int MyFunction()
{
    // There once was a man named Dave
    int Result = 0;

    // Whose code just wouldn't behave
    MyObject *Ptr = new MyObject();

    // He left to go to a meetin'
    Result = Ptr->DoSomething();

    // And left his memory a leakin'
    return Result;
}

c++怎么样

 /**
   * Returns cookies according to the filters specified.
   * 
   * @return array  Cookies!  Nom nom nom nom nom.
   */
 public function data_getCookies($uid, $name) {

在facebook api的某个地方。

// TODO: Implement this function!

# To understand recursion, see the bottom of this file 

在文件的底部:

# To understand recursion, see the top of this file

我曾经使用MS SQL Server Developer 2000实现了一些文档工作流(人工工作流的东西)。

它由一堆触发器组成，这些触发器将被添加到数据库中，使其遵循工作流规则。

在其中一个触发器中，微软的某个人写了如下内容:

//Determine if the database has been "Grizzlified"

(该产品的内部名称是“Grizzly”，所以我觉得这很有趣)。

这一点对其他人来说很有趣，但对我来说就不那么有趣了。我从一个开发人员那里继承了代码(ASP)，而他自己也继承了它。第一个程序员编写了一些很难理解的代码。第二个开发者添加了如下评论(为了保护不那么无辜的人，名字被隐藏了):

'This code was written by **************.
'I haven't a clue what it does. He hasn't a clue what it does.
'Nobody else has a clue what it does or how it does it.
'It is something to do with data but **** knows what.
'The ******* still works so please do not change this code,
'even though it is a complete pile of ****.

那我为什么不觉得有趣呢?嗯，这是一个客户内部网的ASP代码。

.．.正是那位顾客向我强调了这条评论。

:-(