从Steve的回答开始，三元操作符可以使用:

public int compareTo(Person other) {
    int f = firstName.compareTo(other.firstName);
    int l = lastName.compareTo(other.lastName);
    return f != 0 ? f : l != 0 ? l : Integer.compare(age, other.age);
}

要连续排序多个字段，请尝试ComparatorChain

A ComparatorChain is a Comparator that wraps one or more Comparators in sequence. The ComparatorChain calls each Comparator in sequence until either 1) any single Comparator returns a non-zero result (and that result is then returned), or 2) the ComparatorChain is exhausted (and zero is returned). This type of sorting is very similar to multi-column sorting in SQL, and this class allows Java classes to emulate that kind of behaviour when sorting a List. To further facilitate SQL-like sorting, the order of any single Comparator in the list can >be reversed. Calling a method that adds new Comparators or changes the ascend/descend sort after compare(Object, Object) has been called will result in an UnsupportedOperationException. However, take care to not alter the underlying List of Comparators or the BitSet that defines the sort order. Instances of ComparatorChain are not synchronized. The class is not thread-safe at construction time, but it is thread-safe to perform multiple comparisons after all the setup operations are complete.

从Steve的回答开始，三元操作符可以使用:

public int compareTo(Person other) {
    int f = firstName.compareTo(other.firstName);
    int l = lastName.compareTo(other.lastName);
    return f != 0 ? f : l != 0 ? l : Integer.compare(age, other.age);
}

import com.google.common.collect.ComparisonChain;

/**
 * @author radler
 * Class Description ...
 */
public class Attribute implements Comparable<Attribute> {

    private String type;
    private String value;

    public String getType() { return type; }
    public void setType(String type) { this.type = type; }

    public String getValue() { return value; }
    public void setValue(String value) { this.value = value; }

    @Override
    public String toString() {
        return "Attribute [type=" + type + ", value=" + value + "]";
    }

    @Override
    public int compareTo(Attribute that) {
        return ComparisonChain.start()
            .compare(this.type, that.type)
            .compare(this.value, that.value)
            .result();
    }

}

(来自Java中基于多个字段对对象列表进行排序的方法)

工作代码在这个要点

使用Java 8 lambda(2019年4月10日添加)

Java 8通过lambda很好地解决了这个问题(尽管Guava和Apache Commons可能仍然提供了更大的灵活性):

Collections.sort(reportList, Comparator.comparing(Report::getReportKey)
            .thenComparing(Report::getStudentNumber)
            .thenComparing(Report::getSchool));

感谢@高公的回答。

杂乱而复杂:手工分类

Collections.sort(pizzas, new Comparator<Pizza>() {  
    @Override  
    public int compare(Pizza p1, Pizza p2) {  
        int sizeCmp = p1.size.compareTo(p2.size);  
        if (sizeCmp != 0) {  
            return sizeCmp;  
        }  
        int nrOfToppingsCmp = p1.nrOfToppings.compareTo(p2.nrOfToppings);  
        if (nrOfToppingsCmp != 0) {  
            return nrOfToppingsCmp;  
        }  
        return p1.name.compareTo(p2.name);  
    }  
});  

这需要大量的输入和维护，而且很容易出错。

反射方式:用BeanComparator排序

ComparatorChain chain = new ComparatorChain(Arrays.asList(
   new BeanComparator("size"), 
   new BeanComparator("nrOfToppings"), 
   new BeanComparator("name")));

Collections.sort(pizzas, chain);  

显然，这更简洁，但更容易出错，因为使用string而失去了对字段的直接引用(没有类型安全，自动重构)。现在，如果字段被重命名，编译器甚至不会报告问题。此外，由于该解决方案使用反射，排序要慢得多。

到达那里:排序谷歌番石榴的ComparisonChain

Collections.sort(pizzas, new Comparator<Pizza>() {  
    @Override  
    public int compare(Pizza p1, Pizza p2) {  
        return ComparisonChain.start().compare(p1.size, p2.size).compare(p1.nrOfToppings, p2.nrOfToppings).compare(p1.name, p2.name).result();  
        // or in case the fields can be null:  
        /* 
        return ComparisonChain.start() 
           .compare(p1.size, p2.size, Ordering.natural().nullsLast()) 
           .compare(p1.nrOfToppings, p2.nrOfToppings, Ordering.natural().nullsLast()) 
           .compare(p1.name, p2.name, Ordering.natural().nullsLast()) 
           .result(); 
        */  
    }  
});  

这样好多了，但对于最常见的用例，需要一些样板代码:默认情况下，null值的值应该更小。对于空字段，您必须向Guava提供一个额外的指令，在这种情况下要做什么。如果你想做一些特定的事情，这是一个灵活的机制，但通常你想要默认的情况(即。1, a, b, z, null)。

使用Apache Commons CompareToBuilder进行排序

Collections.sort(pizzas, new Comparator<Pizza>() {  
    @Override  
    public int compare(Pizza p1, Pizza p2) {  
        return new CompareToBuilder().append(p1.size, p2.size).append(p1.nrOfToppings, p2.nrOfToppings).append(p1.name, p2.name).toComparison();  
    }  
});  

像Guava的ComparisonChain一样，这个库类很容易在多个字段上排序，但也为空值定义了默认行为。1, a, b, z, null)。但是，您也不能指定任何其他内容，除非您提供自己的Comparator。

Thus

最终，这归结于口味和灵活性的需要(Guava的ComparisonChain) vs.简洁的代码(Apache的CompareToBuilder)。

额外的方法

我发现了一个很好的解决方案，在MultiComparator的CodeReview中按优先级顺序组合多个比较器:

class MultiComparator<T> implements Comparator<T> {
    private final List<Comparator<T>> comparators;

    public MultiComparator(List<Comparator<? super T>> comparators) {
        this.comparators = comparators;
    }

    public MultiComparator(Comparator<? super T>... comparators) {
        this(Arrays.asList(comparators));
    }

    public int compare(T o1, T o2) {
        for (Comparator<T> c : comparators) {
            int result = c.compare(o1, o2);
            if (result != 0) {
                return result;
            }
        }
        return 0;
    }

    public static <T> void sort(List<T> list, Comparator<? super T>... comparators) {
        Collections.sort(list, new MultiComparator<T>(comparators));
    }
}

当然Apache Commons Collections已经有了一个util:

ComparatorUtils.chainedComparator (comparatorCollection)

Collections.sort(list, ComparatorUtils.chainedComparator(comparators));

在java中使用hashcode方法比较两个对象很容易。

public class Sample{

  String a=null;
  String b=null;

  public Sample(){
      a="s";
      b="a";
  }
  public Sample(String a,String b){
      this.a=a;
      this.b=b;
  }
  public static void main(String args[]){
      Sample f=new Sample("b","12");
      Sample s=new Sample("b","12");
      //will return true
      System.out.println((s.a.hashCode()+s.b.hashCode())==(f.a.hashCode()+f.b.hashCode()));

      //will return false
      Sample f=new Sample("b","12");
      Sample s=new Sample("b","13");
      System.out.println((s.a.hashCode()+s.b.hashCode())==(f.a.hashCode()+f.b.hashCode()));

}