你遇到过的源代码中最好的注释是什么?


当前回答

BerkeleyDB

/*
 * Chaos reigns within.
 * Reflect, repent, and reboot.
 * Order shall return.
 */
return (DB_RUNRECOVERY);

其他回答

// Okay, let's do the loop, yeah come on baby let's do the loop
// and it goes like this ...

为了保护有罪的人,价值观被改变了

这是一个承包商留下的,他一直在做一段负责测试电子邮件登录的代码。我们不相信,所以我们试了一下,这是一个有效的登录到他的个人帐户;我们再次检查了修订历史,他有两个签入来编辑它:一个是添加代码,另一个是注释掉它。

我们只添加了美术内容,而不去管其他内容;另一名开发人员认为,用未来的自己给他发电子邮件(游戏邦注:比如《The Office》)会很有趣,他说,在登录停止之前,他每天都要发两周的电子邮件。

'    ROFL:ROFL:LOL:ROFL:ROFL
'        ______/|\____
'  L    /          [] \
' LOL===_      ROFL    \_
'  L     \_______________]
'            I      I
'        /---------------/

'TODO: REMOVE MY INFO AND REPLACE WITH USER CREDENTIALS
'Private TEST_LoginName As String = "DurgshA@Exmaple.org"
'Private TEST_Password As String = "Humsal892"
'Private TEST_Server As String = "imap.secureserver.net"

我最喜欢的部分不是他做了这件事,也不是他不小心把它留在原地等待签到——而是当他再次看到它时,他只是把它注释掉了,而不是删除它。如果我们不知道它在那里,我们就不会去看原始版本:-D

试着在谷歌代码搜索中输入你最喜欢的脏话,它会消磨掉许多无聊的时间。以下是我最喜欢的例子:

/* These magic numbers are fucking stupid. */

/* Dear free software world, do you NOW see we are fucking
   things up?! This is insane! */

/* We will NOT put a fucking timestamp in the header here. Every
   time you put it back, I will come in and take it out again. */

# However, this only works if there are MULTIPLE checkboxes!
# The fucking JS DOM *changes* based on one or multiple boxes!?!?!
# Damn damn damn I hate the JavaScript DOM so damn much!!!!!!

/* TODO: this is obviously not right ... this whole fucking module
   sucks anyway */

/* FIXME: please god, when will the hurting stop? Thus function is so
   fucking broken it's not even funny. */

我个人最喜欢的

 # code below replaces code above - any problems?
 # yeah, it doesn't fucking work.
// This procedure is really good for your dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.

你们中有些人,由于某种特殊的原因,不知道DPC,当你深入学习新东西时,你大脑的这一部分会亮起来。

return 1; # returns 1