我通常使用以下习语来检查String是否可以转换为整数。
public boolean isInteger( String input ) {
try {
Integer.parseInt( input );
return true;
}
catch( Exception e ) {
return false;
}
}
是我的错觉,还是你觉得这有点粗俗?还有什么更好的办法吗?
看看我的回答(带有基准,基于CodingWithSpike之前的回答),看看为什么我改变了立场,接受了Jonas Klemming对这个问题的回答。我认为大多数人都会使用这个原始代码,因为它实现起来更快,也更易于维护,但是当提供非整数数据时,它就慢了几个数量级。
如果你想检查字符串是否代表一个适合int类型的整数,我对jonas的答案做了一点修改,以便字符串表示大于integer的整数。MAX_VALUE或小于Integer。MIN_VALUE,现在将返回false。例如:"3147483647"将返回false,因为3147483647大于2147483647,同样,"-2147483649"也将返回false,因为-2147483649小于-2147483648。
public static boolean isInt(String s) {
if(s == null) {
return false;
}
s = s.trim(); //Don't get tricked by whitespaces.
int len = s.length();
if(len == 0) {
return false;
}
//The bottom limit of an int is -2147483648 which is 11 chars long.
//[note that the upper limit (2147483647) is only 10 chars long]
//Thus any string with more than 11 chars, even if represents a valid integer,
//it won't fit in an int.
if(len > 11) {
return false;
}
char c = s.charAt(0);
int i = 0;
//I don't mind the plus sign, so "+13" will return true.
if(c == '-' || c == '+') {
//A single "+" or "-" is not a valid integer.
if(len == 1) {
return false;
}
i = 1;
}
//Check if all chars are digits
for(; i < len; i++) {
c = s.charAt(i);
if(c < '0' || c > '9') {
return false;
}
}
//If we reached this point then we know for sure that the string has at
//most 11 chars and that they're all digits (the first one might be a '+'
// or '-' thought).
//Now we just need to check, for 10 and 11 chars long strings, if the numbers
//represented by the them don't surpass the limits.
c = s.charAt(0);
char l;
String limit;
if(len == 10 && c != '-' && c != '+') {
limit = "2147483647";
//Now we are going to compare each char of the string with the char in
//the limit string that has the same index, so if the string is "ABC" and
//the limit string is "DEF" then we are gonna compare A to D, B to E and so on.
//c is the current string's char and l is the corresponding limit's char
//Note that the loop only continues if c == l. Now imagine that our string
//is "2150000000", 2 == 2 (next), 1 == 1 (next), 5 > 4 as you can see,
//because 5 > 4 we can guarantee that the string will represent a bigger integer.
//Similarly, if our string was "2139999999", when we find out that 3 < 4,
//we can also guarantee that the integer represented will fit in an int.
for(i = 0; i < len; i++) {
c = s.charAt(i);
l = limit.charAt(i);
if(c > l) {
return false;
}
if(c < l) {
return true;
}
}
}
c = s.charAt(0);
if(len == 11) {
//If the first char is neither '+' nor '-' then 11 digits represent a
//bigger integer than 2147483647 (10 digits).
if(c != '+' && c != '-') {
return false;
}
limit = (c == '-') ? "-2147483648" : "+2147483647";
//Here we're applying the same logic that we applied in the previous case
//ignoring the first char.
for(i = 1; i < len; i++) {
c = s.charAt(i);
l = limit.charAt(i);
if(c > l) {
return false;
}
if(c < l) {
return true;
}
}
}
//The string passed all tests, so it must represent a number that fits
//in an int...
return true;
}
I recently (today) needed to figure out a quick way to do this and of course I was going to use the exception approach for ease when the monkey on the shoulder (conscience) woke up so it took me down this old familiar rabbit hole; no exceptions are not that much more expensive in fact sometimes exceptions are faster (old AIX multiprocessor systems) but regardless it’s to elegant so I did something that the younger me never did and to my amazement nobody here did either (apologize if someone did and I missed it I honestly did not find) : so what did I think we all missed; taking a look at how the JRE implemented it, yes they threw an exception but we can always skip that part.
10年前年轻的我可能会觉得这有失他的身份,但话又说回来,他是一个大嘴巴的炫耀者,性情不好,有一种神的情结,所以就是这样。
我把这些放在这里,是为了方便将来来这里的人。以下是我的发现:
public static int parseInt(String s, int radix) throws NumberFormatException
{
/*
* WARNING: This method may be invoked early during VM initialization
* before IntegerCache is initialized. Care must be taken to not use
* the valueOf method.
*/
if (s == null) {
throw new NumberFormatException("null");
}
if (radix < Character.MIN_RADIX) {
throw new NumberFormatException("radix " + radix +
" less than Character.MIN_RADIX");
}
if (radix > Character.MAX_RADIX) {
throw new NumberFormatException("radix " + radix +
" greater than Character.MAX_RADIX");
}
int result = 0;
boolean negative = false;
int i = 0, len = s.length();
int limit = -Integer.MAX_VALUE;
int multmin;
int digit;
if (len > 0) {
char firstChar = s.charAt(0);
if (firstChar < '0') { // Possible leading "+" or "-"
if (firstChar == '-') {
negative = true;
limit = Integer.MIN_VALUE;
} else if (firstChar != '+')
throw NumberFormatException.forInputString(s);
if (len == 1) // Cannot have lone "+" or "-"
throw NumberFormatException.forInputString(s);
i++;
}
multmin = limit / radix;
while (i < len) {
// Accumulating negatively avoids surprises near MAX_VALUE
digit = Character.digit(s.charAt(i++),radix);
if (digit < 0) {
throw NumberFormatException.forInputString(s);
}
if (result < multmin) {
throw NumberFormatException.forInputString(s);
}
result *= radix;
if (result < limit + digit) {
throw NumberFormatException.forInputString(s);
}
result -= digit;
}
} else {
throw NumberFormatException.forInputString(s);
}
return negative ? result : -result;
}