Haskell's use of Maybe and Just. Maybe a is a type constructor that returns a type of Just a, but Maybe Int won't accept just an Int, it requires it to be a Just Int or Nothing. So in essence in haskell parlance Just Int is about as much of an Int as an apple is an orange. The only connection is that Just 5 returns a type of Maybe Interger, which can be constructed with the function Just and an Integer argument. This makes sense but is about as hard to explain as it can theoretically be, which is the purpose of haskell right? So is Just really JustKindaLikeButNotAtAll yea sorta, and is Maybe really a KindaLooksLikeOrIsNothing, yea sorta again.

-- Create a function that returns a Maybe Int, and return a 5, which know is definitly Int'able
>  let x :: Maybe Int; x = 5;
<interactive>:1:24:
    No instance for (Num (Maybe Int))
      arising from the literal `5' at <interactive>:1:24
    Possible fix: add an instance declaration for (Num (Maybe Int))
    In the expression: 5
    In the definition of `x': x = 5

>  Just 5  
Just 5
it :: Maybe Integer

    -- Create a function x which takes an Int
>  let x :: Int -> Int; x _ = 0;
x :: Int -> Int
-- Try to give it a Just Int
>  x $ Just 5                   

<interactive>:1:4:
    Couldn't match expected type `Int' against inferred type `Maybe t'
    In the second argument of `($)', namely `Just 5'
    In the expression: x $ Just 5
    In the definition of `it': it = x $ Just 5

祝你好运读到这篇文章，我希望它是正确的。

我肯定会给Perl提供多个可怕的例子:

if(!$#var)

or

if($mystring =~ m/(\d+)/) {

更多的是平台特性而不是语言特性:在iPhone上，创建一个无限循环，里面有一些计算，然后运行你的程序。你的手机会发热，当外面冷的时候，你可以把它当手暖。

其他奇怪的事情:

在c++中，覆盖一个虚方法会隐藏该方法的所有其他重载。在Java中，这种情况不会发生。这很烦人。例如:http://codepad.org/uhvl1nJp

在c++中，如果基类有一个公共虚方法foo()，子类有一个私有方法foo()，这个私有方法会覆盖另一个方法! 这样，只需将子类对象指针强制转换为父类对象指针，就可以在类外部调用私有方法。这不应该是可能的:这违反了封装。新方法不应被视为对旧方法的重写。例如:http://codepad.org/LUGSNPdh

在PHP中，你可以定义函数来接受类型化参数(例如，对象是某个接口/类的子类)，讨厌的是，在这种情况下，你不能使用NULL作为实际的参数值。 例如:http://codepad.org/FphVRZ3S

C++:

void f(int bitand i){ //WTF
    i++;
}
int main(){
    int i = 0;
    f(i);
    cout << i << endl; //1
    return 0;
}

Perl的$[(已弃用)，这在之前关于通用Perl变量的另一篇文章中提到过，但它值得特别提到，并有更好的解释。对$[的更改仅限于当前范围。更多的信息以及如何使用它的含义;)可以在$[中找到，请访问http://www.perlmonks.org/index.pl/?node_id=480333