在SQL Server 2016+中，您可以使用STRING_SPLIT函数:

DECLARE @names NVARCHAR(MAX) = 'ruby,rails,scruffy,rubyonrails';

SELECT * 
FROM Tags
WHERE Name IN (SELECT [value] FROM STRING_SPLIT(@names, ','))
ORDER BY [Count] DESC;

or:

DECLARE @names NVARCHAR(MAX) = 'ruby,rails,scruffy,rubyonrails';

SELECT t.*
FROM Tags t
JOIN STRING_SPLIT(@names,',')
  ON t.Name = [value]
ORDER BY [Count] DESC;

现场演示

公认的答案当然是可行的，这是一种方法，但它是反模式的。

E.按值列表查找行 这是对常见反模式的替代，例如在应用层或Transact-SQL中创建动态SQL字符串，或者使用LIKE操作符: 选择ProductId，名称，标签 从产品 ”,1、2、3”,像“%”+投(ProductId VARCHAR(20吗 )) + ',%';

附录:

为了改进STRING_SPLIT表函数行估计，将分离的值实体化为临时表/表变量是一个好主意:

DECLARE @names NVARCHAR(MAX) = 'ruby,rails,scruffy,rubyonrails,sql';

CREATE TABLE #t(val NVARCHAR(120));
INSERT INTO #t(val) SELECT s.[value] FROM STRING_SPLIT(@names, ',') s;

SELECT *
FROM Tags tg
JOIN #t t
  ON t.val = tg.TagName
ORDER BY [Count] DESC;

现场演示

相关内容:如何将值列表传递给存储过程

原来的问题有要求SQL Server 2008。因为这个问题经常被重复使用，所以我添加了这个答案作为参考。

I think this is a case when a static query is just not the way to go. Dynamically build the list for your in clause, escape your single quotes, and dynamically build SQL. In this case you probably won't see much of a difference with any method due to the small list, but the most efficient method really is to send the SQL exactly as it is written in your post. I think it is a good habit to write it the most efficient way, rather than to do what makes the prettiest code, or consider it bad practice to dynamically build SQL.

I have seen the split functions take longer to execute than the query themselves in many cases where the parameters get large. A stored procedure with table valued parameters in SQL 2008 is the only other option I would consider, although this will probably be slower in your case. TVP will probably only be faster for large lists if you are searching on the primary key of the TVP, because SQL will build a temporary table for the list anyway (if the list is large). You won't know for sure unless you test it.

I have also seen stored procedures that had 500 parameters with default values of null, and having WHERE Column1 IN (@Param1, @Param2, @Param3, ..., @Param500). This caused SQL to build a temp table, do a sort/distinct, and then do a table scan instead of an index seek. That is essentially what you would be doing by parameterizing that query, although on a small enough scale that it won't make a noticeable difference. I highly recommend against having NULL in your IN lists, as if that gets changed to a NOT IN it will not act as intended. You could dynamically build the parameter list, but the only obvious thing that you would gain is that the objects would escape the single quotes for you. That approach is also slightly slower on the application end since the objects have to parse the query to find the parameters. It may or may not be faster on SQL, as parameterized queries call sp_prepare, sp_execute for as many times you execute the query, followed by sp_unprepare.

重用存储过程或参数化查询的执行计划可能会提高性能，但它会将您锁定在由执行的第一个查询决定的执行计划中。在许多情况下，这对于后续查询可能不太理想。在您的情况下，重用执行计划可能是一个加分项，但它可能根本没有任何区别，因为示例是一个非常简单的查询。

悬崖笔记:

对于您的情况，您所做的任何事情，无论是使用列表中固定数量的项进行参数化(如果不使用则为空)，动态地构建带有或不带有参数的查询，还是使用带有表值参数的存储过程，都不会产生太大的区别。不过，我的一般建议如下:

你的case/简单查询很少参数:

动态SQL，如果测试显示更好的性能，可能会使用参数。

具有可重用执行计划的查询，通过简单地更改参数或如果查询很复杂则调用多次:

带有动态参数的SQL。

带有大列表的查询:

具有表值参数的存储过程。如果列表变化很大，则在存储过程上使用WITH RECOMPILE，或者简单地使用不带参数的动态SQL为每个查询生成新的执行计划。

在默认情况下，我将通过向IN条件传递一个表值函数(从字符串返回一个表)来实现这一点。

下面是UDF的代码(我从Stack Overflow的某个地方得到了它，我现在找不到源代码)

CREATE FUNCTION [dbo].[Split] (@sep char(1), @s varchar(8000))
RETURNS table
AS
RETURN (
    WITH Pieces(pn, start, stop) AS (
      SELECT 1, 1, CHARINDEX(@sep, @s)
      UNION ALL
      SELECT pn + 1, stop + 1, CHARINDEX(@sep, @s, stop + 1)
      FROM Pieces
      WHERE stop > 0
    )
    SELECT 
      SUBSTRING(@s, start, CASE WHEN stop > 0 THEN stop-start ELSE 512 END) AS s
    FROM Pieces
  )

一旦你得到了这个，你的代码就会像这样简单:

select * from Tags 
where Name in (select s from dbo.split(';','ruby;rails;scruffy;rubyonrails'))
order by Count desc

除非你有一个长得离谱的字符串，否则这应该与表索引一起工作得很好。

如果需要，你可以把它插入一个临时表，索引它，然后运行一个连接…

我使用了一个更简洁的投票结果:

List<SqlParameter> parameters = tags.Select((s, i) => new SqlParameter("@tag" + i.ToString(), SqlDbType.NVarChar(50)) { Value = s}).ToList();

var whereCondition = string.Format("tags in ({0})", String.Join(",",parameters.Select(s => s.ParameterName)));

它循环两次标记参数;但大多数时候这并不重要(它不会成为你的瓶颈;如果是，展开循环)。

如果你真的对性能感兴趣，不想重复循环两次，这里有一个不太漂亮的版本:

var parameters = new List<SqlParameter>();
var paramNames = new List<string>();
for (var i = 0; i < tags.Length; i++)  
{
    var paramName = "@tag" + i;

    //Include size and set value explicitly (not AddWithValue)
    //Because SQL Server may use an implicit conversion if it doesn't know
    //the actual size.
    var p = new SqlParameter(paramName, SqlDbType.NVarChar(50) { Value = tags[i]; } 
    paramNames.Add(paramName);
    parameters.Add(p);
}

var inClause = string.Join(",", paramNames);

如果你从。net调用，你可以使用Dapper dot net:

string[] names = new string[] {"ruby","rails","scruffy","rubyonrails"};
var tags = dataContext.Query<Tags>(@"
select * from Tags 
where Name in @names
order by Count desc", new {names});

这里是达普在思考，所以你不用思考。当然，类似的事情也可能发生在LINQ to SQL中:

string[] names = new string[] {"ruby","rails","scruffy","rubyonrails"};
var tags = from tag in dataContext.Tags
           where names.Contains(tag.Name)
           orderby tag.Count descending
           select tag;

下面是我用过的一个快速而又复杂的技巧:

SELECT * FROM Tags
WHERE '|ruby|rails|scruffy|rubyonrails|'
LIKE '%|' + Name + '|%'

下面是c#代码:

string[] tags = new string[] { "ruby", "rails", "scruffy", "rubyonrails" };
const string cmdText = "select * from tags where '|' + @tags + '|' like '%|' + Name + '|%'";

using (SqlCommand cmd = new SqlCommand(cmdText)) {
   cmd.Parameters.AddWithValue("@tags", string.Join("|", tags);
}

两个问题:

演出糟透了。像“%……%"查询没有索引。 请确保没有任何|、blank或null标记，否则将无法工作

有些人可能认为还有其他更清洁的方法可以做到这一点，所以请继续阅读。