做了一个快速的基准测试。异常实际上并没有那么昂贵，除非您开始弹出多个方法，JVM必须做大量工作才能使执行堆栈就位。如果保持相同的方法，他们就不会表现不好。

 public void RunTests()
 {
     String str = "1234567890";

     long startTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
     for(int i = 0; i < 100000; i++)
         IsInt_ByException(str);
     long endTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
     System.out.print("ByException: ");
     System.out.println(endTime - startTime);

     startTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
     for(int i = 0; i < 100000; i++)
         IsInt_ByRegex(str);
     endTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
     System.out.print("ByRegex: ");
     System.out.println(endTime - startTime);

     startTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
     for(int i = 0; i < 100000; i++)
         IsInt_ByJonas(str);
     endTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
     System.out.print("ByJonas: ");
     System.out.println(endTime - startTime);
 }

 private boolean IsInt_ByException(String str)
 {
     try
     {
         Integer.parseInt(str);
         return true;
     }
     catch(NumberFormatException nfe)
     {
         return false;
     }
 }

 private boolean IsInt_ByRegex(String str)
 {
     return str.matches("^-?\\d+$");
 }

 public boolean IsInt_ByJonas(String str)
 {
     if (str == null) {
             return false;
     }
     int length = str.length();
     if (length == 0) {
             return false;
     }
     int i = 0;
     if (str.charAt(0) == '-') {
             if (length == 1) {
                     return false;
             }
             i = 1;
     }
     for (; i < length; i++) {
             char c = str.charAt(i);
             if (c <= '/' || c >= ':') {
                     return false;
             }
     }
     return true;
 }

输出:

ByException: 31 ByRegex: 453(注意:每次都重新编译模式) ByJonas: 16

我也同意Jonas K的解决方案是最稳健的。看起来他赢了:)

有番石榴版本:

import com.google.common.primitives.Ints;

Integer intValue = Ints.tryParse(stringValue);

如果解析字符串失败，它将返回null而不是抛出异常。

这是一个Java 8版本的Jonas Klemming回答:

public static boolean isInteger(String str) {
    return str != null && str.length() > 0 &&
         IntStream.range(0, str.length()).allMatch(i -> i == 0 && (str.charAt(i) == '-' || str.charAt(i) == '+')
                  || Character.isDigit(str.charAt(i)));
}

测试代码:

public static void main(String[] args) throws NoSuchAlgorithmException, UnsupportedEncodingException {
    Arrays.asList("1231231", "-1232312312", "+12313123131", "qwqe123123211", "2", "0000000001111", "", "123-", "++123",
            "123-23", null, "+-123").forEach(s -> {
        System.out.printf("%15s %s%n", s, isInteger(s));
    });
}

测试代码的结果:

        1231231 true
    -1232312312 true
   +12313123131 true
  qwqe123123211 false
              2 true
  0000000001111 true
                false
           123- false
          ++123 false
         123-23 false
           null false
          +-123 false

可以使用字符串类的matches方法。[0-9]表示它可以是的所有值，+表示它必须至少有一个字符长，*表示它可以是零或多个字符长。

boolean isNumeric = yourString.matches("[0-9]+"); // 1 or more characters long, numbers only
boolean isNumeric = yourString.matches("[0-9]*"); // 0 or more characters long, numbers only

这里有几个回答说尝试解析为整数并捕获NumberFormatException，但您不应该这样做。

这种方法将创建异常对象，并在每次调用它时生成堆栈跟踪，而且它不是整数。

Java 8中更好的方法是使用流:

boolean isInteger = returnValue.chars().allMatch(Character::isDigit);

I recently (today) needed to figure out a quick way to do this and of course I was going to use the exception approach for ease when the monkey on the shoulder (conscience) woke up so it took me down this old familiar rabbit hole; no exceptions are not that much more expensive in fact sometimes exceptions are faster (old AIX multiprocessor systems) but regardless it’s to elegant so I did something that the younger me never did and to my amazement nobody here did either (apologize if someone did and I missed it I honestly did not find) : so what did I think we all missed; taking a look at how the JRE implemented it, yes they threw an exception but we can always skip that part.

10年前年轻的我可能会觉得这有失他的身份，但话又说回来，他是一个大嘴巴的炫耀者，性情不好，有一种神的情结，所以就是这样。

我把这些放在这里，是为了方便将来来这里的人。以下是我的发现:

public static int parseInt(String s, int radix) throws NumberFormatException
{
    /*
     * WARNING: This method may be invoked early during VM initialization
     * before IntegerCache is initialized. Care must be taken to not use
     * the valueOf method.
     */

    if (s == null) {
        throw new NumberFormatException("null");
    }

    if (radix < Character.MIN_RADIX) {
        throw new NumberFormatException("radix " + radix +
                                        " less than Character.MIN_RADIX");
    }

    if (radix > Character.MAX_RADIX) {
        throw new NumberFormatException("radix " + radix +
                                        " greater than Character.MAX_RADIX");
    }

    int result = 0;
    boolean negative = false;
    int i = 0, len = s.length();
    int limit = -Integer.MAX_VALUE;
    int multmin;
    int digit;

    if (len > 0) {
        char firstChar = s.charAt(0);
        if (firstChar < '0') { // Possible leading "+" or "-"
            if (firstChar == '-') {
                negative = true;
                limit = Integer.MIN_VALUE;
            } else if (firstChar != '+')
                throw NumberFormatException.forInputString(s);

            if (len == 1) // Cannot have lone "+" or "-"
                throw NumberFormatException.forInputString(s);
            i++;
        }
        multmin = limit / radix;
        while (i < len) {
            // Accumulating negatively avoids surprises near MAX_VALUE
            digit = Character.digit(s.charAt(i++),radix);
            if (digit < 0) {
                throw NumberFormatException.forInputString(s);
            }
            if (result < multmin) {
                throw NumberFormatException.forInputString(s);
            }
            result *= radix;
            if (result < limit + digit) {
                throw NumberFormatException.forInputString(s);
            }
            result -= digit;
        }
    } else {
        throw NumberFormatException.forInputString(s);
    }
    return negative ? result : -result;
}