我刚刚在c# 2.0中写了一个字符串反向函数(即LINQ不可用)，然后想到了这个:
public string Reverse(string text)
{
char[] cArray = text.ToCharArray();
string reverse = String.Empty;
for (int i = cArray.Length - 1; i > -1; i--)
{
reverse += cArray[i];
}
return reverse;
}
就我个人而言，我并不喜欢这个功能，我相信有更好的方法来实现它。是吗?
当前回答
好吧，为了“不要重复你自己”，我提供以下解决方案:
public string Reverse(string text)
{
return Microsoft.VisualBasic.Strings.StrReverse(text);
}
我的理解是这个实现，在VB中默认可用。NET，正确地处理Unicode字符。
其他回答
抱歉写了这么长时间，但这可能会很有趣
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Diagnostics;
using System.Text;
namespace ConsoleApplication1
{
class Program
{
public static string ReverseUsingArrayClass(string text)
{
char[] chars = text.ToCharArray();
Array.Reverse(chars);
return new string(chars);
}
public static string ReverseUsingCharacterBuffer(string text)
{
char[] charArray = new char[text.Length];
int inputStrLength = text.Length - 1;
for (int idx = 0; idx <= inputStrLength; idx++)
{
charArray[idx] = text[inputStrLength - idx];
}
return new string(charArray);
}
public static string ReverseUsingStringBuilder(string text)
{
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(text))
{
return text;
}
StringBuilder builder = new StringBuilder(text.Length);
for (int i = text.Length - 1; i >= 0; i--)
{
builder.Append(text[i]);
}
return builder.ToString();
}
private static string ReverseUsingStack(string input)
{
Stack<char> resultStack = new Stack<char>();
foreach (char c in input)
{
resultStack.Push(c);
}
StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
while (resultStack.Count > 0)
{
sb.Append(resultStack.Pop());
}
return sb.ToString();
}
public static string ReverseUsingXOR(string text)
{
char[] charArray = text.ToCharArray();
int length = text.Length - 1;
for (int i = 0; i < length; i++, length--)
{
charArray[i] ^= charArray[length];
charArray[length] ^= charArray[i];
charArray[i] ^= charArray[length];
}
return new string(charArray);
}
static void Main(string[] args)
{
string testString = string.Join(";", new string[] {
new string('a', 100),
new string('b', 101),
new string('c', 102),
new string('d', 103),
});
int cycleCount = 100000;
Stopwatch stopwatch = new Stopwatch();
stopwatch.Start();
for (int i = 0; i < cycleCount; i++)
{
ReverseUsingCharacterBuffer(testString);
}
stopwatch.Stop();
Console.WriteLine("ReverseUsingCharacterBuffer: " + stopwatch.ElapsedMilliseconds + "ms");
stopwatch.Reset();
stopwatch.Start();
for (int i = 0; i < cycleCount; i++)
{
ReverseUsingArrayClass(testString);
}
stopwatch.Stop();
Console.WriteLine("ReverseUsingArrayClass: " + stopwatch.ElapsedMilliseconds + "ms");
stopwatch.Reset();
stopwatch.Start();
for (int i = 0; i < cycleCount; i++)
{
ReverseUsingStringBuilder(testString);
}
stopwatch.Stop();
Console.WriteLine("ReverseUsingStringBuilder: " + stopwatch.ElapsedMilliseconds + "ms");
stopwatch.Reset();
stopwatch.Start();
for (int i = 0; i < cycleCount; i++)
{
ReverseUsingStack(testString);
}
stopwatch.Stop();
Console.WriteLine("ReverseUsingStack: " + stopwatch.ElapsedMilliseconds + "ms");
stopwatch.Reset();
stopwatch.Start();
for (int i = 0; i < cycleCount; i++)
{
ReverseUsingXOR(testString);
}
stopwatch.Stop();
Console.WriteLine("ReverseUsingXOR: " + stopwatch.ElapsedMilliseconds + "ms");
}
}
}
结果:
ReverseUsingCharacterBuffer: 346毫秒 ReverseUsingArrayClass: 87毫秒 ReverseUsingStringBuilder: 824毫秒 ReverseUsingStack: 2086毫秒 ReverseUsingXOR: 319毫秒
string original = "Stack Overflow";
string reversed = new string(original.Reverse().ToArray());
在使用StringInfo.GetTextElementEnumerator()的地方有几个正确答案。向你致敬!
现在，让我们找出最有效的方法来使用这个方法。首先，大多数答案涉及调用Reverse()和ToArray()，这在热路径上是一个大禁忌。为了获得最佳性能，我们希望避免分配垃圾。例如，临时字符串，分配器，数组等。
优化的管柱反转
降低气相色谱压力。也就是说，没有LINQ枚举器，没有数组。 使用跨 使用String.Create ()
using System.Globalization;
public static class StringExtensions
{
public static string AsReversed(this string s)
{
return string.Create(s.Length, s, (chars, state) =>
{
int i = 0;
var enumerator = StringInfo.GetTextElementEnumerator(s);
while (enumerator.MoveNext())
{
var element = enumerator.GetTextElement();
i += element.Length;
element.CopyTo(chars[^i..]);
}
});
}
}
请注意，GetTextElementEnumerator() API在. net Core 3.1和更早的版本中包含一个错误。确保运行。net 5或更高版本!最后，请务必查看正在讨论API改进的问题#19423。
Greg Beech发布了一个不安全的选项，它确实很快(这是一个原地逆转);但是，正如他在回答中指出的那样，这完全是一个灾难性的想法。
也就是说，我很惊讶有这么多的共识，Array。逆向是最快的方法。仍然有一种不安全的方法，它返回字符串的反向副本(没有原地反转的恶作剧)，比Array快得多。小字符串的反向方法:
public static unsafe string Reverse(string text)
{
int len = text.Length;
// Why allocate a char[] array on the heap when you won't use it
// outside of this method? Use the stack.
char* reversed = stackalloc char[len];
// Avoid bounds-checking performance penalties.
fixed (char* str = text)
{
int i = 0;
int j = i + len - 1;
while (i < len)
{
reversed[i++] = str[j--];
}
}
// Need to use this overload for the System.String constructor
// as providing just the char* pointer could result in garbage
// at the end of the string (no guarantee of null terminator).
return new string(reversed, 0, len);
}
以下是一些基准测试结果。
您可以看到，相对于Array，性能增益会缩小，然后消失。当字符串变大时，反向方法。然而，对于小型到中型的字符串，很难击败这种方法。
我在面试中也被问到类似的问题。这是我的回答，尽管它在性能上可能没有其他答案那么快。我的问题是“创建一个类，它可以有一个反向打印字符串的方法”:
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
namespace BackwardsTest
{
class PrintBackwards
{
public static void print(string param)
{
if (param == null || param.Length == 0)
{
Console.WriteLine("string is null");
return;
}
List<char> list = new List<char>();
string returned = null;
foreach(char d in param)
{
list.Add(d);
}
for(int i = list.Count(); i > 0; i--)
{
returned = returned + list[list.Count - 1];
list.RemoveAt(list.Count - 1);
}
Console.WriteLine(returned);
}
}
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
string test = "I want to print backwards";
PrintBackwards.print(test);
System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(5000);
}
}
}
