其他略有不同的方法:

with t1_count as (select count(*) c1 from t1),
     t2_count as (select count(*) c2 from t2)
select c1,
       c2
from   t1_count,
       t2_count
/

select c1,
       c2
from   (select count(*) c1 from t1) t1_count,
       (select count(*) c2 from t2) t2_count
/

SELECT (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM table1) + (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM table2) FROM dual;

SELECT  (
        SELECT COUNT(*)
        FROM   tbl1
        )
        +
        (
        SELECT COUNT(*)
        FROM   tbl2
        ) 
    as TotalCount

我的经验是使用SQL Server，但是你能做到:

select (select count(*) from table1) as count1,
  (select count(*) from table2) as count2

在SQL Server我得到的结果，你是后。

--============= FIRST WAY (Shows as Multiple Row) ===============
SELECT 'tblProducts' [TableName], COUNT(P.Id) [RowCount] FROM tblProducts P
UNION ALL
SELECT 'tblProductSales' [TableName], COUNT(S.Id) [RowCount] FROM tblProductSales S


--============== SECOND WAY (Shows in a Single Row) =============
SELECT  
(SELECT COUNT(Id) FROM   tblProducts) AS ProductCount,
(SELECT COUNT(Id) FROM   tblProductSales) AS SalesCount

只是因为它略有不同:

SELECT 'table_1' AS table_name, COUNT(*) FROM table_1
UNION
SELECT 'table_2' AS table_name, COUNT(*) FROM table_2
UNION
SELECT 'table_3' AS table_name, COUNT(*) FROM table_3

它给出了转置的答案(每个表一行而不是一列)，否则我不认为它有多大不同。我认为在性能方面，它们应该是相等的。