我将此用于MessageFormat(使用Java 1.4)。通过这种方式，我可以确保在进行国际化时没有难以提取的连接

i18n

String msg = "${message}";
Object[] params = {${params}};
MessageFormat.format(msg, params);

同样用于日志:

log

if(logger.isDebugEnabled()){
  String msg = "${message}"; //NLS-1
  Object[] params = {${params}};
  logger.debug(MessageFormat.format(msg, params));
}

在当前范围内抛出一个变量IllegalArgumentException (illarg):

throw new IllegalArgumentException(${var});

更好的

throw new IllegalArgumentException("Invalid ${var} " + ${var});  

使用Mockito创建一个mock(在“Java语句”上下文中):

${:importStatic('org.mockito.Mockito.mock')}${Type} ${mockName} = mock(${Type}.class);

在“Java类型成员”中:

${:import(org.mockito.Mock)}@Mock
${Type} ${mockName};

模拟void方法抛出异常:

${:import(org.mockito.invocation.InvocationOnMock,org.mockito.stubbing.Answer)}
doThrow(${RuntimeException}.class).when(${mock:localVar}).${mockedMethod}(${args});

模拟一个void方法来做一些事情:

${:import(org.mockito.invocation.InvocationOnMock,org.mockito.stubbing.Answer)}doAnswer(new Answer<Object>() {
public Object answer(InvocationOnMock invocation) throws Throwable {
    Object arg1 = invocation.getArguments()[0];
    return null;
}
}).when(${mock:localVar}).${mockedMethod}(${args});

验证被模拟的方法被精确地调用一次:

${:importStatic(org.mockito.Mockito.verify,org.mockito.Mockito.times)}
verify(${mock:localVar}, times(1)).${mockMethod}(${args});

验证mock方法从未被调用:

${:importStatic(org.mockito.Mockito.verify,org.mockito.Mockito.never)}verify(${mock:localVar}, never()).${mockMethod}(${args});

使用谷歌Guava的新链表(hashset和hashmap也类似):

${import:import(java.util.List,com.google.common.collect.Lists)}List<${T}> ${newName} = Lists.newLinkedList();

我还使用了一个生成Test类的巨大模板。下面是一个简短的片段，每个感兴趣的人都应该定制:

package ${enclosing_package};

import org.junit.*;
import static org.junit.Assert.*;
import static org.hamcrest.Matchers.*;
import static org.mockito.Matchers.*;
import static org.mockito.Mockito.*;
import org.mockito.Mockito;
import org.slf4j.Logger;
import org.mockito.InjectMocks;
import org.mockito.Mock;
import org.mockito.runners.MockitoJUnitRunner;
import org.junit.runner.RunWith;

// TODO autogenerated test stub
@RunWith(MockitoJUnitRunner.class)
public class ${primary_type_name} {

    @InjectMocks
    protected ${testedType} ${testedInstance};
    ${cursor}

    @Mock
    protected Logger logger;

    @Before
    public void setup() throws Exception {
    }

    @Test
    public void shouldXXX() throws Exception {
        // given

        // when
        // TODO autogenerated method stub

        // then
        fail("Not implemented.");
    }
}
// Here goes mockito+junit cheetsheet

从当前显示中获取SWT颜色:

Display.getCurrent().getSystemColor(SWT.COLOR_${cursor})

周围都是syncexec

PlatformUI.getWorkbench().getDisplay().syncExec(new Runnable(){
    public void run(){
        ${line_selection}${cursor}
    }
});

使用单例设计模式:

/**
 * The shared instance.
 */
private static ${enclosing_type} instance = new ${enclosing_type}();

/**
 * Private constructor.
 */
private ${enclosing_type}() {
    super();
}

/**
 * Returns this shared instance.
 *
 * @returns The shared instance
 */
public static ${enclosing_type} getInstance() {
    return instance;
}

我知道我是在找死，但为了完成起见，我想分享这个:

单例生成模板的正确版本，克服了有缺陷的双重检查锁定设计(上面讨论过，其他地方也提到过)

单例创建模板: 命名为createsingleton

static enum Singleton {
    INSTANCE;

    private static final ${enclosing_type} singleton = new ${enclosing_type}();

    public ${enclosing_type} getSingleton() {
        return singleton;
    }
}
${cursor}

访问使用上述方法生成的单例对象:

单例引用模板: 命名这个getsingleton:

${type} ${newName} = ${type}.Singleton.INSTANCE.getSingleton();

Null检查!

if( ${word_selection} != null ){
    ${cursor}
}

if( ${word_selection} == null ){
    ${cursor}
}