在你看来,你遇到过的最令人惊讶、最怪异、最奇怪或最“WTF”的语言特性是什么?

请每个回答只回答一个特征。


当前回答

c#中的“动态”。

因为智能感知、类型安全和决定论会随着“动态”关键字的第一次使用而立即消失,因此所有必须与RAD或python受害者一起工作的人的日子都被毁了。

其他回答

我一直是PHP错误的忠实粉丝,当在一行中使用两个冒号时脱离上下文:

解析错误:语法错误,第3行/path/to/file/error.php中的T_PAAMAYIM_NEKUDOTAYIM异常

第一次遇到这种情况时,我完全被弄糊涂了。

c++中我最喜欢的一个是“公共抽象具体内联析构函数”:

class AbstractBase {
public:
    virtual ~AbstractBase() = 0 {}; // PACID!

    virtual void someFunc() = 0;
    virtual void anotherFunc() = 0;
};

我是从Scott Meyers的《Effective c++》中偷来的。看到一个方法既是纯虚拟的(通常意味着“抽象”),又是内联实现的,这看起来有点奇怪,但这是我发现的确保对象被多态破坏的最佳和最简洁的方法。

回想起来,FORTRAN的计算goto是相当奇怪的。维基百科告诉我一些基础知识胜过它。

另一个著名的最爱是Algol 60的名称参数调用传递。

BrainFuck语言。真的是这样!

Haskell's use of Maybe and Just. Maybe a is a type constructor that returns a type of Just a, but Maybe Int won't accept just an Int, it requires it to be a Just Int or Nothing. So in essence in haskell parlance Just Int is about as much of an Int as an apple is an orange. The only connection is that Just 5 returns a type of Maybe Interger, which can be constructed with the function Just and an Integer argument. This makes sense but is about as hard to explain as it can theoretically be, which is the purpose of haskell right? So is Just really JustKindaLikeButNotAtAll yea sorta, and is Maybe really a KindaLooksLikeOrIsNothing, yea sorta again.

-- Create a function that returns a Maybe Int, and return a 5, which know is definitly Int'able
>  let x :: Maybe Int; x = 5;
<interactive>:1:24:
    No instance for (Num (Maybe Int))
      arising from the literal `5' at <interactive>:1:24
    Possible fix: add an instance declaration for (Num (Maybe Int))
    In the expression: 5
    In the definition of `x': x = 5

>  Just 5  
Just 5
it :: Maybe Integer

    -- Create a function x which takes an Int
>  let x :: Int -> Int; x _ = 0;
x :: Int -> Int
-- Try to give it a Just Int
>  x $ Just 5                   

<interactive>:1:4:
    Couldn't match expected type `Int' against inferred type `Maybe t'
    In the second argument of `($)', namely `Just 5'
    In the expression: x $ Just 5
    In the definition of `it': it = x $ Just 5

祝你好运读到这篇文章,我希望它是正确的。