如果你不需要传递任何参数，一个简单的解决方法是使用valueForKeyPath。这甚至可以在Class对象上实现。

NSString *colorName = @"brightPinkColor";
id uicolor = [UIColor class];
if ([uicolor respondsToSelector:NSSelectorFromString(colorName)]){
    UIColor *brightPink = [uicolor valueForKeyPath:colorName];
    ...
}

要使用执行选择器忽略文件中的错误，添加一个#pragma，如下所示:

#pragma clang diagnostic ignored "-Warc-performSelector-leaks"

这将忽略这一行上的警告，但仍然允许它贯穿整个项目的其余部分。

不要压制警告!

有不少于12个可选的解决方案来修补编译器。 虽然在第一次实现时你很聪明，但地球上很少有工程师能追随你的脚步，而这段代码最终会崩溃。

安全的路线:

所有这些解决方案都是可行的，只是在一定程度上与您的初衷有所不同。假设param可以为nil:

安全路线，相同的概念行为:

// GREAT
[_controller performSelectorOnMainThread:selector withObject:anArgument waitUntilDone:YES];
[_controller performSelectorOnMainThread:selector withObject:anArgument waitUntilDone:YES modes:@[(__bridge NSString *)kCFRunLoopDefaultMode]];

[_controller performSelector:selector onThread:[NSThread mainThread] withObject:anArgument waitUntilDone:YES];
[_controller performSelector:selector onThread:[NSThread mainThread] withObject:anArgument waitUntilDone:YES modes:@[(__bridge NSString *)kCFRunLoopDefaultMode]];

安全路线，行为稍有不同:

(见此回复) 使用任何线程代替[NSThread主线程]。

// GOOD
[_controller performSelector:selector withObject:anArgument afterDelay:0];
[_controller performSelector:selector withObject:anArgument afterDelay:0 inModes:@[(__bridge NSString *)kCFRunLoopDefaultMode]];

[_controller performSelectorOnMainThread:selector withObject:anArgument waitUntilDone:NO];
[_controller performSelectorOnMainThread:selector withObject:anArgument waitUntilDone:NO];
[_controller performSelectorOnMainThread:selector withObject:anArgument waitUntilDone:NO modes:@[(__bridge NSString *)kCFRunLoopDefaultMode]];

[_controller performSelectorInBackground:selector withObject:anArgument];

[_controller performSelector:selector onThread:[NSThread mainThread] withObject:anArgument waitUntilDone:NO];
[_controller performSelector:selector onThread:[NSThread mainThread] withObject:anArgument waitUntilDone:NO modes:@[(__bridge NSString *)kCFRunLoopDefaultMode]];

危险的路线

需要某种编译器静音，这是必然的破坏。请注意，目前，它确实在Swift中中断了。

// AT YOUR OWN RISK
[_controller performSelector:selector];
[_controller performSelector:selector withObject:anArgument];
[_controller performSelector:selector withObject:anArgument withObject:nil];

为了子孙后代着想，我决定参加竞选:)

最近，我看到越来越多的重构偏离了目标/选择器范式，而倾向于协议、块等。然而，我已经使用过几次的performSelector有一个替代物:

[NSApp sendAction: NSSelectorFromString(@"someMethod") to: _controller from: nil];

这些似乎是一个干净的，弧安全的，和几乎相同的替代performSelector没有太多的objc_msgSend()。

不过，我不知道iOS上是否有类似的功能。

我的猜测是这样的:因为选择器对编译器是未知的，ARC不能强制执行适当的内存管理。

事实上，有时内存管理通过特定的约定与方法的名称绑定在一起。具体来说，我在考虑方便构造函数和make方法;前者按照约定返回一个自动释放的对象;后者是一个保留对象。该约定基于选择器的名称，因此如果编译器不知道选择器，那么它就不能强制执行正确的内存管理规则。

如果这是正确的，我认为你可以安全地使用你的代码，只要你确保内存管理一切正常(例如，你的方法不返回它们分配的对象)。

这里有很多答案，但由于这个有点不同，我把几个答案结合起来，我想我应该把它放进去。我使用一个NSObject类别检查，以确保选择器返回void，也抑制编译器警告。

#import <Foundation/Foundation.h>
#import <objc/runtime.h>
#import "Debug.h" // not given; just an assert

@interface NSObject (Extras)

// Enforce the rule that the selector used must return void.
- (void) performVoidReturnSelector:(SEL)aSelector withObject:(id)object;
- (void) performVoidReturnSelector:(SEL)aSelector;

@end

@implementation NSObject (Extras)

// Apparently the reason the regular performSelect gives a compile time warning is that the system doesn't know the return type. I'm going to (a) make sure that the return type is void, and (b) disable this warning
// See http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7017281/performselector-may-cause-a-leak-because-its-selector-is-unknown

- (void) checkSelector:(SEL)aSelector {
    // See http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14602854/objective-c-is-there-a-way-to-check-a-selector-return-value
    Method m = class_getInstanceMethod([self class], aSelector);
    char type[128];
    method_getReturnType(m, type, sizeof(type));

    NSString *message = [[NSString alloc] initWithFormat:@"NSObject+Extras.performVoidReturnSelector: %@.%@ selector (type: %s)", [self class], NSStringFromSelector(aSelector), type];
    NSLog(@"%@", message);

    if (type[0] != 'v') {
        message = [[NSString alloc] initWithFormat:@"%@ was not void", message];
        [Debug assertTrue:FALSE withMessage:message];
    }
}

- (void) performVoidReturnSelector:(SEL)aSelector withObject:(id)object {
    [self checkSelector:aSelector];

#pragma clang diagnostic push
#pragma clang diagnostic ignored "-Warc-performSelector-leaks"
    // Since the selector (aSelector) is returning void, it doesn't make sense to try to obtain the return result of performSelector. In fact, if we do, it crashes the app.
    [self performSelector: aSelector withObject: object];
#pragma clang diagnostic pop    
}

- (void) performVoidReturnSelector:(SEL)aSelector {
    [self checkSelector:aSelector];

#pragma clang diagnostic push
#pragma clang diagnostic ignored "-Warc-performSelector-leaks"
    [self performSelector: aSelector];
#pragma clang diagnostic pop
}

@end