什么时候应该使用ThreadLocal变量?
它是如何使用的?
什么时候应该使用ThreadLocal变量?
它是如何使用的?
当前回答
ThreadLocal in Java had been introduced on JDK 1.2 but was later generified in JDK 1.5 to introduce type safety on ThreadLocal variable. ThreadLocal can be associated with Thread scope, all the code which is executed by Thread has access to ThreadLocal variables but two thread can not see each others ThreadLocal variable. Each thread holds an exclusive copy of ThreadLocal variable which becomes eligible to Garbage collection after thread finished or died, normally or due to any Exception, Given those ThreadLocal variable doesn't have any other live references. ThreadLocal variables in Java are generally private static fields in Classes and maintain its state inside Thread.
阅读更多:Java示例程序和教程中的ThreadLocal
其他回答
Many frameworks use ThreadLocals to maintain some context related to the current thread. For example when the current transaction is stored in a ThreadLocal, you don't need to pass it as a parameter through every method call, in case someone down the stack needs access to it. Web applications might store information about the current request and session in a ThreadLocal, so that the application has easy access to them. With Guice you can use ThreadLocals when implementing custom scopes for the injected objects (Guice's default servlet scopes most probably use them as well).
ThreadLocals are one sort of global variables (although slightly less evil because they are restricted to one thread), so you should be careful when using them to avoid unwanted side-effects and memory leaks. Design your APIs so that the ThreadLocal values will always be automatically cleared when they are not needed anymore and that incorrect use of the API won't be possible (for example like this). ThreadLocals can be used to make the code cleaner, and in some rare cases they are the only way to make something work (my current project had two such cases; they are documented here under "Static Fields and Global Variables").
ThreadLocal will ensure accessing the mutable object by the multiple threads in the non synchronized method is synchronized, means making the mutable object to be immutable within the method. This is achieved by giving new instance of mutable object for each thread try accessing it. So It is local copy to the each thread. This is some hack on making instance variable in a method to be accessed like a local variable. As you aware method local variable is only available to the thread, one difference is; method local variables will not available to the thread once method execution is over where as mutable object shared with threadlocal will be available across multiple methods till we clean it up.
通过定义:
Java中的ThreadLocal类允许您创建这样的变量 只能在同一线程上读写。这样,即使是两个线程 正在执行相同的代码,并且该代码有一个对 变量ThreadLocal,那么两个线程不能看到彼此的线程 ThreadLocal变量。
java中的每个线程都包含ThreadLocalMap。 在哪里
Key = One ThreadLocal object shared across threads.
value = Mutable object which has to be used synchronously, this will be instantiated for each thread.
实现ThreadLocal:
现在为ThreadLocal创建一个包装器类,它将保存如下所示的可变对象(有或没有initialValue())。现在这个包装器的getter和setter将工作于threadlocal实例,而不是可变对象。
如果threadlocal的getter()在线程的threadlocalmap中没有找到任何值;然后它将调用initialValue()来获得它相对于线程的私有副本。
class SimpleDateFormatInstancePerThread {
private static final ThreadLocal<SimpleDateFormat> dateFormatHolder = new ThreadLocal<SimpleDateFormat>() {
@Override
protected SimpleDateFormat initialValue() {
SimpleDateFormat dateFormat = new SimpleDateFormat("yyyy-MM-dd") {
UUID id = UUID.randomUUID();
@Override
public String toString() {
return id.toString();
};
};
System.out.println("Creating SimpleDateFormat instance " + dateFormat +" for Thread : " + Thread.currentThread().getName());
return dateFormat;
}
};
/*
* Every time there is a call for DateFormat, ThreadLocal will return calling
* Thread's copy of SimpleDateFormat
*/
public static DateFormat getDateFormatter() {
return dateFormatHolder.get();
}
public static void cleanup() {
dateFormatHolder.remove();
}
}
现在wrapper.getDateFormatter()将调用threadlocal.get()并检查currentThread。threadLocalMap包含这个(threadlocal)实例。 如果是,返回对应threadlocal实例的值(SimpleDateFormat) 否则使用这个threadlocal实例initialValue()添加映射。
在此可变类上实现线程安全;每个线程都使用自己的可变实例,但使用相同的ThreadLocal实例。意味着所有线程将共享相同的ThreadLocal实例作为key,但不同的SimpleDateFormat实例作为value。
https://github.com/skanagavelu/yt.tech/blob/master/src/ThreadLocalTest.java
什么时候?
当一个对象不是线程安全的时候,为了避免影响可伸缩性的同步,给每个线程一个对象,并保持它的线程作用域,即ThreadLocal。最常用但不是线程安全的对象之一是数据库Connection和JMSConnection。
如何?
例如,Spring框架通过将这些连接对象保存在ThreadLocal变量中,在幕后大量使用ThreadLocal来管理事务。在高层,当事务启动时,它获得连接(并禁用自动提交)并将其保存在ThreadLocal中。在进一步的db调用中,它使用相同的连接与db通信。最后,它从ThreadLocal获取连接,提交(或回滚)事务并释放连接。
我认为log4j也使用ThreadLocal来维护MDC。
一种可能的(也是常见的)用途是,当您有一些不是线程安全的对象,但您希望避免同步访问该对象(我正在看您,SimpleDateFormat)。相反,给每个线程它自己的对象实例。
例如:
public class Foo
{
// SimpleDateFormat is not thread-safe, so give one to each thread
private static final ThreadLocal<SimpleDateFormat> formatter = new ThreadLocal<SimpleDateFormat>(){
@Override
protected SimpleDateFormat initialValue()
{
return new SimpleDateFormat("yyyyMMdd HHmm");
}
};
public String formatIt(Date date)
{
return formatter.get().format(date);
}
}
文档。
当您希望某些状态不应该在不同线程之间共享,但每个线程在其整个生命周期内都可以访问时,ThreadLocal非常有用。
As an example, imagine a web application, where each request is served by a different thread. Imagine that for each request you need a piece of data multiple times, which is quite expensive to compute. However, that data might have changed for each incoming request, which means that you can't use a plain cache. A simple, quick solution to this problem would be to have a ThreadLocal variable holding access to this data, so that you have to calculate it only once for each request. Of course, this problem can also be solved without the use of ThreadLocal, but I devised it for illustration purposes.
也就是说,请记住ThreadLocals本质上是一种全局状态的形式。因此,它有许多其他含义,只有在考虑了所有其他可能的解决方案后才应该使用。