这绝对是主观的，但我想尽量避免它变成争论。我认为如果人们恰当地对待它，这将是一个有趣的问题。
这个问题的想法来自于我对“你最讨厌的语言的哪五件事?”问题的回答。我认为c#中的类在默认情况下应该是密封的——我不会把我的理由放在这个问题上，但我可能会写一个更完整的解释来回答这个问题。我对评论中的讨论热度感到惊讶(目前有25条评论)。
那么，你有什么有争议的观点?我宁愿避免那些基于相对较少的基础而导致相当宗教的事情(例如，大括号放置)，但例如可能包括“单元测试实际上并没有多大帮助”或“公共字段确实是可以的”之类的事情。重要的是(至少对我来说)你的观点背后是有理由的。
请提出你的观点和理由——我鼓励人们投票给那些有充分论证和有趣的观点，不管你是否恰好同意这些观点。
当前回答
没有面向对象编程这种东西。
其他回答
Visual Basic和c#都不能胜过对方。除了一些语法和格式之外，它们几乎是一样的。
我有一些…凡事都有例外，所以这些并不是一成不变的，但它们确实适用于大多数情况
没有人关心您的网站是否经过验证、是否严格遵守XHTML、是否符合标准或是否有W3C标记。
It may earn you some high-fives from fellow Web developers, but the rest of people looking at your site could give a crap whether you've validated your code or not. the vast majority of Web surfers are using IE or Firefox, and since both of those browsers are forgiving of nonstandards, nonstrict, invalidated HTML then you really dont need to worry about it. If you've built a site for a car dealer, a mechanic, a radio station, a church, or a local small business, how many people in any of those businesses' target demographics do you think care about valid HTML? I'd hazard a guess it's pretty close to 0.
大多数开源软件都是无用的、过于复杂的垃圾。
Let me install this nice piece of OSS I've found. It looks like it should do exactly what I want! Oh wait, first I have to install this other window manager thingy. OK. Then i need to get this command-line tool and add it to my path. Now I need the latest runtimes for X, Y, and Z. now i need to make sure i have these processes running. ok, great... its all configured. Now let me learn a whole new set of commands to use it. Oh cool, someone built a GUI for it. I guess I don't need to learn these commands. Wait, I need this library on here to get the GUI to work. Gotta download that now. ok, now its working...crap, I can't figure out this terrible UI.
sound familiar? OSS is full of complication for complication's sake, tricky installs that you need to be an expert to perform, and tools that most people wouldn't know what to do with anyway. So many projects fall by the wayside, others are so niche that very few people would use them, and some of the decent ones (FlowPlayer, OSCommerce, etc) have such ridiculously overcomplicated and bloated source code that it defeats the purpose of being able to edit the source. You can edit the source... if you can figure out which of the 400 files contains the code that needs modification. You're really in trouble when you learn that its all 400 of them.
递归最糟糕的地方就是递归。
我的一个:
长开关语句是你的朋友。真的。至少在c#中是这样。
人们倾向于避免和不鼓励其他人使用长switch语句，因为它们“不可管理”和“具有糟糕的性能特征”。
好吧，在c#中，switch语句总是自动编译为哈希跳转表，所以如果你需要简单的分支到多个分支，实际上使用它们是性能方面的最佳选择。同样，如果case语句被智能地组织和分组(例如按字母顺序)，那么它们就不是无法管理的。
初级程序员在被允许实际编写或修改代码之前，应该被分配做几个月的对象/模块设计和设计维护。
太多的程序员/开发人员在工作了5年或10年之后，还没有理解好的设计的要素。当他们想要超越编写和维护代码时，这可能会让他们陷入瘫痪。
