我想做一些事情,比如:
MyObject myObj = GetMyObj(); // Create and fill a new object
MyObject newObj = myObj.Clone();
然后对未反映在原始对象中的新对象进行更改。
我通常不需要这个功能,所以当有必要时,我会创建一个新对象,然后单独复制每个属性,但这总是让我觉得有更好或更优雅的方法来处理这种情况。
如何克隆或深度复制对象,以便在原始对象中不反映任何更改的情况下修改克隆的对象?
我想做一些事情,比如:
MyObject myObj = GetMyObj(); // Create and fill a new object
MyObject newObj = myObj.Clone();
然后对未反映在原始对象中的新对象进行更改。
我通常不需要这个功能,所以当有必要时,我会创建一个新对象,然后单独复制每个属性,但这总是让我觉得有更好或更优雅的方法来处理这种情况。
如何克隆或深度复制对象,以便在原始对象中不反映任何更改的情况下修改克隆的对象?
当前回答
映射器执行深度复制。为对象的每个成员创建一个新对象并分配其所有值。它递归地处理每个非基元内部成员。
我建议您选择目前发展最快、最活跃的产品之一。我建议使用UltraMapperhttps://github.com/maurosampietro/UltraMapper
Nuget软件包:https://www.nuget.org/packages/UltraMapper/
其他回答
我更喜欢复制构造函数而不是克隆。意图更加明确。
我已经创建了一个可接受答案的版本,该版本同时适用于“[Serializable]”和“[DataContract]”。我写它已经有一段时间了,但如果我没有记错,[DataContract]需要一个不同的序列化程序。
需要System、System.IO、System.Runtime.Serialization、System.Runtime.Serialization.Formatters.Binary、System.Xml;
public static class ObjectCopier
{
/// <summary>
/// Perform a deep Copy of an object that is marked with '[Serializable]' or '[DataContract]'
/// </summary>
/// <typeparam name="T">The type of object being copied.</typeparam>
/// <param name="source">The object instance to copy.</param>
/// <returns>The copied object.</returns>
public static T Clone<T>(T source)
{
if (typeof(T).IsSerializable == true)
{
return CloneUsingSerializable<T>(source);
}
if (IsDataContract(typeof(T)) == true)
{
return CloneUsingDataContracts<T>(source);
}
throw new ArgumentException("The type must be Serializable or use DataContracts.", "source");
}
/// <summary>
/// Perform a deep Copy of an object that is marked with '[Serializable]'
/// </summary>
/// <remarks>
/// Found on http://stackoverflow.com/questions/78536/cloning-objects-in-c-sharp
/// Uses code found on CodeProject, which allows free use in third party apps
/// - http://www.codeproject.com/KB/tips/SerializedObjectCloner.aspx
/// </remarks>
/// <typeparam name="T">The type of object being copied.</typeparam>
/// <param name="source">The object instance to copy.</param>
/// <returns>The copied object.</returns>
public static T CloneUsingSerializable<T>(T source)
{
if (!typeof(T).IsSerializable)
{
throw new ArgumentException("The type must be serializable.", "source");
}
// Don't serialize a null object, simply return the default for that object
if (Object.ReferenceEquals(source, null))
{
return default(T);
}
IFormatter formatter = new BinaryFormatter();
Stream stream = new MemoryStream();
using (stream)
{
formatter.Serialize(stream, source);
stream.Seek(0, SeekOrigin.Begin);
return (T)formatter.Deserialize(stream);
}
}
/// <summary>
/// Perform a deep Copy of an object that is marked with '[DataContract]'
/// </summary>
/// <typeparam name="T">The type of object being copied.</typeparam>
/// <param name="source">The object instance to copy.</param>
/// <returns>The copied object.</returns>
public static T CloneUsingDataContracts<T>(T source)
{
if (IsDataContract(typeof(T)) == false)
{
throw new ArgumentException("The type must be a data contract.", "source");
}
// ** Don't serialize a null object, simply return the default for that object
if (Object.ReferenceEquals(source, null))
{
return default(T);
}
DataContractSerializer dcs = new DataContractSerializer(typeof(T));
using(Stream stream = new MemoryStream())
{
using (XmlDictionaryWriter writer = XmlDictionaryWriter.CreateBinaryWriter(stream))
{
dcs.WriteObject(writer, source);
writer.Flush();
stream.Seek(0, SeekOrigin.Begin);
using (XmlDictionaryReader reader = XmlDictionaryReader.CreateBinaryReader(stream, XmlDictionaryReaderQuotas.Max))
{
return (T)dcs.ReadObject(reader);
}
}
}
}
/// <summary>
/// Helper function to check if a class is a [DataContract]
/// </summary>
/// <param name="type">The type of the object to check.</param>
/// <returns>Boolean flag indicating if the class is a DataContract (true) or not (false) </returns>
public static bool IsDataContract(Type type)
{
object[] attributes = type.GetCustomAttributes(typeof(DataContractAttribute), false);
return attributes.Length == 1;
}
}
我提出这一点是为了克服.NET的一个缺点,即必须手动深度复制List<T>。
我使用这个:
static public IEnumerable<SpotPlacement> CloneList(List<SpotPlacement> spotPlacements)
{
foreach (SpotPlacement sp in spotPlacements)
{
yield return (SpotPlacement)sp.Clone();
}
}
在另一个地方:
public object Clone()
{
OrderItem newOrderItem = new OrderItem();
...
newOrderItem._exactPlacements.AddRange(SpotPlacement.CloneList(_exactPlacements));
...
return newOrderItem;
}
我试图提出一个这样做的oneliner,但这是不可能的,因为yield不能在匿名方法块中工作。
更好的是,使用通用的List<T>克隆器:
class Utility<T> where T : ICloneable
{
static public IEnumerable<T> CloneList(List<T> tl)
{
foreach (T t in tl)
{
yield return (T)t.Clone();
}
}
}
映射器执行深度复制。为对象的每个成员创建一个新对象并分配其所有值。它递归地处理每个非基元内部成员。
我建议您选择目前发展最快、最活跃的产品之一。我建议使用UltraMapperhttps://github.com/maurosampietro/UltraMapper
Nuget软件包:https://www.nuget.org/packages/UltraMapper/
如果您的对象树是可序列化的,您也可以使用以下内容
static public MyClass Clone(MyClass myClass)
{
MyClass clone;
XmlSerializer ser = new XmlSerializer(typeof(MyClass), _xmlAttributeOverrides);
using (var ms = new MemoryStream())
{
ser.Serialize(ms, myClass);
ms.Position = 0;
clone = (MyClass)ser.Deserialize(ms);
}
return clone;
}
请注意,此解决方案非常简单,但它不像其他解决方案那样高效。
请确保,如果类增长,仍然只有那些字段被克隆,这些字段也会被序列化。