可能已经说过了(也许这对一些人来说并不奇怪)，但我认为这很酷:

在Javascript中，声明函数接受的参数只是为了方便程序员。通过函数调用传递的所有变量都可以通过关键字“arguments”访问。所以下面会提醒“world”:

<script type="text/javascript">

function blah(){
alert(arguments[1]);
}

blah("hello", "world");

</script> 

注意，虽然这些参数看起来像是存储在数组中(因为您可以以与数组元素相同的方式访问对象属性)，但事实并非如此。arguments是一个对象，而不是数组(因此，它们是存储在数值索引下的对象属性)，如下例所示(typeOf函数来自Crockford的JavaScript补救页面):

argumentsExample = function(){
    console.log(typeOf(arguments));

    anArray = [];
    console.log(typeOf(anArray));

    anObject = {};
    console.log(typeOf(anObject));
}

function typeOf(value) {
    var s = typeof value;
    if (s === 'object') {
        if (value) {
            if (typeof value.length === 'number' &&
                    !(value.propertyIsEnumerable('length')) &&
                    typeof value.splice === 'function') {
                s = 'array';
            }
        } else {
            s = 'null';
        }
    }
    return s;
}

argumentsExample("a", "b");

在Python中，函数参数的“编译时”(或声明时)计算可能令人困惑:

def append(v, l = []):
    l.append(v)
    return l


print append(1)
print append(2)

>>> [1]
>>> [1,2]

其意图可能是:

def append(v, l = None):
    if l is None:
        l = []
    l.append(v)
    return l

print append(1)
print append(2)

>>> [1]
>>> [2]

这种行为对于缓存之类的事情很有用，但它可能是危险的。

附加特性:具有可变内容的元组:

a = (1,2,[3])
a[2][:] = [4] # OK
a[2] = [2] # crashes

PHP

$ php -r '::'
Parse error: syntax error, unexpected T_PAAMAYIM_NEKUDOTAYIM

WTF ? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scope_resolution_operator

为什么不说意外的T_SCOPE_RESOLUTION_OPERATOR ?

在Common Lisp中，零维数组是很奇怪的，而且很自然地，它们具有读取语法。

? (aref #0A5)
5

Perl

my %h1 = map { $_ => 1 } qw/foo bar baz/;    // construct an 'is_member' type lookup table
my %h2 = map { "$_" => 1 } qw/foo bar baz/;

第二行是一个语法错误，即使对一个有经验的perl程序员来说，它看起来是一样的。perl的缺点是总是试图做你想做的，而不是你说的。

Haskell's use of Maybe and Just. Maybe a is a type constructor that returns a type of Just a, but Maybe Int won't accept just an Int, it requires it to be a Just Int or Nothing. So in essence in haskell parlance Just Int is about as much of an Int as an apple is an orange. The only connection is that Just 5 returns a type of Maybe Interger, which can be constructed with the function Just and an Integer argument. This makes sense but is about as hard to explain as it can theoretically be, which is the purpose of haskell right? So is Just really JustKindaLikeButNotAtAll yea sorta, and is Maybe really a KindaLooksLikeOrIsNothing, yea sorta again.

-- Create a function that returns a Maybe Int, and return a 5, which know is definitly Int'able
>  let x :: Maybe Int; x = 5;
<interactive>:1:24:
    No instance for (Num (Maybe Int))
      arising from the literal `5' at <interactive>:1:24
    Possible fix: add an instance declaration for (Num (Maybe Int))
    In the expression: 5
    In the definition of `x': x = 5

>  Just 5  
Just 5
it :: Maybe Integer

    -- Create a function x which takes an Int
>  let x :: Int -> Int; x _ = 0;
x :: Int -> Int
-- Try to give it a Just Int
>  x $ Just 5                   

<interactive>:1:4:
    Couldn't match expected type `Int' against inferred type `Maybe t'
    In the second argument of `($)', namely `Just 5'
    In the expression: x $ Just 5
    In the definition of `it': it = x $ Just 5

祝你好运读到这篇文章，我希望它是正确的。