我需要一个滚动窗口(又名滑动窗口)可迭代的序列/迭代器/生成器。(默认的Python迭代可以被认为是一种特殊情况,其中窗口长度为1。)我目前正在使用以下代码。我怎样才能做得更优雅和/或更有效?

def rolling_window(seq, window_size):
    it = iter(seq)
    win = [it.next() for cnt in xrange(window_size)] # First window
    yield win
    for e in it: # Subsequent windows
        win[:-1] = win[1:]
        win[-1] = e
        yield win

if __name__=="__main__":
    for w in rolling_window(xrange(6), 3):
        print w

"""Example output:   
   [0, 1, 2]
   [1, 2, 3]
   [2, 3, 4]
   [3, 4, 5]
"""

对于window_size == 2的特定情况(即,在序列中迭代相邻的重叠对),请参见如何从列表中迭代重叠(当前,下一个)值对?


当前回答

让我们让它变懒!

from itertools import islice, tee

def window(iterable, size): 
    iterators = tee(iterable, size) 
    iterators = [islice(iterator, i, None) for i, iterator in enumerate(iterators)]  
    yield from zip(*iterators)

list(window(range(5), 3))
# [(0, 1, 2), (1, 2, 3), (2, 3, 4)]

其他回答

多个迭代器!

def window(seq, size, step=1):
    # initialize iterators
    iters = [iter(seq) for i in range(size)]
    # stagger iterators (without yielding)
    [next(iters[i]) for j in range(size) for i in range(-1, -j-1, -1)]
    while(True):
        yield [next(i) for i in iters]
        # next line does nothing for step = 1 (skips iterations for step > 1)
        [next(i) for i in iters for j in range(step-1)]

next(it)在序列结束时引发StopIteration,出于一些我无法理解的很酷的原因,yield语句在这里除外它,函数返回,忽略没有形成完整窗口的剩余值。

无论如何,这是目前为止行数最少的解决方案,它唯一的要求是seq实现__iter__或__getitem__,并且除了@dansalmo的解决方案之外,不依赖于itertools或集合:)

deque窗口的一个轻微修改版本,使其成为一个真正的滚动窗口。因此,它开始只填充一个元素,然后增长到它的最大窗口大小,然后缩小,因为它的左边缘接近结束:

from collections import deque
def window(seq, n=2):
    it = iter(seq)
    win = deque((next(it, None) for _ in xrange(1)), maxlen=n)
    yield win
    append = win.append
    for e in it:
        append(e)
        yield win
    for _ in xrange(len(win)-1):
        win.popleft()
        yield win

for wnd in window(range(5), n=3):
    print(list(wnd))

这给了

[0]
[0, 1]
[0, 1, 2]
[1, 2, 3]
[2, 3, 4]
[3, 4]
[4]
>>> n, m = 6, 3
>>> k = n - m+1
>>> print ('{}\n'*(k)).format(*[range(i, i+m) for i in xrange(k)])
[0, 1, 2]
[1, 2, 3]
[2, 3, 4]
[3, 4, 5]

这里有一行。我对它进行了计时,它与顶部答案的性能相当,并且随着更大的seq逐渐变得更好,len(seq) = 20时慢20%,len(seq) = 10000时慢7%

zip(*[seq[i:(len(seq) - n - 1 + i)] for i in range(n)])

尝试我的部分,简单,一行,使用islice的python方式。但是,可能不是最佳效率。

from itertools import islice
array = range(0, 10)
window_size = 4
map(lambda i: list(islice(array, i, i + window_size)), range(0, len(array) - window_size + 1))
# output = [[0, 1, 2, 3], [1, 2, 3, 4], [2, 3, 4, 5], [3, 4, 5, 6], [4, 5, 6, 7], [5, 6, 7, 8], [6, 7, 8, 9]]

解释: 通过使用window_size的islice创建窗口,并在所有数组上使用map迭代此操作。