- -c 'your-program'

按顺序，我们是

声明当切换用户时，我们希望保持当前的功能集 切换用户和组到“your-service-user-name” 将cap_net_bind_service功能添加到继承的&环境集 派生bash -c 'your-command'(因为capsh会自动用——后面的参数启动bash)

这里隐藏着很多秘密。

Firstly, we are running as root, so by default, we get a full set of capabilities. Included in this is the ability to switch uid & gid with the setuid and setgid syscalls. However, ordinarily when a program does this, it loses its set of capabilities - this is so that the old way of dropping root with setuid still works. The --keep=1 flag tells capsh to issue the prctl(PR_SET_KEEPCAPS) syscall, which disables the dropping of capabilities when changing user. The actual changing of users by capsh happens with the --user flag, which runs setuid and setgid.

The next problem we need to solve is how to set capabilities in a way that carries on after we exec our children. The capabilities system has always had an 'inherited' set of capabilities, which is " a set of capabilities preserved across an execve(2)" [capabilities(7)]. Whilst this sounds like it solves our problem (just set the cap_net_bind_service capability to inherited, right?), this actually only applies for privileged processes - and our process is not privileged anymore, because we already changed user (with the --user flag).

新的环境能力集解决了这个问题——它是“在一个没有特权的程序的执行中保存的一组能力。”通过将cap_net_bind_service放在环境集中，当capsh exec执行我们的服务器程序时，我们的程序将继承此功能，并能够将侦听器绑定到低端口。

如果您有兴趣了解更多信息，功能手册页详细解释了这一点。通过strace运行capsh也是非常有用的!

出于某种原因，没有人提到降低sysctl net.ipv4。Ip_unprivileged_port_start到您需要的值。 示例:我们需要将应用程序绑定到443端口。

sysctl net.ipv4.ip_unprivileged_port_start=443

有些人可能会说，存在潜在的安全问题:非特权用户现在可能绑定到其他特权端口(444-1024)。 但是你可以用iptables通过阻塞其他端口轻松解决这个问题:

iptables -I INPUT -p tcp --dport 444:1024 -j DROP
iptables -I INPUT -p udp --dport 444:1024 -j DROP

与其他方法的比较。这个方法:

from some point is (IMO) even more secure than setting CAP_NET_BIND_SERVICE/setuid, since an application doesn't setuid at all, even partly (capabilities actually are). For example, to catch a coredump of capability-enabled application you will need to change sysctl fs.suid_dumpable (which leads to another potential security problems) Also, when CAP/suid is set, /proc/PID directory is owned by root, so your non-root user will not have full information/control of running process, for example, user will not be able (in common case) to determine which connections belong to application via /proc/PID/fd/ (netstat -aptn | grep PID). has security disadvantage: while your app (or any app that uses ports 443-1024) is down for some reason, another app could take the port. But this problem could also be applied to CAP/suid (in case you set it on interpreter, e.g. java/nodejs) and iptables-redirect. Use systemd-socket method to exclude this problem. Use authbind method to only allow special user binding. doesn't require setting CAP/suid every time you deploy new version of application. doesn't require application support/modification, like systemd-socket method. doesn't require kernel rebuild (if running version supports this sysctl setting) doesn't do LD_PRELOAD like authbind/privbind method, this could potentially affect performance, security, behavior (does it? haven't tested). In the rest authbind is really flexible and secure method. over-performs iptables REDIRECT/DNAT method, since it doesn't require address translation, connection state tracking, etc. This only noticeable on high-load systems.

根据具体情况，我将在sysctl、CAP、authbind和iptables-redirect之间进行选择。我们有这么多选择真是太好了。

文件功能并不理想，因为它们可能在包更新后失效。

恕我直言，理想的解决方案应该是能够创建具有可继承CAP_NET_BIND_SERVICE集的shell。

这里有一个有点复杂的方法:

sg $DAEMONUSER "capsh --keep=1 --uid=`id -u $DAEMONUSER` \
     --caps='cap_net_bind_service+pei' -- \
     YOUR_COMMAND_GOES_HERE"

capsh实用程序可以在Debian/Ubuntu发行版的libcap2-bin包中找到。事情是这样的:

sg将生效的组ID修改为守护用户的组ID。这是必要的，因为capsh会使GID保持不变，而我们肯定不想要它。 设置位“保持UID更改的能力”。 修改UID为$DAEMONUSER 删除所有的大写(此时所有的大写仍然存在，因为——keep=1)，除了可继承的cap_net_bind_service 执行命令(“——”是分隔符)

结果是一个具有指定用户和组以及cap_net_bind_service特权的进程。

例如，ejabberd启动脚本中的一行:

sg $EJABBERDUSER "capsh --keep=1 --uid=`id -u $EJABBERDUSER` --caps='cap_net_bind_service+pei' -- $EJABBERD --noshell -detached"

您可以进行端口重定向。这就是我为运行在Linux机器上的Silverlight策略服务器所做的工作

iptables -A PREROUTING -t nat -i eth0 -p tcp --dport 943 -j REDIRECT --to-port 1300