不幸的是，这里没有很好的选择。记住，所有这些的目标都是保持类型安全。“Java泛型”提供了一种处理非泛型遗留库的解决方案，在8.2节中有一种特别的方法叫做“空循环技术”。基本上，使不安全施放，并压制警告。然后像这样循环地图:

@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
Map<String, Number> map = getMap();
for (String s : map.keySet());
for (Number n : map.values());

如果遇到意外类型，您将得到一个运行时ClassCastException，但至少它将发生在问题的根源附近。

快速猜测一下你是否发布了你的代码，可以肯定地说，但是你可能做了一些类似的事情

HashMap<String, Object> test = new HashMap();

当你需要做的时候，哪个会产生警告

HashMap<String, Object> test = new HashMap<String, Object>();

也许值得一看

Java编程语言中的泛型

如果你不熟悉需要做什么。

Two ways, one which avoids the tag completely, the other using a naughty but nice utility method. The problem is pre-genericised Collections... I believe the rule of thumb is: "cast objects one thing at a time" - what this means when trying to use raw classes in a genericised world is that because you don't know what is in this Map<?, ?> (and indeed the JVM might even find that it isn't even a Map!), it obvious when you think about it that you can't cast it. If you had a Map<String, ?> map2 then HashSet<String> keys = (HashSet<String>)map2.keySet() does not give you a warning, despite this being an "act of faith" for the compiler (because it might turn out to be a TreeSet)... but it is only a single act of faith. PS to the objection that iterating as in my first way "is boring" and "takes time", the answer is "no pain no gain": a genericised collection is guaranteed to contain Map.Entry<String, String>s, and nothing else. You have to pay for this guarantee. When using generics systematically this payment, beautifully, takes the form of coding compliance, not machine time! One school of thought might say that you should set Eclipse's settings to make such unchecked casts errors, rather than warnings. In that case you would have to use my first way.

package scratchpad;

import java.util.HashMap;
import java.util.Iterator;
import java.util.Map;
import java.util.Vector;

public class YellowMouse {

    // First way

    Map<String, String> getHashMapStudiouslyAvoidingSuppressTag(HttpSession session) {
      Map<?, ?> theHash = (Map<?, ?>)session.getAttribute("attributeKey");

      Map<String, String> yellowMouse = new HashMap<String, String>();
      for( Map.Entry<?, ?> entry : theHash.entrySet() ){
        yellowMouse.put( (String)entry.getKey(), (String)entry.getValue() );
      }

      return yellowMouse;
    }


    // Second way

    Map<String, String> getHashMapUsingNaughtyButNiceUtilityMethod(HttpSession session) {
      return uncheckedCast( session.getAttribute("attributeKey") );
    }


    // NB this is a utility method which should be kept in your utility library. If you do that it will
    // be the *only* time in your entire life that you will have to use this particular tag!!

    @SuppressWarnings({ "unchecked" })
    public static synchronized <T> T uncheckedCast(Object obj) {
        return (T) obj;
    }


}

如果我不得不使用一个不支持泛型的API ..我尝试用尽可能少的行将这些调用隔离在包装器例程中。然后我使用SuppressWarnings注释并同时添加类型安全类型强制转换。

这只是个人的喜好，想让事情尽可能的整洁。

警告抑制不是解决办法。你不应该在一个语句中执行两层类型转换。

HashMap<String, String> getItems(javax.servlet.http.HttpSession session) {

    // first, cast the returned Object to generic HashMap<?,?>
    HashMap<?, ?> theHash = (HashMap<?, ?>)session.getAttribute("attributeKey");

    // next, cast every entry of the HashMap to the required type <String, String>
    HashMap<String, String> returingHash = new HashMap<>();
    for (Entry<?, ?> entry : theHash.entrySet()) {
        returingHash.put((String) entry.getKey(), (String) entry.getValue());
    }
    return returingHash;
}

我可能误解了这个问题(一个示例和几行代码就好了)，但是为什么您不总是使用合适的接口(和Java5+)呢?我看不出为什么你想要强制转换到HashMap而不是Map<KeyType,ValueType>。事实上，我想不出有什么理由将变量的类型设置为HashMap而不是Map。

为什么源是一个对象?是遗留集合的参数类型吗?如果是，请使用泛型并指定所需的类型。