product怎么样，我写了一个小小的Python类来统治它们:)

此外，您还可以获得自动代码完成、递归对象实例化和自动类型转换!

你完全可以做到你所要求的:

p = Prodict()
p.foo = 1
p.bar = "baz"

例1:类型提示

class Country(Prodict):
    name: str
    population: int

turkey = Country()
turkey.name = 'Turkey'
turkey.population = 79814871

例2:自动类型转换

germany = Country(name='Germany', population='82175700', flag_colors=['black', 'red', 'yellow'])

print(germany.population)  # 82175700
print(type(germany.population))  # <class 'int'>

print(germany.flag_colors)  # ['black', 'red', 'yellow']
print(type(germany.flag_colors))  # <class 'list'>

由于以下原因，我对现有的选项不满意，于是我开发了MetaDict。它的行为完全类似于dict，但支持点表示法和IDE自动补全，而没有其他解决方案的缺点和潜在的名称空间冲突。所有功能和使用示例都可以在GitHub上找到(见上面的链接)。

完全披露:我是MetaDict的作者。

我在尝试其他解决方案时遇到的缺点/限制:

Addict No key autocompletion in IDE Nested key assignment cannot be turned off Newly assigned dict objects are not converted to support attribute-style key access Shadows inbuilt type Dict Prodict No key autocompletion in IDE without defining a static schema (similar to dataclass) No recursive conversion of dict objects when embedded in list or other inbuilt iterables AttrDict No key autocompletion in IDE Converts list objects to tuple behind the scenes Munch Inbuilt methods like items(), update(), etc. can be overwritten with obj.items = [1, 2, 3] No recursive conversion of dict objects when embedded in list or other inbuilt iterables EasyDict Only strings are valid keys, but dict accepts all hashable objects as keys Inbuilt methods like items(), update(), etc. can be overwritten with obj.items = [1, 2, 3] Inbuilt methods don't behave as expected: obj.pop('unknown_key', None) raises an AttributeError

我发现自己想知道python生态系统中“字典键作为attr”的当前状态。正如一些评论者所指出的，这可能不是你想要从头开始的东西，因为有几个陷阱和脚枪，其中一些非常微妙。此外，我不建议使用Namespace作为基类，我已经走上了那条路，它并不漂亮。

幸运的是，有几个开源包提供了这个功能，可以安装了!不幸的是，有几个包。以下是截至2019年12月的概要。

竞争者(最近提交到|#提交|#投稿|覆盖率%):

上瘾者(2021-01-05 | 229 | | 100%)22 蒙克(2021-01-22 | 166 | 17 | ?) easydict (2021-02-28 | 54 | 7% | ?) attrdict(| 108 | 5 |地址:100%) prodict (2021-03-06 | 100 | 2 | ?)

不再保养或保养不足:

treedict (2014-03-28 | 95 | 2 | ?) bunch (2012-03-12 | 20% | 2 | ?) NeoBunch

目前我推荐咀嚼或上瘾。它们拥有最多的提交、贡献者和发布，这意味着它们都有一个健康的开源代码库。他们有最干净的自述。Md, 100%的覆盖率，以及一组好看的测试。

我在这场比赛中没有一只狗(现在!)，除了滚动我自己的dict/attr代码，浪费了大量的时间，因为我不知道所有这些选项:)。我可能会在未来贡献给addict/munch，因为我宁愿看到一个完整的包，而不是一堆碎片化的包。如果你喜欢它们，就投稿吧!特别是，看起来munch可以使用codecov徽章，addict可以使用python版本徽章。

瘾君子优点:

递归初始化(foo.a.b.c = 'bar')，类字典参数成为成瘾。Dict

成瘾的缺点:

阴影打字。词典，如果你从成瘾进口词典 不检查密钥。由于允许递归init，如果你拼错了一个键，你只是创建一个新属性，而不是KeyError(感谢AljoSt)

蒙克优点:

独特的命名 内置的JSON和YAML的ser/de函数

蒙克缺点:

没有递归初始化(你不能构造foo.a.b.c = 'bar'，你必须设置foo.a.b.c = 'bar')。A，然后foo, A。b等。

其中我发表评论

Many moons ago, when I used text editors to write python, on projects with only myself or one other dev, I liked the style of dict-attrs, the ability to insert keys by just declaring foo.bar.spam = eggs. Now I work on teams, and use an IDE for everything, and I have drifted away from these sorts of data structures and dynamic typing in general, in favor of static analysis, functional techniques and type hints. I've started experimenting with this technique, subclassing Pstruct with objects of my own design:

class  BasePstruct(dict):
    def __getattr__(self, name):
        if name in self.__slots__:
            return self[name]
        return self.__getattribute__(name)

    def __setattr__(self, key, value):
        if key in self.__slots__:
            self[key] = value
            return
        if key in type(self).__dict__:
            self[key] = value
            return
        raise AttributeError(
            "type object '{}' has no attribute '{}'".format(type(self).__name__, key))


class FooPstruct(BasePstruct):
    __slots__ = ['foo', 'bar']

This gives you an object which still behaves like a dict, but also lets you access keys like attributes, in a much more rigid fashion. The advantage here is I (or the hapless consumers of your code) know exactly what fields can and can't exist, and the IDE can autocomplete fields. Also subclassing vanilla dict means json serialization is easy. I think the next evolution in this idea would be a custom protobuf generator which emits these interfaces, and a nice knock-on is you get cross-language data structures and IPC via gRPC for nearly free.

如果您决定使用attrt -dicts，那么为了您自己(和您的队友)的理智，有必要记录期望哪些字段。

请随意编辑/更新这篇文章，以保持它的最新!

下面是一个使用内置collection .namedtuple的不可变记录的简短示例:

def record(name, d):
    return namedtuple(name, d.keys())(**d)

还有一个用法示例:

rec = record('Model', {
    'train_op': train_op,
    'loss': loss,
})

print rec.loss(..)

解决方案是:

DICT_RESERVED_KEYS = vars(dict).keys()


class SmartDict(dict):
    """
    A Dict which is accessible via attribute dot notation
    """
    def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
        """
        :param args: multiple dicts ({}, {}, ..)
        :param kwargs: arbitrary keys='value'

        If ``keyerror=False`` is passed then not found attributes will
        always return None.
        """
        super(SmartDict, self).__init__()
        self['__keyerror'] = kwargs.pop('keyerror', True)
        [self.update(arg) for arg in args if isinstance(arg, dict)]
        self.update(kwargs)

    def __getattr__(self, attr):
        if attr not in DICT_RESERVED_KEYS:
            if self['__keyerror']:
                return self[attr]
            else:
                return self.get(attr)
        return getattr(self, attr)

    def __setattr__(self, key, value):
        if key in DICT_RESERVED_KEYS:
            raise AttributeError("You cannot set a reserved name as attribute")
        self.__setitem__(key, value)

    def __copy__(self):
        return self.__class__(self)

    def copy(self):
        return self.__copy__()

显然，现在有一个库- https://pypi.python.org/pypi/attrdict -实现了这个确切的功能，加上递归合并和json加载。也许值得一看。