对于我正在从事的一个新的node.js项目,我正在考虑从基于cookie的会话方法(我的意思是,将id存储到用户浏览器中包含用户会话的键值存储中)切换到使用JSON Web Tokens (jwt)的基于令牌的会话方法(没有键值存储)。

这个项目是一个利用socket的游戏。IO——在一个会话(web和socket.io)中有多个通信通道的情况下,有一个基于令牌的会话会很有用。

如何使用jwt方法从服务器提供令牌/会话失效?

我还想了解使用这种范例应该注意哪些常见的(或不常见的)陷阱/攻击。例如,如果这种模式容易受到与基于会话存储/cookie的方法相同/不同类型的攻击。

所以,假设我有以下内容(改编自this和this):

会话存储登录:

app.get('/login', function(request, response) {
    var user = {username: request.body.username, password: request.body.password };
    // Validate somehow
    validate(user, function(isValid, profile) {
        // Create session token
        var token= createSessionToken();

        // Add to a key-value database
        KeyValueStore.add({token: {userid: profile.id, expiresInMinutes: 60}});

        // The client should save this session token in a cookie
        response.json({sessionToken: token});
    });
}

口令登录:

var jwt = require('jsonwebtoken');
app.get('/login', function(request, response) {
    var user = {username: request.body.username, password: request.body.password };
    // Validate somehow
    validate(user, function(isValid, profile) {
        var token = jwt.sign(profile, 'My Super Secret', {expiresInMinutes: 60});
        response.json({token: token});
    });
}

--

会话存储方法的注销(或失效)需要更新KeyValueStore 使用指定的令牌创建数据库。

在基于令牌的方法中似乎不存在这样的机制,因为令牌本身将包含通常存在于键值存储中的信息。


当前回答

下面是如何做到这一点,而不必对每个请求都调用数据库:

在内存缓存中保留一个有效标记的hashmap(例如一个大小有限的LRU) 当检查令牌时:如果令牌在缓存中,立即返回结果,不需要数据库查询(大多数情况下)。否则,执行全面检查(查询数据库,检查用户状态和无效令牌…)。然后更新缓存。 当令牌失效时:将其添加到数据库的黑名单中,然后更新缓存,如果需要,向所有服务器发送信号。

请记住,缓存的大小应该是有限的,就像LRU一样,否则可能会耗尽内存。

其他回答

在内存中做一个这样的列表

user_id   revoke_tokens_issued_before
-------------------------------------
123       2018-07-02T15:55:33
567       2018-07-01T12:34:21

如果您的令牌在一周内过期,则清除或忽略更早的记录。同时只保留每个用户的最新记录。 列表的大小取决于您保留令牌的时间以及用户撤销令牌的频率。 仅当表发生变化时才使用db。在应用程序启动时将表加载到内存中。

没有使用jwt的刷新…

我想到了两种袭击的场景。一个是关于登录凭证的泄露。另一个是对JWT的盗窃。

For compromised login credentials, when a new login happens, normally send the user an email notification. So, if the customer doesn't consent to being the one who logged in, they should be advised to do a reset of credentials, which should save to database/cache the date-time the password was last set (and set this too when user sets password during initial registration). Whenever a user action is being authorized, the date-time a user changed their password should be fetched from database/cache and compared to the date-time a given JWT was generated, and forbid the action for JWTs that were generated before the said date-time of credentials reset, hence essentially rendering such JWTs useless. That means save the date-time of generation of a JWT as a claim in the JWT itself. In ASP.NET Core, a policy/requirement can be used to do do this comparison, and on failure, the client is forbidden. This consequently logs out the user on the backend, globally, whenever a reset of credentials is done.

For actual theft of JWT... A theft of JWT is not easy to detect but a JWT that expires easily solves this. But what can be done to stop the attacker before the JWT expires? It is with an actual global logout. It is similar to what was described above for credentials reset. For this, normally save on database/cache the date-time a user initiated a global logout, and on authorizing a user action, get it and compare it to the date-time of generation of a given JWT too, and forbid the action for JWTs that were generated before the said date-time of global logout, hence essentially rendering such JWTs useless. This can be done using a policy/requirement in ASP.NET Core, as previously described.

现在,你如何发现JWT被盗?目前我对此的回答是,偶尔提醒用户全局注销并重新登录,因为这肯定会让攻击者注销。

上面的想法很好,但是有一种非常简单的方法可以使所有现有的jwt无效,那就是简单地改变秘密。

如果您的服务器创建了JWT,用一个秘密(JWS)对其进行签名,然后将其发送给客户端,简单地更改秘密将使所有现有的令牌无效,并要求所有用户获得一个新的令牌进行身份验证,因为他们的旧令牌突然根据服务器变得无效。

它不需要对实际的令牌内容(或查找ID)进行任何修改。

显然,这仅适用于当您希望所有现有令牌过期时的紧急情况,对于每个令牌过期,需要上述解决方案之一(例如短令牌过期时间或令牌内存储的密钥无效)。

A good approach to invalidating a token would still need database trips. For a purpose that includes when some parts of the user record change, for example changing roles, changing passwords, email, and more. One can add a modified or updated_at field in the user record, which records the time of this change, and then you include this in the claims. So when a JWT is authenticated, you compare the time in the claims with the one recorded in the DB, if that of the claim was before, then token is invalid. This approach is also similar to storing the iat in the DB.

注意:如果您正在使用modified或updated_at选项,那么您还必须在用户登录和退出时更新它。

如果“注销所有设备”选项是可接受的(在大多数情况下是):

将令牌版本字段添加到用户记录中。 将此字段中的值添加到存储在JWT中的声明中。 每次用户注销时增加版本。 在验证令牌时,将其版本声明与存储在用户记录中的版本进行比较,如果不相同则拒绝。

无论如何,在大多数情况下都需要db访问以获取用户记录,因此这不会给验证过程增加太多开销。与维护黑名单不同,在黑名单中,由于需要使用连接或单独调用、清除旧记录等,数据库负载非常重要。