一位同事从未听说过这个词,我也无法给出一个确切的定义。对我来说,这一直是一个“我看到什么就知道什么”的例子。
附带问题,这个词是谁发明的?
一位同事从未听说过这个词,我也无法给出一个确切的定义。对我来说,这一直是一个“我看到什么就知道什么”的例子。
附带问题,这个词是谁发明的?
当前回答
样板文件是一种写作单元,可以不作任何更改地反复使用。通过扩展,这种思想有时应用于可重用编程,如“样板代码”
其他回答
“样板代码”是任何看似重复的代码,它们一次又一次地出现,以获得一些看起来应该简单得多的结果。
这是一个主观的定义。
这个术语来源于报纸行业的“标准版”:wiki
In practical terms, boilerplate code is the stuff you cut-n-paste all over the place. Often it'll be things like a module header, plus some standard/required declarations (every module must declare a logger, every module must declare variables for its name and revision, etc.) On my current project, we're writing message handlers and they all have the same structure (read a message, validate it, process it) and to eliminate dependencies among the handlers we didn't want to have them all inherit from a base class, so we came up with a boilerplate skeleton. It declared all the routine variables, the standard methods, exception handling framework — all a developer had to do was add the code specific to the message being handled. It would have been quick & easy to use, but then we found out we were getting our message definitions in a spreadsheet (which used a boilerplate format), so we wound up just writing a code generator to emit 90% of the code (including the unit tests).
它是可以被许多应用程序/上下文使用的代码,只需很少或没有更改。
样板纸(Boilerplate)起源于20世纪初的钢铁工业。
您可以将其称为“片段”,或者更准确地称为“片段的集合”。 我认为这个术语是由新闻界和印刷业创造出来的,在那里他们使用实际的“板块”,然后再次将它们用作大块。 在现代互联网上,这是一个正在进行的(恕我冒犯)趋势的一部分,使用花哨的术语来描述简单的东西,以便看起来更时尚和复杂。参见响应性=适应性/流动性。
样板代码是指可以反复使用的一段代码。另一方面,任何人都可以说它是一段可重用的代码。
这个词实际上来自钢铁行业。
对于一点历史,根据维基百科:
在19世纪90年代,样板版实际上是铸造或冲压成金属,准备印刷,并分发给美国各地的报纸。直到20世纪50年代,成千上万的报纸从美国最大的供应商西部报业联盟那里收到并使用了这种样板文件。有些公司还以样板文件的形式发布新闻稿,这样它们就必须按书面形式打印出来。
根据维基百科:
In object-oriented programs, classes are often provided with methods for getting and setting instance variables. The definitions of these methods can frequently be regarded as boilerplate. Although the code will vary from one class to another, it is sufficiently stereotypical in structure that it would be better generated automatically than written by hand. For example, in the following Java class representing a pet, almost all the code is boilerplate except for the declarations of Pet, name and owner: public class Pet { private PetName name; private Person owner; public Pet(PetName name, Person owner) { this.name = name; this.owner = owner; } public PetName getName() { return name; } public void setName(PetName name) { this.name = name; } public Person getOwner() { return owner; } public void setOwner(Person owner) { this.owner = owner; } }