这是我的解决方案。例子可以解释。唯一的要求是子类必须设置泛型类型，而不是对象。

import java.lang.reflect.AccessibleObject;
import java.lang.reflect.Field;
import java.lang.reflect.Method;
import java.lang.reflect.ParameterizedType;
import java.lang.reflect.Type;
import java.lang.reflect.TypeVariable;
import java.util.HashMap;
import java.util.Map;

public class TypeUtils {

    /*** EXAMPLES ***/

    public static class Class1<A, B, C> {

        public A someA;
        public B someB;
        public C someC;

        public Class<?> getAType() {
            return getTypeParameterType(this.getClass(), Class1.class, 0);
        }

        public Class<?> getCType() {
            return getTypeParameterType(this.getClass(), Class1.class, 2);
        }
    }

    public static class Class2<D, A, B, E, C> extends Class1<A, B, C> {

        public B someB;
        public D someD;
        public E someE;
    }

    public static class Class3<E, C> extends Class2<String, Integer, Double, E, C> {

        public E someE;
    }

    public static class Class4 extends Class3<Boolean, Long> {

    }

    public static void test() throws NoSuchFieldException {

        Class4 class4 = new Class4();
        Class<?> typeA = class4.getAType(); // typeA = Integer
        Class<?> typeC = class4.getCType(); // typeC = Long

        Field fieldSomeA = class4.getClass().getField("someA");
        Class<?> typeSomeA = TypeUtils.getFieldType(class4.getClass(), fieldSomeA); // typeSomeA = Integer

        Field fieldSomeE = class4.getClass().getField("someE");
        Class<?> typeSomeE = TypeUtils.getFieldType(class4.getClass(), fieldSomeE); // typeSomeE = Boolean


    }

    /*** UTILS ***/

    public static Class<?> getTypeVariableType(Class<?> subClass, TypeVariable<?> typeVariable) {
        Map<TypeVariable<?>, Type> subMap = new HashMap<>();
        Class<?> superClass;
        while ((superClass = subClass.getSuperclass()) != null) {

            Map<TypeVariable<?>, Type> superMap = new HashMap<>();
            Type superGeneric = subClass.getGenericSuperclass();
            if (superGeneric instanceof ParameterizedType) {

                TypeVariable<?>[] typeParams = superClass.getTypeParameters();
                Type[] actualTypeArgs = ((ParameterizedType) superGeneric).getActualTypeArguments();

                for (int i = 0; i < typeParams.length; i++) {
                    Type actualType = actualTypeArgs[i];
                    if (actualType instanceof TypeVariable) {
                        actualType = subMap.get(actualType);
                    }
                    if (typeVariable == typeParams[i]) return (Class<?>) actualType;
                    superMap.put(typeParams[i], actualType);
                }
            }
            subClass = superClass;
            subMap = superMap;
        }
        return null;
    }

    public static Class<?> getTypeParameterType(Class<?> subClass, Class<?> superClass, int typeParameterIndex) {
        return TypeUtils.getTypeVariableType(subClass, superClass.getTypeParameters()[typeParameterIndex]);
    }

    public static Class<?> getFieldType(Class<?> clazz, AccessibleObject element) {
        Class<?> type = null;
        Type genericType = null;

        if (element instanceof Field) {
            type = ((Field) element).getType();
            genericType = ((Field) element).getGenericType();
        } else if (element instanceof Method) {
            type = ((Method) element).getReturnType();
            genericType = ((Method) element).getGenericReturnType();
        }

        if (genericType instanceof TypeVariable) {
            Class<?> typeVariableType = TypeUtils.getTypeVariableType(clazz, (TypeVariable) genericType);
            if (typeVariableType != null) {
                type = typeVariableType;
            }
        }

        return type;
    }

}

泛型在运行时不会具体化。这意味着信息在运行时不存在。

在向Java中添加泛型的同时保持向后兼容性是一项壮举(您可以看到关于它的开创性论文:让未来对过去更加安全:向Java编程语言添加泛型)。

关于这个问题有丰富的文献，有些人对目前的状态不满意，有些人说实际上这是一个诱惑，没有真正的需要。你可以阅读这两个链接，我发现它们很有趣。

这里有一个方法，我用过一两次:

public abstract class GenericClass<T>{
    public abstract Class<T> getMyType();
}

随着

public class SpecificClass extends GenericClass<String>{

    @Override
    public Class<String> getMyType(){
        return String.class;
    }
}

这是我的解决方案

public class GenericClass<T>
{
    private Class<T> realType;

    public GenericClass() {
        findTypeArguments(getClass());
    }

    private void findTypeArguments(Type t) {
        if (t instanceof ParameterizedType) {
            Type[] typeArgs = ((ParameterizedType) t).getActualTypeArguments();
            realType = (Class<T>) typeArgs[0];
        } else {
            Class c = (Class) t;
            findTypeArguments(c.getGenericSuperclass());
        }
    }

    public Type getMyType()
    {
        // How do I return the type of T? (your question)
        return realType;
    }
}

不管你的类层次结构有多少层， 这个解决方案仍然有效，例如:

public class FirstLevelChild<T> extends GenericClass<T> {

}

public class SecondLevelChild extends FirstLevelChild<String> {

}

在本例中，getMyType() = java.lang.String

它可能对某人有用。你可以使用java.lang.ref.WeakReference; 这种方式:

class SomeClass<N>{
  WeakReference<N> variableToGetTypeFrom;

  N getType(){
    return variableToGetTypeFrom.get();
  }
}

一个简单的解决方案，这种出租车如下

public class GenericDemo<T>{
    private T type;

    GenericDemo(T t)
    {
        this.type = t;
    }

    public String getType()
    {
        return this.type.getClass().getName();
    }

    public static void main(String[] args)
    {
        GenericDemo<Integer> obj = new  GenericDemo<Integer>(5);
        System.out.println("Type: "+ obj.getType());
    }
}