如果你在。net 4.5中使用动态，你不需要担心INotifyPropertyChanged。

dynamic obj = new ExpandoObject();
obj.Name = "John";

如果Name被绑定到某个控件，它就可以正常工作。

让我介绍一下我自己的方法，叫做Yappi。 它属于运行时代理|派生类生成器，向现有对象或类型添加新功能，如种姓项目的动态代理。

它允许在基类中实现INotifyPropertyChanged一次，然后以以下风格声明派生类，仍然支持INotifyPropertyChanged用于新属性:

public class Animal:Concept
{
    protected Animal(){}
    public virtual string Name { get; set; }
    public virtual int Age { get; set; }
}

派生类或代理构造的复杂性可以隐藏在下面这行代码后面:

var animal = Concept.Create<Animal>.New();

所有的INotifyPropertyChanged实现工作可以像这样完成:

public class Concept:INotifyPropertyChanged
{
    //Hide constructor
    protected Concept(){}

    public static class Create<TConcept> where TConcept:Concept
    {
        //Construct derived Type calling PropertyProxy.ConstructType
        public static readonly Type Type = PropertyProxy.ConstructType<TConcept, Implementation<TConcept>>(new Type[0], true);
        //Create constructing delegate calling Constructor.Compile
        public static Func<TConcept> New = Constructor.Compile<Func<TConcept>>(Type);
    }


    public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged;

    protected void OnPropertyChanged(PropertyChangedEventArgs eventArgs)
    {
        var caller = PropertyChanged;
        if(caller!=null)
        {
            caller(this, eventArgs);
        }
    }

    //define implementation
    public class Implementation<TConcept> : DefaultImplementation<TConcept> where TConcept:Concept
    {
        public override Func<TBaseType, TResult> OverrideGetter<TBaseType, TDeclaringType, TConstructedType, TResult>(PropertyInfo property)
        {
            return PropertyImplementation<TBaseType, TDeclaringType>.GetGetter<TResult>(property.Name);
        }
        /// <summary>
        /// Overriding property setter implementation.
        /// </summary>
        /// <typeparam name="TBaseType">Base type for implementation. TBaseType must be TConcept, and inherits all its constraints. Also TBaseType is TDeclaringType.</typeparam>
        /// <typeparam name="TDeclaringType">Type, declaring property.</typeparam>
        /// <typeparam name="TConstructedType">Constructed type. TConstructedType is TDeclaringType and TBaseType.</typeparam>
        /// <typeparam name="TResult">Type of property.</typeparam>
        /// <param name="property">PropertyInfo of property.</param>
        /// <returns>Delegate, corresponding to property setter implementation.</returns>
        public override Action<TBaseType, TResult> OverrideSetter<TBaseType, TDeclaringType, TConstructedType, TResult>(PropertyInfo property)
        {
            //This code called once for each declared property on derived type's initialization.
            //EventArgs instance is shared between all events for each concrete property.
            var eventArgs = new PropertyChangedEventArgs(property.Name);
            //get delegates for base calls.
            Action<TBaseType, TResult> setter = PropertyImplementation<TBaseType, TDeclaringType>.GetSetter<TResult>(property.Name);
            Func<TBaseType, TResult> getter = PropertyImplementation<TBaseType, TDeclaringType>.GetGetter<TResult>(property.Name);

            var comparer = EqualityComparer<TResult>.Default;

            return (pthis, value) =>
            {//This code executes each time property setter is called.
                if (comparer.Equals(value, getter(pthis))) return;
                //base. call
                setter(pthis, value);
                //Directly accessing Concept's protected method.
                pthis.OnPropertyChanged(eventArgs);
            };
        }
    }
}

它对于重构是完全安全的，在类型构造后不使用反射，并且足够快。

我实际上还没有机会尝试这个自己，但下次我设置一个大需求的INotifyPropertyChanged项目，我打算写一个Postsharp属性，将在编译时注入代码。喜欢的东西:

[NotifiesChange]
public string FirstName { get; set; }

将成为:

private string _firstName;

public string FirstName
{
   get { return _firstname; }
   set
   {
      if (_firstname != value)
      {
          _firstname = value;
          OnPropertyChanged("FirstName")
      }
   }
}

我不确定这在实践中是否有效，我需要坐下来尝试一下，但我不明白为什么不。我可能需要让它接受一些参数的情况下，超过一个OnPropertyChanged需要被触发(如果，例如，我有一个FullName属性在上面的类)

目前我在Resharper使用一个自定义模板，但即使这样，我也厌倦了我所有的属性太长。

啊，一个快速的谷歌搜索(我应该在写这篇文章之前做的)显示至少有一个人在这里之前做过类似的事情。跟我想的不完全一样，但也足以证明这个理论是正确的。

我在我的博客http://timoch.com/blog/2013/08/annoyed-with-inotifypropertychange/上介绍了一个绑定类 Bindable使用字典作为属性包。为一个子类添加必要的重载以使用ref参数管理它自己的支持字段是很容易的。

没有神奇的绳子 没有反映 是否可以改进为抑制默认字典查找

代码:

public class Bindable : INotifyPropertyChanged {
    private Dictionary<string, object> _properties = new Dictionary<string, object>();

    /// <summary>
    /// Gets the value of a property
    /// </summary>
    /// <typeparam name="T"></typeparam>
    /// <param name="name"></param>
    /// <returns></returns>
    protected T Get<T>([CallerMemberName] string name = null) {
        Debug.Assert(name != null, "name != null");
        object value = null;
        if (_properties.TryGetValue(name, out value))
            return value == null ? default(T) : (T)value;
        return default(T);
    }

    /// <summary>
    /// Sets the value of a property
    /// </summary>
    /// <typeparam name="T"></typeparam>
    /// <param name="value"></param>
    /// <param name="name"></param>
    /// <remarks>Use this overload when implicitly naming the property</remarks>
    protected void Set<T>(T value, [CallerMemberName] string name = null) {
        Debug.Assert(name != null, "name != null");
        if (Equals(value, Get<T>(name)))
            return;
        _properties[name] = value;
        OnPropertyChanged(name);
    }

    public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged;

    protected virtual void OnPropertyChanged([CallerMemberName] string propertyName = null) {
        PropertyChangedEventHandler handler = PropertyChanged;
        if (handler != null) {
            handler(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(propertyName));
        }
    }
}

它可以这样使用:

public class Contact : Bindable {
    public string FirstName {
        get { return Get<string>(); }
        set { Set(value); }
    }
}

我使用以下扩展方法(使用c# 6.0)使INPC实现尽可能简单:

public static bool ChangeProperty<T>(this PropertyChangedEventHandler propertyChanged, ref T field, T value, object sender,
    IEqualityComparer<T> comparer = null, [CallerMemberName] string propertyName = null)
{
    if (comparer == null)
        comparer = EqualityComparer<T>.Default;

    if (comparer.Equals(field, value))
    {
        return false;
    }
    else
    {
        field = value;
        propertyChanged?.Invoke(sender, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(propertyName));
        return true;
    }
}

INPC实现可以归结为(你可以每次都实现它，也可以创建一个基类):

public class INPCBaseClass: INotifyPropertyChanged
{
    public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged;

    protected bool changeProperty<T>(ref T field, T value,
        IEqualityComparer<T> comparer = null, [CallerMemberName] string propertyName = null)
    {
        return PropertyChanged.ChangeProperty(ref field, value, this, comparer, propertyName);
    }
}

然后像这样写属性:

private string testProperty;
public string TestProperty
{
    get { return testProperty; }
    set { changeProperty(ref testProperty, value); }
}

注意:如果您愿意，可以在扩展方法中省略[CallerMemberName]声明，但我想保持它的灵活性。

如果你有一个没有支持字段的属性，你可以重载changeProperty:

protected bool changeProperty<T>(T property, Action<T> set, T value,
    IEqualityComparer<T> comparer = null, [CallerMemberName] string propertyName = null)
{
    bool ret = changeProperty(ref property, value, comparer, propertyName);
    if (ret)
        set(property);
    return ret;
}

一个例子是:

public string MyTestProperty
{
    get { return base.TestProperty; }
    set { changeProperty(base.TestProperty, (x) => { base.TestProperty = x; }, value); }
}

我正在编写一个处理INotifyPropertyChanged的库，主要思想是使用动态代理来通知更改。

回购在这里:CaulyKan/NoMorePropertyChanged

使用这个库，你可以写:

    public dynamic Test1Binding { get; set; }
    public TestDTO Test1
    {
        get { return (TestDTO)Test1Binding; }
        set { SetBinding(nameof(Test1Binding), value); }
    }

然后将所有绑定和修改转到Test1Binding，无论TestDTO有多复杂，它都会自动通知PropertyChange和CollectionChanged。

它还可以处理依赖关系。

    [DependsOn("Test1Binding.TestString")]
    public string Test2
    {
        get { return Test1Binding.TestString; }
    }

请给我一些建议。